World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
68
Citations
13132
World Ranking
2801
National Ranking
114

Paolo Livrea publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Livrea sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 304 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Paolo Livrea D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Livrea sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paolo Livrea is affiliated with the University of Bari Aldo Moro in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and medicine, with notable contributions in neurology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, physiology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Neuroscience and neuropharmacology research
  • Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments
  • Dementia and cognitive impairment research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Genetic neurodegenerative diseases

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Paolo Livrea include:

  • Paolo Flace
  • Diana Galletta
  • Antonella Bizzoca
  • Gianfranco Gennarini
  • Gianpaolo Antonio Basile

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Paolo Livrea are:

  • "The Cerebellar Dopaminergic System" (2021), published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
  • "Current Challenges in the Diagnosis of Progressive Neurocognitive Disorders: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Primary and Secondary Care" (2023), published in Brain Sciences
  • "An Immunohistochemical Analysis on The Human Cerebellar Dopaminergic System" (2020), published in Research Square (Research Square)
  • "A candidate projective neuron type of the cerebellar cortex: the synarmotic neuron" (2024), published in European Journal of Histochemistry

The publication venues where Paolo Livrea's work frequently appears include:

  • Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
  • Brain Sciences
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • European Journal of Histochemistry

Best Publications

  • Risk factors for clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease A case‐control study of an Italian population

    L A Amaducci;L Fratiglioni;W A Rocca;C Fieschi

  • Course and prognosis in early-onset MS Comparison with adult-onset forms

    I. L. Simone;D. Carrara;C. Tortorella;M. Liguori

  • New natural history of interferon‐β–treated relapsing multiple sclerosis

    Maria Trojano;Fabio Pellegrini;Aurora Fuiani;Damiano Paolicelli

  • Soluble beta-amyloid1-40 induces NMDA-dependent degradation of postsynaptic density-95 at glutamatergic synapses

    F. Roselli;M. Tirard;J. Lu;P. Hutzler

  • Epidemiology of primary dystonia

    Giovanni Defazio;Giovanni Abbruzzese;Paolo Livrea;Alfredo Berardelli

  • Age-related disability in multiple sclerosis.

    Maria Trojano;Maria Liguori;Giovanni Bosco Zimatore;Roberto Bugarini

  • Botulinum toxin A treatment for primary hemifacial spasm: A 10-year multicenter study

    Giovanni Defazio;Giovanni Abbruzzese;Paolo Girlanda;Laura Vacca

  • Brain atrophy and lesion load in a large population of patients with multiple sclerosis

    G. Tedeschi;L. Lavorgna;P. Russo;A. Prinster

  • Serum MMP-2 and MMP-9 are elevated in different multiple sclerosis subtypes

    Carlo Avolio;Maddalena Ruggieri;Fabrizio Giuliani;Grazia Maria Liuzzi

  • Whole-Brain and Regional Brain Atrophy in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

    D.M. Mezzapesa;A. Ceccarelli;F. Dicuonzo;A. Carella

  • Elevated cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light levels in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a possible marker of disease severity and progression.

    R. Tortelli;M. Ruggieri;R. Cortese;E. D'Errico

  • Multivariate analysis of predictive factors of multiple sclerosis course with a validated method to assess clinical events.

    M Trojano;C Avolio;C Manzari;A Calò

  • Reversible Cognitive Frailty, Dementia, and All-Cause Mortality. The Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging

    Vincenzo Solfrizzi;Emanuele Scafato;Davide Seripa;Madia Lozupone

  • Real‐life impact of early interferonβ therapy in relapsing multiple sclerosis

    Maria Trojano;F. Pellegrini;D. Paolicelli;A. Fuiani

  • Prevalence of Chronic Diseases in Older Italians: Comparing Self-Reported and Clinical Diagnoses THE ITALIAN LONGITUDINAL STUDY ON AGING WORKING GROUP*

    Stefania Maggi;Livia Candelise;Elio Scarpini;Nadia Minicuci

  • Correlation between fatigue and brain atrophy and lesion load in multiple sclerosis patients independent of disability

    Gioacchino Tedeschi;Daria Dinacci;Luigi Lavorgna;Anna Prinster

  • Rate of MMSE score change in Alzheimer's disease: influence of education and vascular risk factors.

    Francesco Roselli;Bruno Tartaglione;Francesco Federico;Vito Lepore

  • Changes of serum sICAM-1 and MMP-9 induced by rIFNβ-1b treatment in relapsing-remitting MS

    M. Trojano;C. Avolio;G.M. Liuzzi;M. Ruggieri

  • Possible risk factors for primary adult onset dystonia: a case-control investigation by the Italian Movement Disorders Study Group

    Giovanni Defazio;A Berardelli;G Abbruzzese;Lepore

  • Intrathecal synthesis of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in patients with multiple sclerosis: implication for pathogenesis.

    G M Liuzzi;M Trojano;M Fanelli;C Avolio

  • Fatigue in Parkinson's disease.

    A. Zenzola;G. Masi;M. De Mari;G. Defazio

Frequent Co-Authors

Maria Trojano
Maria Trojano University of Bari Aldo Moro
Marina de Tommaso
Marina de Tommaso University of Bari Aldo Moro
Davide Martino
Davide Martino University of Calgary
Alfredo Berardelli
Alfredo Berardelli Sapienza University of Rome
Giancarlo Logroscino
Giancarlo Logroscino University of Bari Aldo Moro
Giovanni Abbruzzese
Giovanni Abbruzzese University of Genoa
Paolo Girlanda
Paolo Girlanda University of Messina
Domenico Inzitari
Domenico Inzitari University of Florence
Antonio Currà
Antonio Currà Sapienza University of Rome
Giulio E. Lancioni
Giulio E. Lancioni University of Bari Aldo Moro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often means considering a range of online degrees in related fields. For those interested in foundational aspects of behavior and the brain, an online psychology degree can provide a versatile starting point. Psychology and neuroscience frequently overlap, especially in areas like cognitive processes and mental health.

Students focused on social work and clinical practice may also consider the easiest online msw program. These programs prepare graduates to support individuals facing mental health challenges, a skill set that complements neuroscientific understanding.

For advanced clinical roles, an online psyd program prepares students for professional practice in psychology, emphasizing applied training over research. Alternatively, those interested in counseling, particularly relationships and family systems, might explore online mft programs accredited for streamlined, focused coursework.

Each of these pathways offers flexible learning opportunities while building essential skills for neuroscience-adjacent professions. Choosing the right option depends on your long-term career interests and how deeply you wish to focus on research, clinical practice, or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Paolo Livrea

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles