World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
11532
World Ranking
6597
National Ranking
156

Egbert Welker publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Egbert Welker sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 72 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Egbert Welker D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Egbert Welker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Egbert Welker is affiliated with the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. The available data do not contain details about specific research fields, papers, co-authors, or topics associated with their work. There are no recent papers or publication records linked to this scientist in the data provided.

Due to the lack of documented research output, there is no information about frequent publication venues or book publications by Egbert Welker. Similarly, there are no records of awards or honors associated with this researcher.

The absence of detailed information on main fields of study or subfields suggests that a comprehensive academic profile based on available data sources cannot be constructed at this time.

Best Publications

  • Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex

    Joshua T. Trachtenberg;Brian E. Chen;Graham W. Knott;Guoping Feng

  • Experience-dependent and cell-type-specific spine growth in the neocortex.

    Anthony Holtmaat;Linda Wilbrecht;Graham W. Knott;Egbert Welker

  • Experience and activity-dependent maturation of perisomatic GABAergic innervation in primary visual cortex during a postnatal critical period.

    Bidisha Chattopadhyaya;Graziella Di Cristo;Hiroyuki Higashiyama;Graham W. Knott

  • Spine growth precedes synapse formation in the adult neocortex in vivo.

    Graham W Knott;Anthony Holtmaat;Linda Wilbrecht;Egbert Welker

  • Formation of dendritic spines with GABAergic synapses induced by whisker stimulation in adult mice.

    Graham W. Knott;Charles Quairiaux;Christel Genoud;Egbert Welker

  • Glial Glutamate Transporters Mediate a Functional Metabolic Crosstalk between Neurons and Astrocytes in the Mouse Developing Cortex

    Brigitte Voutsinos-Porche;Gilles Bonvento;Kohichi Tanaka;Pascal Steiner

  • Plasticity of Astrocytic Coverage and Glutamate Transporter Expression in Adult Mouse Cortex

    Christel Genoud;Charles Quairiaux;Pascal Steiner;Pascal Steiner;Harald Hirling

  • K+ Channel Expression Distinguishes Subpopulations of Parvalbumin- and Somatostatin-Containing Neocortical Interneurons

    A. Chow;A. Erisir;C. Farb;M. S. Nadal

  • A comparative analysis of the morphology of corticothalamic projections in mammals.

    Eric M Rouiller;Egbert Welker

  • Organization of the projections from barrel cortex to thalamus in mice studied with Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin and HRP.

    P. V. Hoogland;E. Welker;H. Van der Loos

  • Organization of feedback and feedforward projections of the barrel cortex: a PHA-L study in the mouse

    E. Welker;P. V. Hoogland;H. Van der Loos

  • Quantitative correlation between barrel-field size and the sensory innervation of the whiskerpad: a comparative study in six strains of mice bred for different patterns of mystacial vibrissae

    E Welker;H Van der Loos

  • Upregulation of BDNF mRNA Expression in the Barrel Cortex of Adult Mice after Sensory Stimulation

    Nativitat Rocamora;Egbert Welker;Marta Pascual;Eduardo Soriano

  • The contribution of NMDA and non-NMDA receptors to fast and slow transmission of sensory information in the rat SI barrel cortex.

    M Armstrong-James;E Welker;CA Callahan

  • PSD-95 promotes synaptogenesis and multiinnervated spine formation through nitric oxide signaling

    Irina Nikonenko;Irina Nikonenko;Bernadett Boda;Sylvain Steen;Graham Knott;Graham Knott

  • Membrane potential dynamics of neocortical projection neurons driving target-specific signals.

    Takayuki Yamashita;Aurélie Pala;Leticia Pedrido;Yves Kremer

  • Subcellular domain-restricted GABAergic innervation in primary visual cortex in the absence of sensory and thalamic inputs.

    Graziella Di Cristo;Caizhi Wu;Bidisha Chattopadhyaya;Bidisha Chattopadhyaya;Fabrice Ango

  • Plasticity in the barrel cortex of the adult mouse: effects of peripheral deprivation on GAD-immunoreactivity.

    E. Welker;E. Soriano;H. Van der Loos

  • Ultrastructure of giant and small thalamic terminals of cortical origin : a study of the projections from the barrel cortex in mice using Phaseolus vulgaris leuco-agglutinin (PHA-L)

    P. V. Hoogland;F. G. Wouterlood;E. Welker;H. Van der Loos

  • Morphology of corticothalamic terminals arising from the auditory cortex of the rat: a Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) tracing study.

    Eric M. Rouiller;Egbert Welker

  • Mutations in Eml1 lead to ectopic progenitors and neuronal heterotopia in mouse and human

    Michel Kielar;Françoise Phan Dinh Tuy;Sara Bizzotto;Cécile Lebrand

Frequent Co-Authors

Graham Knott
Graham Knott École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
H. Van der Loos
H. Van der Loos Johns Hopkins University
Karel Svoboda
Karel Svoboda Allen Institute
Eduardo Soriano
Eduardo Soriano University of Barcelona
Gilles Bonvento
Gilles Bonvento University of Paris-Saclay
Eric M. Rouiller
Eric M. Rouiller University of Fribourg
Anthony Holtmaat
Anthony Holtmaat University of Geneva
Beat M. Riederer
Beat M. Riederer University of Lausanne
Gérard Waeber
Gérard Waeber University of Lausanne
Joshua T. Trachtenberg
Joshua T. Trachtenberg University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Egbert Welker