World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
41
Citations
6766
World Ranking
1916
National Ranking
820

Michael T. Lacey publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael T. Lacey sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 196 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Michael T. Lacey D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael T. Lacey sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Mathematical Society
  • 2004 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Michael T. Lacey is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States and specializes in mathematics. Their research spans a range of fields within mathematics, with a primary focus on applied mathematics, mathematical physics, algebra and number theory, discrete mathematics and combinatorics, and numerical analysis.

Their work covers several main topics, including advanced harmonic analysis research, mathematical analysis and transform methods, analytic number theory research, holomorphic and operator theory, advanced mathematical physics problems, limits and structures in graph theory, and spectral theory in mathematical physics.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Functional Analysis
  • Indiana University Mathematics Journal
  • Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
  • Kidney International

Michael T. Lacey frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Their common coauthors are:

  • Ji Li
  • Brett D. Wick
  • Hamed Mousavi
  • Yaghoub Rahimi
  • Rui Han

Notable recent publications include:

  • "Commutators of Cauchy-Szego type integrals for domains in C^n with minimal smoothness," 2021, Indiana University Mathematics Journal
  • "Random ergodic theorems with universally representative sequences," 2021, UNC Libraries
  • "Compactness of commutator of Riesz transforms in the two weight setting," 2021, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
  • "ℓp-Improving Inequalities for Discrete Spherical Averages," 2020, Analysis Mathematica
  • "Averages Along the Primes: Improving and Sparse Bounds," 2020, Concrete Operators

Michael T. Lacey has been recognized as a Fellow by the American Mathematical Society in 2013 and as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 2004.

Best Publications

  • $L^p$ estimates on the bilinear Hilbert transform for $2 < p < \infty$

    Michael Lacey;Christoph Thiele

  • The solution of the Kato square root problem for second order elliptic operators on Rn

    Pascal Auscher;Steve Hofmann;Michael Lacey;Alan McIntosh

  • On Calderon s conjecture

    Michael Lacey;Christoph Thiele

  • A note on the almost sure central limit theorem

    Michael T. Lacey;Walter Philipp

  • A characterization of product BMO by commutators

    Sarah H. Ferguson;Michael T. Lacey

  • An elementary proof of the A 2 bound

    Michael T. Lacey

  • A proof of boundedness of the Carleson operator

    Michael Lacey;Christoph Thiele

  • An elementary proof of the $A_2$ Bound

    Michael T. Lacey

  • On Calder'on's conjecture

    Michael Lacey;Christoph Thiele

  • Sharp A2 inequality for Haar shift operators

    Michael T. Lacey;Stefanie Petermichl;Maria Carmen Reguera

  • On the Small Ball Inequality in all dimensions

    Dmitriy Bilyk;Michael T. Lacey;Armen Vagharshakyan

  • SHARP WEIGHTED BOUNDS FOR FRACTIONAL INTEGRAL OPERATORS

    Michael T. Lacey;Kabe Moen;Carlos Pérez;Rodolfo H. Torres

  • Two Weight Inequalities for Discrete Positive Operators

    Michael T. Lacey;Eric T. Sawyer;Ignacio Uriarte-Tuero

  • The bilinear maximal functions map into L^p for 2/3 < p <= 1

    Michael T. Lacey

  • Two Weight Inequality for the Hilbert Transform: A Real Variable Characterization, II

    Michael T. Lacey;Eric T. Sawyer;Chun-Yen Shen;Ignacio Uriarte-Tuero

  • Two-weight inequality for the hilbert transform: A real variable characterization, I

    Michael T. Lacey;Eric T. Sawyer;Chun Yen Shen;Ignacio Uriarte-Tuero

  • Commutators in the two-weight setting

    Irina Holmes;Michael T. Lacey;Brett D. Wick

  • Sharp weighted bounds for the q-variation of singular integrals

    Tuomas P. Hytönen;Michael T. Lacey;Carlos Pérez

  • The Solution of the Kato Problem for Divergence Form Elliptic Operators with Gaussian Heat Kernel Bounds

    Steve Hofmann;Michael Lacey;Alan McIntosh

  • Maximal theorems for the directional Hilbert transform on the plane

    Michael T. Lacey;Xiaochun Li;Xiaochun Li

  • Non-probabilistic proof of the A_2 theorem, and sharp weighted bounds for the q-variation of singular integrals

    Tuomas P. Hytönen;Michael T. Lacey;Carlos Pérez

  • Sharp $ A_2$ Inequality for Haar Shift Operators

    Michael T. Lacey;Stefanie Petermichl;Maria Carmen Reguera

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric T. Sawyer
Eric T. Sawyer McMaster University
Tuomas Hytönen
Tuomas Hytönen Aalto University
Xiaochun Li
Xiaochun Li University of California, Los Angeles
Jill Pipher
Jill Pipher Brown University
Terence Tao
Terence Tao University of California, Los Angeles
Alan McIntosh
Alan McIntosh Australian National University
Carlos Pérez
Carlos Pérez University of the Basque Country
Steve Hofmann
Steve Hofmann University of Missouri
Rodolfo H. Torres
Rodolfo H. Torres University of California, Riverside
Walter Philipp
Walter Philipp University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, several online degrees can complement their skillset and open diverse career opportunities. Many opt for fast-track programs like the shortest online MBA, which offers business acumen alongside analytical expertise. These accelerated degrees save time while providing valuable management skills.

Cost is another crucial factor when considering further education. Programs like the ms in digital marketing degree cost usa highlight affordable options that still lead to lucrative careers. Budget-friendly online degrees make it easier for math graduates to diversify their qualifications without excessive financial strain.

If you prefer condensed study periods, the 1 year mba programs are an excellent option. They allow you to earn a full business degree quickly, making career transitions or advancements more accessible and efficient for math majors.

Additionally, many online programs offer transfer credits, simplifying the process for students with previous college work. Exploring the best online mba programs that accept transfer credits can reduce the time and cost of earning your degree, allowing a smoother path into new career trajectories.

Best Scientists Citing Michael T. Lacey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles