World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
25
Citations
2506
World Ranking
1627
National Ranking
45

Nathalie Giger publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathalie Giger sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 63 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Nathalie Giger D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathalie Giger sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 25 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment: Blame avoidance or credit claiming in the era of permanent austerity?

    Unknown

  • Conditional Punishment: A Comparative Analysis of the Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Retrenchment in OECD Nations, 1980–2003

    Klaus Armingeon;Nathalie Giger

  • THE POOR POLITICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE POOR IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

    Unknown

  • Holding governments accountable? Individual heterogeneity in performance voting

    Catherine E. de Vries;Nathalie Giger

  • Voting Against Your Constituents? How Lobbying Affects Representation

    Nathalie Giger;Heike Klüver

  • Towards a modern gender gap in Europe?

    Unknown

  • Mind the gap: Do proportional electoral systems foster a more equal representation of women and men, poor and rich?

    Unknown

  • More Money, Fewer Problems? Cross-Level Effects of Economic Deprivation on Political Representation

    Unknown

  • Strategic Ambiguity of Party Positions in Multi-Party Competition*

    Thomas Bräuninger;Nathalie Giger

  • The Welfare State or the Economy? Preferences, Constituencies, and Strategies for Retrenchment

    Unknown

  • Who Leads the Party? On Membership Size, Selectorates and Party Oligarchy

    Unknown

  • Social status, political priorities and unequal representation

    Denise Traber;Miriam Hänni;Nathalie Giger;Christian Breunig

  • The Diminishing Value of Representing the Disadvantaged : Between Group Representation and Individual Career Paths

    Stefanie Bailer;Christian Breunig;Nathalie Giger;Andreas M. Wüst

  • Is Social Policy Retrenchment Unpopular? How Welfare Reforms Affect Government Popularity

    Unknown

  • I the People? Self-Interest and Demand for Government Responsiveness

    Unknown

  • How economic crises affect political representation: declining party‒voter congruence in times of constrained government

    Denise Traber;Nathalie Giger;Silja Häusermann

  • Salience‐Based Congruence Between Parties & their Voters: The Swiss Case

    Unknown

  • The Risk of Social Policy?: The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment and social policy performance in OECD countries

    Unknown

  • The gender gap in same-gender voting: The role of context

    Nathalie Giger;Anne Maria Holli;Zoe Lefkofridi;Hanna Wass

  • Policy or person? What voters want from their representatives on Twitter

    Nathalie Giger;Nathalie Giger;Stefanie Bailer;Adrian Sutter;Tomas Turner-Zwinkels

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Nathalie Giger

Recently Published Articles