| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 47 | 1247 | 557 | 137 | 11337 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Paul C. Fife between 1954 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul C. Fife published across 72 years, from 1954 to 2025, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 1979. 3 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.
164 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 1 |
| 1955 | 0 |
| 1956 | 0 |
| 1957 | 0 |
| 1958 | 0 |
| 1959 | 0 |
| 1960 | 0 |
| 1961 | 2 |
| 1962 | 0 |
| 1963 | 1 |
| 1964 | 1 |
| 1965 | 2 |
| 1966 | 3 |
| 1967 | 0 |
| 1968 | 3 |
| 1969 | 1 |
| 1970 | 1 |
| 1971 | 1 |
| 1972 | 1 |
| 1973 | 3 |
| 1974 | 2 |
| 1975 | 3 |
| 1976 | 2 |
| 1977 | 5 |
| 1978 | 2 |
| 1979 | 13 |
| 1980 | 5 |
| 1981 | 5 |
| 1982 | 5 |
| 1983 | 1 |
| 1984 | 4 |
| 1985 | 1 |
| 1986 | 5 |
| 1987 | 4 |
| 1988 | 9 |
| 1989 | 3 |
| 1990 | 3 |
| 1991 | 2 |
| 1992 | 4 |
| 1993 | 3 |
| 1994 | 2 |
| 1995 | 3 |
| 1996 | 2 |
| 1997 | 7 |
| 1998 | 4 |
| 1999 | 3 |
| 2000 | 1 |
| 2001 | 3 |
| 2002 | 3 |
| 2003 | 4 |
| 2004 | 0 |
| 2005 | 9 |
| 2006 | 1 |
| 2007 | 6 |
| 2008 | 1 |
| 2009 | 6 |
| 2010 | 2 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 2 |
| 2024 | 1 |
| 2025 | 2 |
| Total | 164 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul C. Fife sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 137 publications — 31st percentile
31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 42–46 | 3 | |
| 47–51 | 5 | |
| 52–56 | 7 | |
| 57–61 | 20 | |
| 62–66 | 14 | |
| 67–71 | 25 | |
| 72–76 | 19 | |
| 77–81 | 35 | |
| 82–86 | 50 | |
| 87–91 | 60 | |
| 92–96 | 86 | |
| 97–101 | 84 | |
| 102–106 | 83 | |
| 107–111 | 90 | |
| 112–116 | 99 | |
| 117–121 | 90 | |
| 122–126 | 91 | |
| 127–131 | 109 | |
| 132–136 | 110 | |
| 137–141 | 98 | 137 |
| 142–146 | 112 | |
| 147–151 | 102 | |
| 152–156 | 88 | |
| 157–161 | 106 | |
| 162–166 | 83 | |
| 167–171 | 102 | |
| 172–176 | 77 | |
| 177–181 | 81 | |
| 182–186 | 78 | |
| 187–191 | 71 | |
| 192–196 | 92 | |
| 197–201 | 64 | |
| 202–206 | 69 | |
| 207–211 | 64 | |
| 212–216 | 62 | |
| 217–221 | 58 | |
| 222–226 | 53 | |
| 227–231 | 50 | |
| 232–236 | 46 | |
| 237–241 | 46 | |
| 242–246 | 46 | |
| 247–251 | 43 | |
| 252–256 | 29 | |
| 257–261 | 45 | |
| 262–266 | 30 | |
| 267–271 | 33 | |
| 272–276 | 34 | |
| 277–281 | 30 | |
| 282–286 | 31 | |
| 287–291 | 21 | |
| 292–296 | 34 | |
| 297–301 | 26 | |
| 302–306 | 10 | |
| 307–311 | 17 | |
| 312–316 | 23 | |
| 317–321 | 13 | |
| 322–326 | 16 | |
| 327–331 | 26 | |
| 332–336 | 13 | |
| 337–341 | 13 | |
| 342–346 | 16 | |
| 347–351 | 17 | |
| 352–356 | 12 | |
| 357–361 | 18 | |
| 362–366 | 18 | |
| 367–371 | 9 | |
| 372–376 | 11 | |
| 377–381 | 8 | |
| 382–386 | 8 | |
| 387–391 | 9 | |
| 392–396 | 9 | |
| 397–401 | 8 | |
| 402–406 | 11 | |
| 407–411 | 6 | |
| 412–416 | 6 | |
| 417–421 | 9 | |
| 422–426 | 8 | |
| 427–431 | 5 | |
| 432–436 | 8 | |
| 437–441 | 8 | |
| 442–446 | 4 | |
| 447–451 | 4 | |
| 452–456 | 4 | |
| 457–461 | 2 | |
| 462–466 | 2 | |
| 467–471 | 4 | |
| 472–476 | 3 | |
| 477–481 | 3 | |
| 482–486 | 6 | |
| 487–491 | 3 | |
| 492–496 | 5 | |
| 497–501 | 5 | |
| 502–506 | 1 | |
| 507–511 | 6 | |
| 512–516 | 4 | |
| 517–521 | 1 | |
| 522–526 | 3 | |
| 527–531 | 1 | |
| 532–536 | 4 | |
| 537+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul C. Fife sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 47 D-Index — 66th percentile
66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 174 | |
| 31 | 151 | |
| 32 | 174 | |
| 33 | 117 | |
| 34 | 136 | |
| 35 | 127 | |
| 36 | 145 | |
| 37 | 153 | |
| 38 | 150 | |
| 39 | 150 | |
| 40 | 138 | |
| 41 | 136 | |
| 42 | 93 | |
| 43 | 108 | |
| 44 | 115 | |
| 45 | 112 | |
| 46 | 103 | |
| 47 | 75 | 47 |
| 48 | 59 | |
| 49 | 67 | |
| 50 | 60 | |
| 51 | 57 | |
| 52 | 59 | |
| 53 | 62 | |
| 54 | 60 | |
| 55 | 50 | |
| 56 | 42 | |
| 57 | 54 | |
| 58 | 50 | |
| 59 | 42 | |
| 60 | 41 | |
| 61 | 35 | |
| 62 | 40 | |
| 63 | 21 | |
| 64 | 31 | |
| 65 | 27 | |
| 66 | 29 | |
| 67 | 19 | |
| 68 | 25 | |
| 69 | 17 | |
| 70 | 18 | |
| 71 | 12 | |
| 72 | 14 | |
| 73 | 13 | |
| 74 | 18 | |
| 75 | 9 | |
| 76 | 11 | |
| 77 | 10 | |
| 78 | 9 | |
| 79 | 16 | |
| 80 | 12 | |
| 81 | 10 | |
| 82 | 5 | |
| 83 | 5 | |
| 84 | 13 | |
| 85 | 6 | |
| 86+ | 99 |
Paul C. Fife was affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research primarily spanned the field of Engineering, with contributions in several subfields including Computational Mechanics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Information Systems and Management, Management Science and Operations Research, and Computer Networks and Communications.
The scientist's recent publications covered diverse topics and exemplified interdisciplinary research. Notable papers included:
Their work addressed multiple research topics such as Technology Adoption and User Behaviour, Psychometric Methodologies and Testing, Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques, Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), AI in Service Interactions, Human-Animal Interaction Studies, and Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows.
Frequent coauthors of Paul C. Fife included James Gaskin, Warren Rosengren, Paul Benjamin Lowry, B.D. Nichols, and Alfred Amendolara. The scientist published in various venues, including the Information Systems Journal, Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, arXiv (Cornell University), OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information), and the Journal of Osteopathic Medicine.
In recognition of professional distinction, Paul C. Fife was named a Fellow of the American Mathematical Society in 2013.
Unknown
O. Penrose;P. C. Fife
Peter W. Bates;Paul C. Fife;Xiaofeng Ren;Xuefeng Wang
Paul Fife
P. C. Fife;P. C. Fife;L. A. Peletier;L. A. Peletier
G. Caginalp;P. C. Fife
Gunduz Caginalp;Paul Fife
Paul C. Fife
Peter W. Bates;Paul C. Fife
Min Ming Tang;Min Ming Tang;Paul C. Fife;Paul C. Fife
Paul C. Fife
Paul C. Fife;J. B. McLeod
C. Carrillo;P. Fife
Oliver Penrose;Paul C. Fife
J. Klewicki;P. Fife;T. Wei
Gunduz Caginalp;Paul Fife
Unknown
Ha Dang;Paul C. Fife;L. A. Peletier
Paul C. Fife
P. W. Bates;P. C. Fife;P. C. Fife
Paul C. Fife;Oliver Penrose
Melvyn S. Berger;Paul C. Fife
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities. For instance, a master in data analytics is a natural complement to mathematical skills, focusing on interpreting complex data sets and making informed decisions in various industries.
If you’re considering a management angle, several easiest MBA specialization options provide flexible paths for mathematical professionals seeking leadership roles. These programs help develop crucial business acumen without overwhelming workload demands.
More so, the rise of easiest online MBA programs offers the convenience of remote study, ideal for working professionals or students balancing multiple commitments. This accessibility broadens the reach of advanced education in business and management fields.
For those aiming at top executive roles, DBA online programs provide advanced doctoral-level training focused on business administration. These programs combine rigorous research with practical application, making them a strong choice for mathematicians interested in strategic leadership.