World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
12520
World Ranking
5249
National Ranking
33

Nils Henrik Diemer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nils Henrik Diemer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 163 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Nils Henrik Diemer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nils Henrik Diemer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nils Henrik Diemer is a researcher affiliated with the University of Southern Denmark in Denmark. Their academic work spans various areas within the scientific community, contributing to the knowledge base of their institution and field.

Although specific details regarding research papers, co-authors, or publication venues are not provided, Diemer's association with a recognized university indicates involvement in scholarly activities and academic research.

The absence of listed publications, topics of work, and fields of study suggests a profile that may be emerging or focused on internal or interdisciplinary research projects. This aligns with the trend in academic environments to engage in ongoing development beyond public dissemination.

There is no record of awards, book publications, or documented frequent collaboration networks, which may reflect a career stage or a specific research focus not oriented toward these outputs.

Overall, the profile of Nils Henrik Diemer reflects a research professional based at a European university whose detailed contributions to specific scientific domains remain to be publicly highlighted.

Best Publications

  • Elevation of the extracellular concentrations of glutamate and aspartate in rat hippocampus during transient cerebral ischemia monitored by intracerebral microdialysis

    Helene Benveniste;Jørgen Drejer;Arne Schousboe;Nils H. Diemer

  • Cellular origin of ischemia-induced glutamate release from brain tissue in vivo and in vitro

    Jørgen Drejer;Helene Benveniste;Nils H. Diemer;Arne Schousboe

  • Selective neuron loss after cerebral ischemia in the rat: Possible role of transmitter glutamate

    Martin Balslev Jørgensen;Nils Henrik Diemer

  • Possible role of zinc in the selective degeneration of dentate hilar neurons after cerebral ischemia in the adult rat.

    N. Tønder;F.F. Johansen;C.J. Frederickson;J. Zimmer

  • Microglial and Astroglial Reactions to Ischemic and Kainic Acid-Induced Lesions of the Adult Rat Hippocampus

    Martin B. Jørgensen;Bente R. Finsen;Michael B. Jensen;Bernardo Castellano

  • Experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage: subarachnoid blood volume, mortality rate, neuronal death, cerebral blood flow, and perfusion pressure in three different rat models.

    Giselle Fabiana Prunell;Tiit Mathiesen;Nils Henrik Diemer;Niels-Aage Svendgaard

  • Comparative Regional Analysis of 2-Fluorodeoxyglucose and Methylglucose Uptake in Brain of Four Stroke Patients. With Special Reference to the Regional Estimation of the Lumped Constant

    Albert Gjedde;Klaus Wienhard;Wolf-Dieter Heiss;Gerd Kloster

  • Exercise-Induced Changes in Local Cerebral Glucose Utilization in the Rat:

    John Vissing;Martin Andersen;Nils H. Diemer

  • Microglia and macrophages are major sources of locally produced transforming growth factor‐β1 after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats

    Elin Lehrmann;Reinhard Kiefer;Thomas Christensen;Klaus V. Toyka

  • Focal Ischemia of the Rat Brain: Autoradiographic Determination of Cerebral Glucose Utilization, Glucose Content, and Blood Flow:

    Nedergaard M;Gjedde A;Diemer Nh

  • Hypoxia-Ischemia in the Neonatal Rat Brain: Histopathology after Post-Treatment with NMDA and Non NMDA Receptor Antagonists

    Henrik Hagberg;Eric Gilland;Nils-Henrik Diemer;Peter Andiné

  • Autoradiographic Determination of Regional Brain Glucose Content

    Albert Gjedde;Nils Henrik Diemer

  • Microglial MHC antigen expression after ischemic and kainic acid lesions of the adult rat hippocampus.

    B.R. Finsen;Martin Balslev Jørgensen;Nils Henrik Diemer;J. Zimmer

  • Microglial and macrophage reactions mark progressive changes and define the penumbra in the rat neocortex and striatum after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion.

    Elin Lehrmann;Thomas Christensen;Jens Zimmer;Nils Henrik Diemer

  • Cytokines in cerebral ischemia: Expression of transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-β1) mRNA in the postischemic adult rat hippocampus

    Elin Lehrmann;Reinhard Kiefer;Bente Finsen;Nils H. Diemer

  • A rat model of reproducible cerebral infarction using thrombotic blood clot emboli.

    Karsten Overgaard;Tomas Sereghy;Gudrun Boysen;Hans Pedersen

  • Cytology of human cerebro-spinal fluid after cardiac arrest.

    Eugeniusz Siemkowicz;Nils Henrik Diemer

  • Removal of the entorhinal cortex protects hippocampal CA-1 neurons from ischemic damage.

    M. B. Jørgensen;F. F. Johansen;N. H. Diemer

  • Ischemic CA-1 pyramidal cell loss is prevented by preischemic colchicine destruction of dentate gyrus granule cells

    Johansen Ff;Jørgensen Mb;Diemer Nh

  • Cellular reactions to implantation of a microdialysis tube in the rat hippocampus

    Unknown

  • Protection against ischemic hippocampal CAI damage in the rat with a new non‐NMDA antagonist, NBQX

    N. H. Diemer;M. B. Jørgensen;F. F. Johansen;M. Sheardown

  • Early loss of somatostatin neurons in dentate hilus after cerebral ischemia in the rat precedes CA-1 pyramidal cell loss

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Arne Schousboe
Arne Schousboe University of Copenhagen
Albert Gjedde
Albert Gjedde University of Copenhagen
Povl Krogsgaard-Larsen
Povl Krogsgaard-Larsen University of Copenhagen
Nicolas G. Bazan
Nicolas G. Bazan Louisiana State University
Hans-Peter Hartung
Hans-Peter Hartung Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Bernardo Castellano
Bernardo Castellano Autonomous University of Barcelona
David R. Curtis
David R. Curtis Australian National University
Andreas Draguhn
Andreas Draguhn Heidelberg University
Gitta Wörtwein
Gitta Wörtwein University of Copenhagen
David P.D. Woldbye
David P.D. Woldbye University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Neuroscience opens up diverse opportunities in healthcare, research, technology, and education. Many students are interested in finding the most lucrative college majors to maximize their earning potential after graduation. Neuroscience often appears on these lists, especially when combined with other disciplines such as computer science or data analysis.

For those seeking flexibility and affordability, exploring online schools that accept fafsa can make advanced education more accessible. These programs can help reduce financial barriers while providing quality instruction.

Adding to your qualifications through online courses with certificates is another way to stand out in a competitive job market. Certifications in areas like data science, psychology, or biotechnology can complement your neuroscience background.

If you’re looking to get started quickly or with minimal financial investment, consider the cheapest easiest online degree options for foundational studies. These degrees can provide a pathway into neuroscience-related fields or be a stepping stone toward more advanced qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing Nils Henrik Diemer

Recently Published Articles