World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 33 9428 698 49 5587

Michael Armstrong-James publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Armstrong-James between 1970 and 2015, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Armstrong-James published across 46 years, from 1970 to 2015, averaging 1.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 1988. 1 of the 49 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2015. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 1988. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 4 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 5 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication
1970 2015

49 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Armstrong-James: publications per year, 1970 to 2015
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 1
1980 4
1981 2
1982 2
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 5
1989 0
1990 1
1991 2
1992 3
1993 4
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 4
2005 2
2006 1
2007 1
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
Total 49
Download as CSV

Michael Armstrong-James publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Armstrong-James sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 48–57 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 49 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79 49
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Armstrong-James D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Armstrong-James sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172 33
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael Armstrong-James is affiliated with Queen Mary University of London in the United Kingdom. This association places them within an academic environment known for research and education in various scientific disciplines.

There is no publicly available record of recent papers authored by Armstrong-James, nor is there information on frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or awards. Additionally, no data detailing their main fields of study, subfields, or research topics has been provided.

The lack of specific research outputs or thematic areas in the available data means that the precise scope and focus of Armstrong-James's work remain undisclosed within this profile.

Despite limited detailed information, Armstrong-James's professional position at Queen Mary University of London suggests involvement in research and academic activities associated with this institution.

Best Publications

  • Flow of excitation within rat barrel cortex on striking a single vibrissa.

    M. Armstrong-James;K. Fox;A. Das-Gupta

  • Spatiotemporal convergence and divergence in the rat S1 "barrel" cortex.

    Michael Armstrong‐James;Kevin Fox

  • Carbon fibre microelectrodes

    Unknown

  • Experience-dependent plasticity in adult rat barrel cortex.

    Mathew E. Diamond;Michael Armstrong-James;Ford F. Ebner

  • Somatic sensory responses in the rostral sector of the posterior group (POm) and in the ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM) of the rat thalamus : dependence on the barrel field cortex

    Mathew E. Diamond;Michael Armstrong-James;Matthew J. Budway;Ford F. Ebner

  • Somatic sensory responses in the rostral sector of the posterior group (POm) and in the ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM) of the rat thalamus.

    Mathew E. Diamond;Michael Armstrong-James;Ford F. Ebner

  • The contribution of NMDA and non-NMDA receptors to fast and slow transmission of sensory information in the rat SI barrel cortex.

    M Armstrong-James;E Welker;CA Callahan

  • Thalamo-cortical processing of vibrissal information in the rat. I. Intracortical origins of surround but not centre-receptive fields of layer IV neurones in the rat S1 barrel field cortex.

    Michael Armstrong-James;Christopher A. Callahan;Michael A. Friedman

  • An innocuous bias in whisker use in adult rats modifies receptive fields of barrel cortex neurons.

    M Armstrong-James;ME Diamond;FF Ebner

  • Thalamo-cortical processing of vibrissal information in the rat. II. spatiotemporal convergence in the thalamic ventroposterior medial nucleus (VPm) and its relevance to generation of receptive fields of S1 cortical "barrel" neurones.

    Michael Armstrong-James;Christopher A. Callahan

  • Effects of ionophoresed noradrenaline on the spontaneous activity of neurones in rat primary somatosensory cortex.

    M Armstrong-James;K Fox

  • Altered Sensory Processing in the Somatosensory Cortex of the Mouse Mutant Barrelless

    E. Welker;M. Armstrong-James;G. Bronchti;W. Ourednik

  • The functional status and columnar organization of single cells responding to cutaneous stimulation in neonatal rat somatosensory cortex S1.

    Unknown

  • Experience-dependent plasticity of adult rat S1 cortex requires local NMDA receptor activation

    V. Rema;M. Armstrong-James;F. F. Ebner

  • The Mode of Activation of a Barrel Column: Response Properties of Single Units in the Somatosensory Cortex of the Mouse upon Whisker Deflection

    E. Welker;M. Armstrong-James;H. Van der Loos;R. Kraftsik

  • Influence of anesthesia on spontaneous activity and receptive field size of single units in rat Sm1 neocortex

    Unknown

  • Intracortical processes regulating the integration of sensory information.

    Ford F. Ebner;Michael A. Armstrong-James

  • A method for etching the tips of carbon fibre microelectrodes

    Unknown

  • Contribution of Supragranular Layers to Sensory Processing and Plasticity in Adult Rat Barrel Cortex

    Wei Huang;Michael Armstrong-James;V. Rema;Mathew E. Diamond

  • The Nature and Plasticity of Sensory Processing within Adult Rat Barrel Cortex

    Michael Armstrong-James

  • Experience-dependent plasticity is impaired in adult rat barrel cortex after whiskers are unused in early postnatal life.

    V. Rema;Michael Armstrong-James;Michael Armstrong-James;Ford F. Ebner

  • Modulation of neostriatal activity by iontophoresis of ascorbic acid

    Thomas W. Gardiner;Michael Armstrong-James;A. Woodburn Caan;R. Mark Wightman

  • Short exposure to an enriched environment accelerates plasticity in the barrel cortex of adult rats.

    V. Rema;M. Armstrong-James;N. Jenkinson;F.F. Ebner

  • Modified Sensory Processing in the Barrel Cortex of the Adult Mouse After Chronic Whisker Stimulation

    Charles Quairiaux;Michael Armstrong-James;Egbert Welker

  • Quantitative studies of postnatal changes in synapses in rat superficial motor cerebral cortex

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Ford F. Ebner
Ford F. Ebner Vanderbilt University
Mathew E. Diamond
Mathew E. Diamond International School for Advanced Studies
Kevin Fox
Kevin Fox Cardiff University
Egbert Welker
Egbert Welker University of Lausanne
Christopher I. Moore
Christopher I. Moore Brown University
Friedhelm C. Hummel
Friedhelm C. Hummel École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Jon H. Kaas
Jon H. Kaas Vanderbilt University
Ned Jenkinson
Ned Jenkinson University of Birmingham
Malgorzata Kossut
Malgorzata Kossut Polish Academy of Sciences
Reha S. Erzurumlu
Reha S. Erzurumlu University of Maryland, Baltimore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience often inspires students to consider various online degrees. A cheap online psychology degree can be a practical first step—these programs are widely available, flexible, and help students build a strong foundation in human behavior.

For those drawn to social work or clinical roles, it’s important to ask how long does it take to get a msw online. Most online MSW programs can be completed in two years, but some accelerated tracks may offer even quicker pathways to a rewarding career in mental health support.

If your interests align with advanced clinical practice or research, an online psyd program could be a perfect fit. These programs are designed for those pursuing licensure as psychologists and combine rigorous academics with practical field experience.

Another in-demand specialty is marriage and family therapy. Flexible online marriage and family therapy programs help graduates quickly enter this fulfilling field, enabling them to make a difference in family dynamics and mental wellness.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Armstrong-James

Recently Published Articles