World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter L. Douglas

Peter L. Douglas

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
42
Citations
7545
World Ranking
6517
National Ranking
264

Peter L. Douglas publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter L. Douglas sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 169 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Peter L. Douglas D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter L. Douglas sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter L. Douglas is affiliated with the University of Waterloo in Canada. Their research spans multiple aspects of engineering, with a particular focus on applied and industrial fields.

The primary fields of study covered by their work include engineering, with specific attention to subfields such as mechanical engineering, mechanics of materials, industrial and manufacturing engineering, biomedical engineering, and control and systems engineering.

Their main research topics cover a range of technical themes, including:

  • Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
  • Hydrocarbon Exploration and Reservoir Analysis
  • Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Process Optimization and Integration

They have contributed to several recent publications, which include:

  • Towards Increased Recovery of Critical Raw Materials from WEEE- evaluation of CRMs at a component level and pre-processing methods for interface optimisation with recovery processes, 2020, Resources Conservation and Recycling
  • A machine learning approach for modeling and optimization of a CO2 post-combustion capture unit, 2020, Energy
  • Techno-Economic Analysis of Pressurized Oxy-Fuel Combustion of Petroleum Coke, 2020, Energies
  • On the cause and correction of the anomalously high contact angles measured on soils and granular materials, 2021, Geoderma
  • Water-soil interactions: Unravelling the processes and stages involved in the wetting of water repellent soils, 2023, Journal of Hydrology X

Peter L. Douglas frequently publishes in venues such as Goldschmidt Abstracts, Resources Conservation and Recycling, Energy, Energies, and Geoderma.

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Rhys Charles
  • Matthew L. Davies
  • Helen M. Balshaw
  • Stefan H. Doerr
  • Yves Gélinas

This profile reflects an active engagement in research areas critical to advancing industrial engineering practices, environmental technologies, and material sciences, as demonstrated by the range of topics and continuous scholarly output over recent years.

Best Publications

  • Techno-economic study of CO2 capture from an existing coal-fired power plant: MEA scrubbing vs. O2/CO2 recycle combustion

    D Singh;E Croiset;P.L Douglas;M.A Douglas

  • Performance comparison of Fick’s, dusty-gas and Stefan–Maxwell models to predict the concentration overpotential of a SOFC anode

    R. Suwanwarangkul;E. Croiset;M.W. Fowler;P.L. Douglas

  • Simulation of CO2 capture using MEA scrubbing: a flowsheet decomposition method

    C. Alie;L. Backham;E. Croiset;P.L. Douglas

  • Simulation of a tubular solid oxide fuel cell stack using AspenPlusTM unit operation models

    W. Zhang;E. Croiset;P.L. Douglas;M.W. Fowler

  • Blended chitosan and polyvinyl alcohol membranes for the pervaporation dehydration of isopropanol

    A. Svang-Ariyaskul;R.Y.M. Huang;P.L. Douglas;R. Pal

  • Experimental and modeling study of solid oxide fuel cell operating with syngas fuel

    R. Suwanwarangkul;E. Croiset;E. Entchev;S. Charojrochkul

  • Technoeconomic evaluation of IGCC power plants for CO2 avoidance

    Guillermo Ordorica-Garcia;Peter Douglas;Eric Croiset;Ligang Zheng

  • Dynamic modelling and control of MEA absorption processes for CO2 capture from power plants

    Thanita Nittaya;Peter L. Douglas;Eric Croiset;Luis A. Ricardez-Sandoval

  • Dynamic simulation of MEA absorption process for CO2 capture from power plants

    Noorlisa Harun;Thanita Nittaya;Peter L. Douglas;Eric Croiset

  • Optimal planning of renewable energy-integrated electricity generation schemes with CO2 reduction target

    Z.A. Muis;H. Hashim;Z.A. Manan;F.M. Taha

  • Application of statistical design for the optimization of amino acid separation by reverse-phase HPLC

    Reza Gheshlaghi;Jeno Scharer;Murray Moo-Young;Peter Douglas

  • Supercritical CO2 extraction of nimbin from neem seeds – an experimental study

    Pathumthip Tonthubthimthong;Supaporn Chuaprasert;Peter Douglas;Wilai Luewisutthichat

  • Optimization Model for Energy Planning with CO2 Emission Considerations

    Haslenda Hashim;Peter Douglas;and Ali Elkamel;Eric Croiset

  • A simulation model of a CO2 absorption process with methyldiethanolamine solvent and piperazine as an activator

    Unknown

  • A multi-period optimization model for energy planning with CO2 emission consideration

    H. Mirzaesmaeeli;A. Elkamel;P.L. Douglas;E. Croiset

  • Extraction of antioxidants from sweet Thai tamarind seed coat––preliminary experiments

    Saowanee Luengthanaphol;Dayin Mongkholkhajornsilp;Supaporn Douglas;Peter L. Douglas

  • Integration of design and control for chemical processes: A review of the literature and some recent results ☆

    Luis A. Ricardez-Sandoval;H. M. Budman;P. L. Douglas

  • CO2 sequestration in Ontario, Canada. Part I: storage evaluation of potential reservoirs

    A Shafeen;E Croiset;P.L Douglas;I Chatzis

  • Supercritical CO2 extraction of nimbin from neem seeds : a modelling study

    Dayin Mongkholkhajornsilp;Supaporn Douglas;Peter L. Douglas;Ali Elkamel

  • Two-stage stochastic programming with fixed recourse via scenario planning with economic and operational risk management for petroleum refinery planning under uncertainty

    Cheng Seong Khor;Cheng Seong Khor;Ali Elkamel;Kumaraswamy Ponnambalam;Peter L. Douglas

  • Extraction of α-tocopherol and γ-oryzanol from rice bran

    Photchanathip Imsanguan;Amorn Roaysubtawee;Ratsuda Borirak;Suwassa Pongamphai

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Croiset
Eric Croiset University of Waterloo
Ali Elkamel
Ali Elkamel University of Waterloo
Haslenda Hashim
Haslenda Hashim University of Technology Malaysia
Luis A. Ricardez-Sandoval
Luis A. Ricardez-Sandoval University of Waterloo
M. Moo-Young
M. Moo-Young University of Waterloo
Michael Fowler
Michael Fowler University of Waterloo
Suttichai Assabumrungrat
Suttichai Assabumrungrat Chulalongkorn University
Xianshe Feng
Xianshe Feng University of Waterloo
Zainuddin Abdul Manan
Zainuddin Abdul Manan University of Technology Malaysia
Pu Chen
Pu Chen University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter L. Douglas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles