What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Igneous rock
- Basalt
- Plate tectonics
His primary scientific interests are in Geochemistry, Mantle, Partial melting, Zircon and Mineralogy.
His Geochemistry research includes elements of Subduction and Rift.
His Mantle research incorporates themes from Mantle plume, Plate tectonics, Mantle convection and Transition zone.
His Partial melting study combines topics in areas such as Mineral redox buffer, Chondrite and Igneous differentiation.
His study in the field of Hafnium isotope also crosses realms of Laser ablation, Lutetium and Hafnium.
His Mineralogy study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Metamorphic rock, Igneous rock and Analytical chemistry.
His most cited work include:
- Hafnium isotope characterization of the GJ-1 zircon reference material by solution and laser-ablation MC-ICPMS (493 citations)
- Evaluation of the 87Rb decay constant by age comparison against the U-Pb system (128 citations)
- Evaluation of the 87Rb decay constant by age comparison against the U-Pb system (128 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Oliver Nebel focuses on Geochemistry, Mantle, Archean, Subduction and Zircon.
His study in Crust, Partial melting, Basalt, Igneous differentiation and Peridotite is done as part of Geochemistry.
His Basalt study also includes fields such as
- Igneous rock which intersects with area such as Mineralogy,
- Radiogenic nuclide, which have a strong connection to Isotope dilution.
His Mantle research includes themes of Mantle plume, Mantle wedge and Transition zone.
Oliver Nebel has researched Subduction in several fields, including Slab and Plate tectonics.
His Zircon study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Geochronology and Terrane.
He most often published in these fields:
- Geochemistry (76.87%)
- Mantle (45.52%)
- Archean (16.42%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?
- Geochemistry (76.87%)
- Mantle (45.52%)
- Radiogenic nuclide (13.43%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary scientific interests are in Geochemistry, Mantle, Radiogenic nuclide, Craton and Lithosphere.
His work in Basalt, Zircon, Peridotite, Crust and Igneous rock are all subfields of Geochemistry research.
His studies examine the connections between Basalt and genetics, as well as such issues in Isotope fractionation, with regards to Igneous differentiation.
Specifically, his work in Mantle is concerned with the study of Partial melting.
In his study, Theoretical physics is strongly linked to Archean, which falls under the umbrella field of Craton.
His Lithosphere research integrates issues from Subduction, Early Earth, Petrology and Plate tectonics.
Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Decoupled U-Pb date and chemical zonation of monazite in migmatites: The case for disturbance of isotopic systematics by coupled dissolution-reprecipitation (10 citations)
- North Atlantic Craton architecture revealed by kimberlite-hosted crustal zircons (7 citations)
- An Early Cretaceous subduction-modified mantle underneath the ultraslow spreading Gakkel Ridge, Arctic Ocean. (4 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Igneous rock
- Basalt
- Plate tectonics
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Geochemistry, Radiogenic nuclide, Peridotite, Lithosphere and Subduction.
His Mantle, Basalt and Zircon study are his primary interests in Geochemistry.
His studies deal with areas such as Gneiss, Craton and Archean as well as Zircon.
The various areas that Oliver Nebel examines in his Peridotite study include Eclogite, Crust, Ocean island basalt and Isotope fractionation, Equilibrium fractionation.
Oliver Nebel has included themes like Volcano, Intraplate earthquake, Volcanism, Transition zone and Slab in his Lithosphere study.
His work deals with themes such as Seafloor spreading, Petrology, Plate tectonics and Cretaceous, which intersect with Subduction.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
