World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 51 5288 5139 2436 2352 167 11994

Patrick Lincoln publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patrick Lincoln between 1987 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patrick Lincoln published across 37 years, from 1987 to 2023, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2007. 5 of the 188 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2007. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 4 publications
1987 2023

188 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patrick Lincoln: publications per year, 1987 to 2023
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 1
1991 0
1992 8
1993 3
1994 6
1995 4
1996 5
1997 2
1998 3
1999 7
2000 16
2001 5
2002 11
2003 22
2004 7
2005 6
2006 5
2007 27
2008 1
2009 3
2010 3
2011 3
2012 6
2013 3
2014 7
2015 6
2016 2
2017 2
2018 4
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
2023 4
Total 188
Download as CSV

Patrick Lincoln publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Lincoln sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 162–171 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 167 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534 167
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Patrick Lincoln D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Lincoln sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543 51
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Patrick Lincoln is affiliated with SRI International in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science, with a specialization in several subfields including Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, notably:

  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Topic Modeling
  • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Software Engineering Research

Patrick Lincoln's recent publications demonstrate an engagement with both theoretical and applied research. Their papers include:

  • "Neuro Symbolic Reasoning for Planning: Counterexample Guided Inductive Synthesis using Large Language Models and Satisfiability Solving," published in 2023 by arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Formal Methods at Scale," published in 2022 by IEEE Security & Privacy
  • "Using the En-ROADS future climate simulator," published in 2023 by The Physics Teacher

These publications indicate involvement in advanced AI techniques, formal verification methods, and applications of simulation models in education.

The scientist has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, reflecting interdisciplinary teamwork and research diversity. These collaborators include:

  • William J. Martin
  • William L. Scherlis
  • Sumit Kumar Jha
  • Susmit Jha
  • Nathaniel D. Bastian

Patrick Lincoln's research has appeared in multiple well-regarded venues. The most frequent publication outlets are:

  • IEEE Security & Privacy
  • The Physics Teacher
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • All About Maude - A High-Performance Logical Framework: How to Specify, Program, and Verify Systems in Rewriting Logic

    Manuel Clavel;Francisco Durán;Steven Eker;Patrick Lincoln

  • Maude: specification and programming in rewriting logic

    Manuel Clavel;Francisco Durán;Steven Eker;Patrick Lincoln

  • Architectural support for copy and tamper-resistant software

    David Lie Chandramohan Thekkath;Mark Mitchell;Patrick Lincoln;Dan Boneh

  • The Maude 2.0 system

    Manuel Clavel;Francisco Duran;Steven Eker;Patrick Lincoln

  • Decision problems for propositional linear logic

    Patrick Lincoln;Patrick Lincoln;John C. Mitchell;Andre Scedrov;Natarajan Shankar

  • Principles of Maude

    Manuel Clavel;Steven Eker;Patrick Lincoln;José Meseguer

  • A meta-notation for protocol analysis

    I. Cervesato;N.A. Durgin;P.D. Lincoln;J.C. Mitchell

  • Efficient implementation of lattice operations

    Hassan Aït-Kaci;Robert Boyer;Patrick Lincoln;Roger Nasr

  • A probabilistic poly-time framework for protocol analysis

    P. Lincoln;J. Mitchell;M. Mitchell;A. Scedrov

  • Stochastic assembly of sublithographic nanoscale interfaces

    A. DeHon;P. Lincoln;J.E. Savage

  • Multiset rewriting and the complexity of bounded security protocols

    Nancy Durgin;Patrick Lincoln;John Mitchell;Andre Scedrov

  • Systems and methods for negotiated resource utilization

    Patrick Lincoln;Steven Dawson;David Stringer-Calvert

  • PATHWAY LOGIC: SYMBOLIC ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL SIGNALING

    Steven Eker;Merrill Knapp;Keith Laderoute;Patrick Lincoln

  • Method, system and device for inferring a mobile user's current context and proactively providing assistance

    Kenneth C. Nitz;Patrick D. Lincoln;Karen L. Myers;Hung H. Bui

  • Methods and apparatus for scalable, distributed management of virtual private networks

    David W. J. Stringer-Calvert;Steven Mark Dawson;Patrick D. Lincoln

  • Providing virtual personal assistance with multiple VPA applications

    Kenneth C. Nitz;Patrick D. Lincoln

  • Privacy-preserving sharing and correction of security alerts

    Patrick Lincoln;Phillip Porras;Vitally Shmatikov

  • System and method using information based indicia for securing and authenticating transactions

    Patrick D. Lincoln;Natarajan Shankar

  • Pathway Logic: Executable Models of Biological Networks

    Steven Eker;Merrill Knapp;Keith Laderoute;Patrick Lincoln

  • Nonphotolithographic nanoscale memory density prospects

    A. DeHon;S.C. Goldstein;P.J. Kuekes;P. Lincoln

  • Decision problems for propositional linear logic

    P. Lincoln;J. Michell;A. Scedrov;N. Shankar

  • Linear logic

    Patrick Lincoln

Frequent Co-Authors

José Meseguer
José Meseguer University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Carolyn L. Talcott
Carolyn L. Talcott SRI International
John C. Mitchell
John C. Mitchell Stanford University
Andre Scedrov
Andre Scedrov University of Pennsylvania
Natarajan Shankar
Natarajan Shankar SRI International
Phillip Porras
Phillip Porras SRI International
Pierangela Samarati
Pierangela Samarati University of Milan
John Rushby
John Rushby SRI International
André DeHon
André DeHon University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s worth exploring a variety of related online degrees and career options. Fields such as online cybersecurity master's programs are especially popular, reflecting the rising demand for skilled cybersecurity professionals. These programs often offer flexible learning and strong job prospects.

Many students also choose to specialize further or diversify their skills by considering degrees outside traditional tech roles. For example, construction management is increasingly reliant on digital tools and project management software, making it an attractive pathway for those with a computer science background.

There are also options like an online criminal justice degree, which integrates technology in areas such as forensic computing and cybersecurity. Similarly, understanding the cost of accounting degree can help you plan a future blending finance, analytics, and technology.

Exploring these related pathways can open up diverse and rewarding career opportunities beyond core computer science roles.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Lincoln

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles