World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrice Chartrand

Patrice Chartrand

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
36
Citations
11459
World Ranking
8550
National Ranking
344

Patrice Chartrand publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrice Chartrand sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 181 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Patrice Chartrand D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrice Chartrand sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrice Chartrand is affiliated with Polytechnique Montréal in Canada and has contributed extensively to fields related to engineering and materials science. Their research primarily focuses on mechanical engineering and materials chemistry, with additional work in fluid flow and transfer processes, electrical and electronic engineering, and biomedical engineering.

Their main scientific topics cover:

  • Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
  • Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
  • Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
  • Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
  • Nuclear Materials and Properties
  • Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys
  • Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Calphad
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B
  • Solar Energy
  • Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Patrice Chartrand highlight a range of topics in thermodynamics, phase relationships, and energy materials. Notable publications are:

  • "Thermodynamics and phase relationship of carbonaceous mesophase appearing during coal tar pitch carbonization" (2020) published in Fuel
  • "Development of a molten salt thermal conductivity model and database for advanced energy systems" (2023) published in Solar Energy
  • "Coherent and para-equilibrium phase transformations in Mn-doped-LiFePO4 cathode materials: Implications for lithium ion battery performances" (2020) published in Journal of Alloys and Compounds
  • "Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of CuCrO2 and CuCr2O4: Experimental Investigation and Phase Equilibria Modeling of the Cu-Cr-O System" (2021) published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
  • "A theoretical framework for reliable predictions of thermal conductivity of multicomponent molten salt mixtures: KCl-NaCl-MgCl2 as a case study" (2021) published in Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells

Patrice Chartrand has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Aïmen E. Gheribi
  • Anh Thu Phan
  • Huiqiang Yang
  • Sara Benalia
  • Christian Robelin

Best Publications

  • FactSage thermochemical software and databases

    C.W. Bale;P. Chartrand;S.A. Degterov;G. Eriksson

  • FactSage thermochemical software and databases, 2010–2016

    C.W. Bale;E. Bélisle;P. Chartrand;S.A. Decterov

  • FactSage thermochemical software and databases - recent developments

    Christopher Bale;Eve Belisle;Patrice Chartrand;Sergei Decterov

  • Reprint of: FactSage thermochemical software and databases, 2010–2016

    C.W. Bale;E. Bélisle;P. Chartrand;S.A. Decterov

  • The modified quasi-chemical model: Part II. Multicomponent solutions

    Arthur D. Pelton;Patrice Chartrand

  • The modified quasi-chemical model: Part IV. Two-sublattice quadruplet approximation

    Arthur D. Pelton;Patrice Chartrand;Gunnar Eriksson

  • The modified quasi-chemical model : Part III. Two sublattices

    Patrice Chartrand;Arthur D. Pelton

  • Towards a comprehensive thermodynamic database for ash-forming elements in biomass and waste combustion — Current situation and future developments

    Daniel Lindberg;Rainer Backman;Patrice Chartrand;Mikko Hupa

  • Critical evaluation and thermodynamic optimization of the Al–Ce, Al–Y, Al–Sc and Mg–Sc binary systems

    Youn-Bae Kang;Arthur D. Pelton;Patrice Chartrand;Carlton D. Fuerst

  • On the choice of “Geometric” thermodynamic models

    Patrice Chartrand;Arthur D. Pelton

  • Thermodynamic evaluation and optimization of the LiCl-NaCl-KCl-RbCl-CsCl-MgCl2-CaCl2 system using the modified quasi-chemical model

    Arthur D. Pelton;Patrice Chartrand

  • Thermodynamic evaluation and optimization of the LiF-NaF-KF-MgF2-CaF2 system using the modified quasi-chemical model

    Patrice Chartrand;Arthur D. Pelton

  • Recommended values for the thermal conductivity of molten salts between the melting and boiling points

    Aïmen E. Gheribi;Jesus A. Torres;Patrice Chartrand

  • Critical evaluation and optimization of the thermodynamic properties and phase diagrams of the Al-Mg, Al-Sr, Mg-Sr, and Al-Mg-Sr systems

    P. Chartrand;A. D. Pelton

  • Thermodynamic evaluation and optimization of the (NaCl + KCl + MgCl2 + CaCl2 + ZnCl2) system

    Christian Robelin;Patrice Chartrand

  • Thermodynamic evaluations and optimizations of binary Mg-light Rare Earth (La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm) systems

    Youn-Bae Kang;Liling Jin;Patrice Chartrand;Aïmen E. Gheribi

  • Thermodynamic evaluation and optimization of Al-La, Al-Ce, Al-Pr, Al-Nd and Al-Sm systems using the Modified Quasichemical Model for liquids

    Liling Jin;Youn-Bae Kang;Patrice Chartrand;Carlton D. Fuerst

  • Thermodynamic evaluation and optimization of Al-Gd, Al-Tb, Al-Dy, Al-Ho and Al-Er systems using a Modified Quasichemical Model for the liquid

    Liling Jin;Youn-Bae Kang;Patrice Chartrand;Carlton D. Fuerst

  • Thermodynamic evaluation and optimization of the (NaCl + KCl + AlCl3) system

    Christian Robelin;Patrice Chartrand;Arthur D. Pelton

  • Thermodynamic evaluation and optimization of the (NaCl + Na2SO4 + Na2Co3 + KCl + K2SO4 + K2CO3) system

    Daniel Lindberg;Rainer Backman;Rainer Backman;Patrice Chartrand

  • Thermodynamic evaluation and optimization of the Li, Na, K, Mg, Ca//F, Cl reciprocal system using the modified quasi-chemical model

    Patrice Chartrand;Arthur D. Pelton

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur D. Pelton
Arthur D. Pelton Polytechnique Montréal
In-Ho Jung
In-Ho Jung Seoul National University
Mamoun Medraj
Mamoun Medraj Concordia University
Mathieu Salanne
Mathieu Salanne Sorbonne University
Paul A. Madden
Paul A. Madden University of Oxford
Mikko Hupa
Mikko Hupa Åbo Akademi University
Marc Monthioux
Marc Monthioux Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Xiaoqin Zeng
Xiaoqin Zeng Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Tsun-Kong Sham
Tsun-Kong Sham University of Western Ontario
Xueliang Sun
Xueliang Sun University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to diverse career options. Many students enhance their technical qualifications with skills from other fields to broaden their career prospects. For those considering leadership or business roles alongside engineering, pursuing an online mba programs no gmat can offer valuable flexibility—eliminating standardized test barriers while allowing you to study remotely.

Affordability is another key factor. Programs such as the best online mba under 30k strike a balance between quality education and cost-effectiveness, making advanced study more accessible for international students and working professionals alike.

As digital transformation accelerates, technical graduates may also benefit from creative fields like marketing. Earning a social media marketing degree online can help engineers contribute to powerful digital campaigns or manage tech brands’ online presence.

Additionally, for those eyeing the thriving service sector, a hotel and restaurant management degree online offers rapid pathways into hospitality, equipping graduates for leadership roles in tourism, event management, or tech-driven customer experiences.

Best Scientists Citing Patrice Chartrand

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles