World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 72 1716 873 176 15249

Paul Reuben Day publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul Reuben Day between 1991 and 2010, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul Reuben Day published across 20 years, from 1991 to 2010, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2000. 8 of the 182 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2010. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2000. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 40 publications 2001: 27 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 1 publication
1991 2010

182 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul Reuben Day: publications per year, 1991 to 2010
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 4
1995 0
1996 2
1997 9
1998 14
1999 16
2000 40
2001 27
2002 7
2003 10
2004 10
2005 5
2006 8
2007 6
2008 14
2009 7
2010 1
Total 182
Download as CSV

Paul Reuben Day publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Reuben Day sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 172–181 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 176 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556 176
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul Reuben Day D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Reuben Day sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189 72
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • Programming language
  • The Internet

His scientific interests lie mostly in World Wide Web, Information retrieval, Multimedia, Web page and The Internet. His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Association and World Wide Web. His work on Ranking as part of general Information retrieval research is frequently linked to Product, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science.

His work on Electronic program guide as part of general Multimedia study is frequently connected to Visual interface, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them. His Web page research incorporates themes from Static web page, Control and Icon. His The Internet research incorporates elements of Punctuation and User profile.

His most cited work include:

  • Apparatus and method for selectively viewing video information (585 citations)
  • Dynamic regulation of television viewing content based on viewer profile and viewing history (570 citations)
  • Multi-node user interface component and method thereof for use in accessing a plurality of linked records (304 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Paul Reuben Day mainly focuses on World Wide Web, Information retrieval, Database, Real-time computing and Query optimization. The Web page, Web server, Electronic document and Semantic URL research Paul Reuben Day does as part of his general World Wide Web study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Electronic mail, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science. His work deals with themes such as Static web page and Multimedia, which intersect with Web page.

Paul Reuben Day focuses mostly in the field of Information retrieval, narrowing it down to topics relating to Hypertext and, in certain cases, Link. While the research belongs to areas of Database, Paul Reuben Day spends his time largely on the problem of Plan, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Database query. He has included themes like Event and Computer program in his Real-time computing study.

He most often published in these fields:

  • World Wide Web (21.18%)
  • Information retrieval (19.21%)
  • Database (15.76%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2006-2010)?

  • Query optimization (11.33%)
  • Database (15.76%)
  • Data mining (5.42%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Paul Reuben Day spends much of his time researching Query optimization, Database, Data mining, Real-time computing and Information retrieval. His Query optimization research includes elements of Query expansion, Database query, Database tuning and Sargable. He combines subjects such as Query plan, Computer program, Management system and Plan with his study of Database.

He combines Data mining and Product in his studies. Real-time computing is closely attributed to Task in his research. His research in Information retrieval intersects with topics in Document layout analysis, Multimedia and Font.

Between 2006 and 2010, his most popular works were:

  • Providing location information within a virtual world (60 citations)
  • Method of generating and utilizing debug history (50 citations)
  • Method and Apparatus for Generating Computer Programming Code Selectively Optimized for Execution Performance and Not Optimized for Serviceability (49 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Operating system
  • Programming language
  • Database

Paul Reuben Day mainly investigates View, Data mining, Database, Serviceability and Compiler. He combines subjects such as Query language, Query expansion, Web query classification, Sargable and Query optimization with his study of View. Paul Reuben Day interconnects Key, Information retrieval and Row in the investigation of issues within Data mining.

He studies Database index which is a part of Information retrieval. His work deals with themes such as Query plan, Real-time computing and Result set, which intersect with Database. Paul Reuben Day studied Serviceability and Parallel computing that intersect with Debugging.

Best Publications

  • Dynamic regulation of television viewing content based on viewer profile and viewing history

    Brian John Cragun;Paul Reuben Day

  • METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ACCESSING COMPUTER DATA

    Bates Cary Lee;Day Paul Reuben

  • Intelligent method, apparatus and computer program product for automated refreshing of internet web pages

    Cary Lee Bates;Paul Reuben Day

  • Ordering of database search results based on user feedback

    Cary Lee Bates;Paul Reuben Day;John Matthew Santosuosso

  • Automated detection/resumption of interrupted television programs

    Cary Lee Bates;Paul Reuben Day;John Matthew Santosuosso

  • Method and meeting scheduler for automated meeting insertion and rescheduling for busy calendars

    Brian John Cragun;Paul Reuben Day

  • Method and device for displaying hypertext document

    Lee Bates Cary;Luben D Paul;ケアリー・リー・ベイツ;ポール・リューベン・デイ

  • Web server apparatus and method for virus checking

    Cary Lee Bates;Paul Reuben Day;John Matthew Santosuosso

  • Censoring browser method and apparatus for internet viewing

    Brian John Cragun;Paul Reuben Day

  • Computer system and method of displaying update status of linked hypertext documents

    Cary L. Bates;Paul R. Day

  • Automated spell analysis

    Cary Lee Bates;Brian John Cragun;Paul Reuben Day;John Matthew Santosuosso

  • Method and computer program product for implementing parental supervision for internet browsing

    Cary Lee Bates;Brian John Cragun;Paul Reuben Day

  • Computer system, user interface component and method utilizing non-linear scroll bar

    Cary L. Bates;Paul R. Day

  • Educational spell checker

    Cary Lee Bates;Paul Reuben Day

  • Method and apparatus for audible presentation of web page content

    Cary Lee Bates;Paul Reuben Day;John Matthew Santosuosso

  • Method and system for predicting and managing undesirable electronic mail

    Cary Lee Bates;Paul Reuben Day;John Matthew Santosuosso

  • Computer system and method of displaying hypertext documents with internal hypertext link definitions

    Cary L. Bates;Paul R. Day

  • Virus checking and reporting for computer database search results

    Cary Lee Bates;Robert James Crenshaw;Paul Reuben Day;John Matthew Santosuosso

  • Window scroll-bar

    Cary Lee Bates;Paul Reuben Day;Jeffrey Michael Ryan

  • Copy/paste mechanism and paste buffer that includes source information for copied data

    Cary Lee Bates;Paul Reuben Day;John Matthew Santosuosso

Frequent Co-Authors

Cary Lee Bates
Cary Lee Bates IBM (United States)
John Matthew Santosuosso
John Matthew Santosuosso IBM (United States)
Brian John Cragun
Brian John Cragun IBM (United States)
Eric L. Barsness
Eric L. Barsness IBM (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens up diverse academic and career options, with online learning offering increased accessibility and flexibility. If you wish to continue your education, there are opportunities such as some of the cheapest online PhD programs in technology-related fields. These allow driven students to reach the highest levels of academia at a manageable cost.

For those aiming to accelerate their journey, consider pursuing the shortest EdD program online or exploring flexible options to advance quickly. If you are starting out, the best associate degrees offer foundational skills and can often be completed in as little as six months.

Computer Science also aligns well with business and management roles. Accredited options like online business degree programs accredited provide versatile skills employers seek in today’s digital economy, expanding your career pathways beyond coding and development.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Reuben Day

Recently Published Articles