World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
3831
World Ranking
9372
National Ranking
3956

Neil G. Harris publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil G. Harris sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 90 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Neil G. Harris D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil G. Harris sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neil G. Harris is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and neuroscience, covering 61 and 20 publications respectively. Within these broad fields, their subfields of study include neurology, epidemiology, cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and emergency medicine.

Their work concentrates on key topics such as:

  • Traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances
  • Traumatic brain injury research
  • Advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications
  • Cardiac arrest and resuscitation
  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced MRI techniques and applications

Neil G. Harris has frequently published in venues including bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Epilepsia, Neurotrauma Reports, Epilepsy Research, and Journal of Neurotrauma. These reflect the scientist's engagement with topics spanning neurotrauma, epilepsy, and brain imaging.

Frequent coauthors who have contributed collaboratively with Harris include Richard J. Staba, Cesar Santana-Gomez, Olli Gröhn, Riikka Immonen, and David Wright.

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Oxytocin normalizes altered circuit connectivity for social rescue of the Cntnap2 knockout mouse," 2021, Neuron
  • "Pre-Clinical Common Data Elements for Traumatic Brain Injury Research: Progress and Use Cases," 2020, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • "Topographical reorganization of brain functional connectivity during an early period of epileptogenesis," 2021, Epilepsia
  • "The BDNF mimetic R-13 attenuates TBI pathogenesis using TrkB-related pathways and bioenergetics," 2023, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease
  • "Successful harmonization in EpiBioS4Rx biomarker study on post-traumatic epilepsy paves the way towards powered preclinical multicenter studies," 2023, Epilepsy Research

Best Publications

  • Time course of cellular pathology after controlled cortical impact injury.

    S Chen;J D Pickard;N G Harris

  • Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Cerebral Blood Flow: A PET Study of Baseline Values:

    Brian K Owler;Brian K Owler;Shahan Momjian;Zofia Czosnyka;Marek Czosnyka

  • Upregulation of Pentose Phosphate Pathway and Preservation of Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle Flux after Experimental Brain Injury

    Brenda L. Bartnik;Richard L. Sutton;Masamichi Fukushima;Neil G. Harris

  • MRI uncovers disrupted hippocampal microstructure that underlies memory impairments after early-life adversity.

    Jenny Molet;Pamela M Maras;Eli Kinney-Lang;Eli Kinney-Lang;Neil G Harris

  • Ketogenic diet prevents alterations in brain metabolism in young but not adult rats after traumatic brain injury.

    Ying Deng-Bryant;Mayumi L. Prins;David A. Hovda;Neil G. Harris

  • Oxytocin normalizes altered circuit connectivity for social rescue of the Cntnap2 knockout mouse

    Unknown

  • Disconnection and hyper-connectivity underlie reorganization after TBI: A rodent functional connectomic analysis.

    N.G. Harris;D.R. Verley;B.A. Gutman;P.M. Thompson

  • Hitting a moving target: Basic mechanisms of recovery from acquired developmental brain injury.

    Christopher C. Giza;Bryan Kolb;Neil G. Harris;Robert F. Asarnow

  • Changes in Cerebral Blood Flow during Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure Manipulation in Patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Methodological Study:

    Brian K Owler;Brian K Owler;Alonso Pena;Shahan Momjian;Zofia Czosnyka

  • Communicating hydrocephalus: the biomechanics of progressive ventricular enlargement revisited.

    A. Peña;N. G. Harris;M. D. Bolton;M. Czosnyka

  • Positron emission tomography using 18F‐labelled endothelin‐1 reveals prevention of binding to cardiac receptors owing to tissue‐specific clearance by ETB receptors in vivo

    Peter Johnström;Tim D Fryer;Hugh K Richards;Neil G Harris

  • Pericontusion axon sprouting is spatially and temporally consistent with a growth-permissive environment after traumatic brain injury.

    Neil G. Harris;Yevgeniya A. Mironova;David A. Hovda;Richard L. Sutton

  • Inosine promotes recovery of skilled motor function in a model of focal brain injury.

    Justin M. Smith;Precious Lunga;David Story;Neil Harris

  • Bi-directional changes in fractional anisotropy after experiment TBI: Disorganization and reorganization?

    Neil G. Harris;D. R. Verley;Boris A. Gutman;R. L. Sutton

  • Traumatic brain injury results in disparate regions of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan expression that are temporally limited.

    N.G. Harris;S.T. Carmichael;D.A. Hovda;R.L. Sutton

  • The cerebral cortex in congenital hydrocephalus in the H-Tx rat: a quantitative light microscopy study.

    H. C. Jones;R. M. Bucknall;N. G. Harris

  • Relationship between flow-metabolism uncoupling and evolving axonal injury after experimental traumatic brain injury.

    Szu-Fu Chen;Hugh K Richards;Piotr Smielewski;Peter Johnström

  • Chondroitinase ABC enhances pericontusion axonal sprouting but does not confer robust improvements in behavioral recovery.

    Neil G. Harris;Yevgeniya A. Mironova;David A. Hovda;Richard L. Sutton

  • MRI measurement of blood-brain barrier permeability following spontaneous reperfusion in the starch microsphere model of ischemia

    Neil G Harris;Victoria Gauden;Paul A Fraser;Stephen R Williams

  • CO2 cerebrovascular reactivity as a function of perfusion pressure — a modelling study

    M. Czosnyka;M. Czosnyka;N. G. Harris;J. D. Pickard;S. Piechnik

  • Neuroimaging of animal models of brain disease.

    Mark F Lythgoe;Nicola R Sibson;Neil G Harris

Frequent Co-Authors

John D. Pickard
John D. Pickard University of Cambridge
David A. Hovda
David A. Hovda University of California, Los Angeles
Marek Czosnyka
Marek Czosnyka University of Cambridge
Tim D. Fryer
Tim D. Fryer University of Cambridge
Anthony P. Davenport
Anthony P. Davenport University of Cambridge
William H. McBride
William H. McBride University of California, Los Angeles
Jonathan Lifshitz
Jonathan Lifshitz University of Arizona
C. Edward Dixon
C. Edward Dixon University of Pittsburgh
Olli Gröhn
Olli Gröhn University of Eastern Finland
Robert F. Asarnow
Robert F. Asarnow University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in neuroscience opens doors to a variety of related fields. Many students enhance their neuroscience background with programs in psychology, counseling, and social work. For those seeking to accelerate their education, there are accelerated psychology degree online options that provide a fast track to understanding human behavior and mental processes.

For students interested in the intersection of social work and neuroscience, several 1 year msw programs online offer a flexible path to a Master of Social Work degree, enabling graduates to enter the workforce quickly. Counseling is another complementary field; aspiring counselors can take advantage of the online masters counseling programs to build expertise in mental health support.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. If cost is a significant factor, be sure to explore the most affordable online masters in mental health counseling programs, which are both accessible and CACREP-accredited. Exploring these pathways can help students find the right fit for their career goals and educational needs.

Best Scientists Citing Neil G. Harris

Trending Scientists