World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
11994
World Ranking
5288
National Ranking
2436

Patrick Lincoln publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Lincoln sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 167 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Patrick Lincoln D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Lincoln sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick Lincoln is affiliated with SRI International in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science, with a specialization in several subfields including Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, notably:

  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Topic Modeling
  • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Software Engineering Research

Patrick Lincoln's recent publications demonstrate an engagement with both theoretical and applied research. Their papers include:

  • "Neuro Symbolic Reasoning for Planning: Counterexample Guided Inductive Synthesis using Large Language Models and Satisfiability Solving," published in 2023 by arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Formal Methods at Scale," published in 2022 by IEEE Security & Privacy
  • "Using the En-ROADS future climate simulator," published in 2023 by The Physics Teacher

These publications indicate involvement in advanced AI techniques, formal verification methods, and applications of simulation models in education.

The scientist has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, reflecting interdisciplinary teamwork and research diversity. These collaborators include:

  • William J. Martin
  • William L. Scherlis
  • Sumit Kumar Jha
  • Susmit Jha
  • Nathaniel D. Bastian

Patrick Lincoln's research has appeared in multiple well-regarded venues. The most frequent publication outlets are:

  • IEEE Security & Privacy
  • The Physics Teacher
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • All About Maude - A High-Performance Logical Framework: How to Specify, Program, and Verify Systems in Rewriting Logic

    Manuel Clavel;Francisco Durán;Steven Eker;Patrick Lincoln

  • Maude: specification and programming in rewriting logic

    Manuel Clavel;Francisco Durán;Steven Eker;Patrick Lincoln

  • Architectural support for copy and tamper-resistant software

    David Lie Chandramohan Thekkath;Mark Mitchell;Patrick Lincoln;Dan Boneh

  • The Maude 2.0 system

    Manuel Clavel;Francisco Duran;Steven Eker;Patrick Lincoln

  • Decision problems for propositional linear logic

    Patrick Lincoln;Patrick Lincoln;John C. Mitchell;Andre Scedrov;Natarajan Shankar

  • Principles of Maude

    Manuel Clavel;Steven Eker;Patrick Lincoln;José Meseguer

  • A meta-notation for protocol analysis

    I. Cervesato;N.A. Durgin;P.D. Lincoln;J.C. Mitchell

  • Efficient implementation of lattice operations

    Hassan Aït-Kaci;Robert Boyer;Patrick Lincoln;Roger Nasr

  • A probabilistic poly-time framework for protocol analysis

    P. Lincoln;J. Mitchell;M. Mitchell;A. Scedrov

  • Stochastic assembly of sublithographic nanoscale interfaces

    A. DeHon;P. Lincoln;J.E. Savage

  • Multiset rewriting and the complexity of bounded security protocols

    Nancy Durgin;Patrick Lincoln;John Mitchell;Andre Scedrov

  • Systems and methods for negotiated resource utilization

    Patrick Lincoln;Steven Dawson;David Stringer-Calvert

  • PATHWAY LOGIC: SYMBOLIC ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL SIGNALING

    Steven Eker;Merrill Knapp;Keith Laderoute;Patrick Lincoln

  • Method, system and device for inferring a mobile user's current context and proactively providing assistance

    Kenneth C. Nitz;Patrick D. Lincoln;Karen L. Myers;Hung H. Bui

  • Methods and apparatus for scalable, distributed management of virtual private networks

    David W. J. Stringer-Calvert;Steven Mark Dawson;Patrick D. Lincoln

  • Providing virtual personal assistance with multiple VPA applications

    Kenneth C. Nitz;Patrick D. Lincoln

  • Privacy-preserving sharing and correction of security alerts

    Patrick Lincoln;Phillip Porras;Vitally Shmatikov

  • System and method using information based indicia for securing and authenticating transactions

    Patrick D. Lincoln;Natarajan Shankar

  • Pathway Logic: Executable Models of Biological Networks

    Steven Eker;Merrill Knapp;Keith Laderoute;Patrick Lincoln

  • Nonphotolithographic nanoscale memory density prospects

    A. DeHon;S.C. Goldstein;P.J. Kuekes;P. Lincoln

  • Decision problems for propositional linear logic

    P. Lincoln;J. Michell;A. Scedrov;N. Shankar

  • Linear logic

    Patrick Lincoln

Frequent Co-Authors

José Meseguer
José Meseguer University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Carolyn L. Talcott
Carolyn L. Talcott SRI International
John C. Mitchell
John C. Mitchell Stanford University
Andre Scedrov
Andre Scedrov University of Pennsylvania
Natarajan Shankar
Natarajan Shankar SRI International
Phillip Porras
Phillip Porras SRI International
Pierangela Samarati
Pierangela Samarati University of Milan
John Rushby
John Rushby SRI International
André DeHon
André DeHon University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s worth exploring a variety of related online degrees and career options. Fields such as online cybersecurity master's programs are especially popular, reflecting the rising demand for skilled cybersecurity professionals. These programs often offer flexible learning and strong job prospects.

Many students also choose to specialize further or diversify their skills by considering degrees outside traditional tech roles. For example, construction management is increasingly reliant on digital tools and project management software, making it an attractive pathway for those with a computer science background.

There are also options like an online criminal justice degree, which integrates technology in areas such as forensic computing and cybersecurity. Similarly, understanding the cost of accounting degree can help you plan a future blending finance, analytics, and technology.

Exploring these related pathways can open up diverse and rewarding career opportunities beyond core computer science roles.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Lincoln

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles