World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
11626
World Ranking
13216
National Ranking
1032

Phillip C. Wright publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip C. Wright sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 234 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Phillip C. Wright D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip C. Wright sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Phillip C. Wright is affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily centers on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, encompassing a total of eight publications in this major field. Within this domain, their work covers several subfields including molecular biology, renewable energy, sustainability and the environment, biomedical engineering, materials chemistry, and ecology.

The main topics explored in their research include:

  • Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Photosynthetic processes and mechanisms
  • Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Bacterial genetics and biotechnology
  • Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Trace elements in health
  • Metal extraction and bioleaching

Phillip C. Wright has contributed to several journals and publication venues. Frequent venues for their work include:

  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • Analytica Chimica Acta
  • Bioresource Technology

Some of their recent published papers are:

  • Phosphopeptide enrichment for phosphoproteomic analysis - A tutorial and review of novel materials, 2020, Analytica Chimica Acta
  • Effective pretreatment of lignocellulosic co-substrates using barley straw-adapted microbial consortia to enhanced biomethanation by anaerobic digestion, 2020, Bioresource Technology
  • Quantitative proteomic comparison of salt stress in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and the snow alga Chlamydomonas nivalis reveals mechanisms for salt-triggered fatty acid accumulation via reallocation of carbon resources, 2021, Biotechnology for Biofuels
  • Extracellular vesicles as an alternative copper-secretion mechanism in bacteria, 2022, Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • Ag-doped Cobweb-like structure of TiO2 nanotubes for antibacterial activity against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 2021, Journal of environmental chemical engineering

Throughout their career, Phillip C. Wright has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Mahendra P. Raut
  • Caroline A. Evans
  • Jagroop Pandhal
  • Trong Khoa Pham
  • Seham M. Hamed

Best Publications

  • Marine cyanobacteria—a prolific source of natural products

    Adam M. Burja;Bernard Banaigs;Eliane Abou-Mansour;J. Grant Burgess

  • iTRAQ underestimation in simple and complex mixtures: "the good, the bad and the ugly".

    Saw Yen Ow;Malinda Salim;Josselin Noirel;Caroline Evans

  • Technical, Experimental, and Biological Variations in Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation (iTRAQ)

    Chee Sian Gan;Poh Kuan Chong;Trong Khoa Pham;Phillip C. Wright

  • The symbiotic role of marine microbes on living surfaces

    Evelyn Armstrong;Liming Yan;Kenneth G. Boyd;Phillip C. Wright

  • An insight into iTRAQ: where do we stand now?

    Caroline Evans Evans;Josselin Noirel;Saw Yen Ow;Malinda Salim

  • Exploitation of marine algae: biogenic compounds for potential antifouling applications

    Punyasloke Bhadury;Punyasloke Bhadury;Phillip C. Wright

  • The current status of natural products from marine fungi and their potential as anti-infective agents

    Punyasloke Bhadury;Balsam T. Mohammad;Phillip C. Wright

  • Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) reproducibility: Implication of multiple injections.

    Poh Kuan Chong;Chee Sian Gan;Trong Khoa Pham;Phillip C. Wright

  • Gametes Alter the Oviductal Secretory Proteome

    A. Stephen Georgiou;Edita Sostaric;Chi H. Wong;Ambrosius P.L. Snijders

  • Modulation of the oviductal environment by gametes.

    A Stephen Georgiou;Ambrosius P L Snijders;Edita Sostaric;Reza Aflatoonian

  • Fluidization regimes in a conventional fluidized bed characterized by means of electrical capacitance tomography

    Y.T Makkawi;P.C Wright

  • iTRAQ-facilitated proteomic analysis of human prostate cancer cells identifies proteins associated with progression.

    Adam Glen;Chee S. Gan;Freddie C. Hamdy;Colby L. Eaton

  • Minimising iTRAQ ratio compression through understanding LC‐MS elution dependence and high‐resolution HILIC fractionation

    Saw Yen Ow;Malinda Salim;Josselin Noirel;Caroline Evans Evans

  • Quantitative shotgun proteomics of enriched heterocysts from Nostoc sp. PCC 7120 using 8-plex isobaric peptide tags.

    Saw Yen Ow;Tanai Cardona;Arnaud Taton;Ann Magnuson

  • Alcohol dehydrogenases from thermophilic and hyperthermophilic archaea and bacteria

    Helia Radianingtyas;Phillip C. Wright

  • iTRAQ identification of candidate serum biomarkers associated with metastatic progression of human prostate cancer

    Ishtiaq Rehman;Caroline A. Evans;Adam Glen;Simon S. Cross

  • Identification of the Missing Links in Prokaryotic Pentose Oxidation Pathways: EVIDENCE FOR ENZYME RECRUITMENT*

    Stan J.J. Brouns;Jasper Walther;Ambrosius P.L. Snijders;Harmen J.G. van de Werken

  • A review of current proteomics technologies with a survey on their widespread use in reproductive biology investigations.

    P.C. Wright;J. Noirel;S.-Y. Ow;A. Fazeli

  • Comparison of protein and peptide prefractionation methods for the shotgun proteomic analysis of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803

    Chee Sian Gan;Kenneth F. Reardon;Phillip C. Wright

  • A quantitative proteomic analysis of biofilm adaptation by the periodontal pathogen Tannerella forsythia

    Trong Khoa Pham;Sumita Roy;Josselin Noirel;Ian Douglas

Frequent Co-Authors

Ambrosius P. Snijders
Ambrosius P. Snijders The Francis Crick Institute
Paulo J. Oliveira
Paulo J. Oliveira University of Coimbra
Sonja-Verena Albers
Sonja-Verena Albers University of Freiburg
John van der Oost
John van der Oost Wageningen University & Research
Visakan Kadirkamanathan
Visakan Kadirkamanathan University of Sheffield
Guido Sanguinetti
Guido Sanguinetti International School for Advanced Studies
Stan J. J. Brouns
Stan J. J. Brouns Delft University of Technology
J. Grant Burgess
J. Grant Burgess Newcastle University
Stephen A. Billings
Stephen A. Billings University of Sheffield
Freddie C. Hamdy
Freddie C. Hamdy University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Phillip C. Wright

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles