World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
12051
World Ranking
5665
National Ranking
2507

Philip M. Groves publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Groves sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 153 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Philip M. Groves D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Groves sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip M. Groves is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their academic profile currently reflects active engagement in research without specific details on recent papers, publication venues, or coauthors.

Although details on Groves's recent publications are not available, the association with a prominent research institution such as the University of California, San Diego underscores involvement in advanced scientific or academic work. No book publications or awards have been listed in the available data.

The profile does not provide specific fields or subfields of study, nor does it list main topics of research interest. This suggests that detailed information about Groves's scientific focus or research contributions has not been disclosed or catalogued at this time.

Without records of recent papers, coauthors, or frequent publication venues, the academic footprint in terms of collaborative networks and research dissemination remains unspecified for this individual.

The absence of data on research topics and related publications limits the ability to outline precise areas of expertise or thematic concentration within the broader scientific landscape. Likewise, no references to honors or recognitions have been recorded.

Philip M. Groves remains a researcher associated with a major academic institution, and future updates may provide more comprehensive insights into their scholarly activities and contributions.

Best Publications

  • Habituation: A dual-process theory.

    Philip M. Groves;Richard F. Thompson

  • A theory of the functional organization of the neostriatum and the neostriatal control of voluntary movement

    Philip M. Groves

  • Self-inhibition by dopaminergic neurons.

    Philip M. Groves;Charles J. Wilson;Stephen J. Young;George V. Rebec;George V. Rebec

  • Fine structure and synaptic connections of the common spiny neuron of the rat neostriatum: A study employing intracellular injection of horseradish peroxidase

    Charles J. Wilson;Philip M. Groves

  • Spontaneous firing patterns of identified spiny neurons in the rat neostriatum.

    Charles J. Wilson;Philip M. Groves

  • Burst firing induced in midbrain dopamine neurons by stimulation of the medial prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices.

    R.F. Gariano;P.M. Groves

  • Biochemistry and Behavior: Some Central Actions of Amphetamine and Antipsychotic Drugs

    Philip M Groves;George V. Rebec

  • The substantia nigra of the rat: a Golgi study.

    Janice M. Juraska;Charles J. Wilson;Philip M. Groves

  • Monoaminergic synapses, including dendro-dendritic synapses in the rat substantia nigra.

    C. J. Wilson;P. M. Groves;E. Fifková

  • Statistical properties of neuronal spike trains in the substantia nigra: Cell types and their interactions

    Charles J. Wilson;Stephen J. Young;Philip M. Groves

  • 5-hydroxydopamine-labeled dopaminergic axns: Three-dimensional reconstructions of axons, synapses and postsynaptic targets in rat neostriatum

    P.M. Groves;J.C. Linder;S.J. Young

  • Dopamine receptor changes following destruction of the nigrostriatal pathway: lack of a relationship to rotational behavior.

    David A. Staunton;David A. Staunton;Barry B. Wolfe;Barry B. Wolfe;Philip M. Groves;Philip M. Groves;Perry B. Molinoff;Perry B. Molinoff

  • Histological and ultrastructural evidence thatd-amphetamine causes degeneration in neostriatum and frontal cortex of rats

    Lawrence J. Ryan;Jean C. Linder;Maryann E. Martone;Philip M. Groves

  • Brain stem pathways, cortical modulation, and habituation of the acoustic startle response.

    Philip M. Groves;Charles J. Wilson;Richard D. Boyle

  • Electrophysiologically identified nigral dopaminergic neurons intracellularly labeled with HRP: light-microscopic analysis.

    James Tepper;S. F. Sawyer;P. M. Groves

  • Electrophysiological characteristics of cells within mesencephalon suspension grafts

    L.J. Fisher;S.J. Young;J.M. Tepper;P.M. Groves

  • Dendro-dendritic synapses in substantia nigra: descriptions based on analysis of serial sections

    P M Groves;J C Linder

  • Terminal excitability of the corticostriatal pathway. II. Regulation by glutamate receptor stimulation.

    M. Garcia-Munoz;S.J. Young;P.M. Groves

  • Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase immunoreactive cells in the rat striatum: a possible site for the conversion of exogenous L-DOPA to dopamine.

    Anna Mura;Denise Jackson;Michael S. Manley;Stephen J. Young

  • Ultrastructural examination of enkephalin and substance P input to cholinergic neurons within the rat neostriatum.

    Maryann E. Martone;David M. Armstrong;Stephen J. Young;Philip M. Groves

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Armstrong
David M. Armstrong National Institutes of Health
James M. Tepper
James M. Tepper Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Eliezer Masliah
Eliezer Masliah National Institutes of Health
Charles J. Wilson
Charles J. Wilson The University of Texas at San Antonio
Fred H. Gage
Fred H. Gage Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Marco Diana
Marco Diana University of Sassari
Dilip V. Jeste
Dilip V. Jeste University of California, San Diego
Priyattam J. Shiromani
Priyattam J. Shiromani Veterans Health Administration
George V. Rebec
George V. Rebec Indiana University
Nicholas Ling
Nicholas Ling Salk Institute for Biological Studies

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing a degree pathway in neuroscience opens the door to a range of rewarding careers. Many students consider pursuing one of the most profitable majors to boost their future earning potential. STEM fields, including neuroscience, consistently rank among the highest for salary prospects, especially with further training or medical school.

Online education is an increasingly accessible option. Students looking to minimize their debt may want to consider cheap online colleges that offer legitimate programs and accept FAFSA. This can make advanced study in neuroscience or related fields more affordable.

Not everyone seeks a full degree. For those looking to quickly upskill and enter the workforce, acquiring one of the online certifications that pay well can be a smart move. These certifications may complement a neuroscience background, especially in areas such as data analysis, research, or healthcare technologies.

If balancing work, life, and study is a priority, students might look for the easiest degree to get online. Choosing the right fit can lead to faster graduation and job readiness, whether in neuroscience or a related field.

Best Scientists Citing Philip M. Groves

Recently Published Articles