World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
16771
World Ranking
8998
National Ranking
4767

Melissa T. Merrick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melissa T. Merrick sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 71 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Melissa T. Merrick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melissa T. Merrick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 Summary Report

    Michele Black;Kathleen Basile;Matthew Breiding;Sharon Smith

  • Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization--national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011.

    Matthew J. Breiding;Stephen G. Smith;Kathleen C. Basile;Mikel L. Walters

  • Prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences From the 2011-2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in 23 States.

    Melissa T Merrick;Derek C Ford;Katie A Ports;Angie S Guinn

  • The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey : 2015 data brief – updated release

    Sharon G. Smith;Xinjian Zhang;Kathleen C. Basile;Melissa T. Merrick

  • National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) : 2010-2012 state report

    Sharon G. Smith;Kathleen C. Basile;Leah K. Gilbert;Melissa T. Merrick

  • Unpacking the impact of adverse childhood experiences on adult mental health

    Melissa T. Merrick;Katie A. Ports;Derek C. Ford;Tracie O. Afifi

  • Adverse childhood experiences and life opportunities: shifting the narrative

    Marilyn Metzler;Melissa T. Merrick;Joanne Klevens;Katie A. Ports

  • Childhood Adversity and Adult Chronic Disease: An Update from Ten States and the District of Columbia, 2010

    Leah K. Gilbert;Matthew J. Breiding;Melissa T. Merrick;William W. Thompson

  • Vital Signs: Estimated Proportion of Adult Health Problems Attributable to Adverse Childhood Experiences and Implications for Prevention - 25 States, 2015-2017.

    Melissa T. Merrick;Derek C. Ford;Katie A. Ports;Angie S. Guinn

  • Adverse childhood experiences and sexual victimization in adulthood

    Katie A. Ports;Derek C. Ford;Melissa T. Merrick

  • Preventing child abuse and neglect: A technical package for policy, norm, and programmatic activities

    Beverly L. Fortson;Joanne Klevens;Melissa T. Merrick;Leah K. Gilbert

  • Examination of the factorial structure of adverse childhood experiences and recommendations for three subscale scores.

    Derek C. Ford;Melissa T. Merrick;Sharyn E. Parks;Matthew J. Breiding

  • Safe, Stable, Nurturing Relationships as a Moderator of Intergenerational Continuity of Child Maltreatment: A Meta-Analysis

    Thomas J. Schofield;Rosalyn D. Lee;Melissa T. Merrick

  • Spanking and adult mental health impairment: The case for the designation of spanking as an adverse childhood experience

    Tracie O. Afifi;Derek Ford;Elizabeth Thompson Gershoff;Melissa Merrick

  • The Association Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Risk of Cancer in Adulthood: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

    Dawn M. Holman;Katie A. Ports;Natasha D. Buchanan;Nikki A. Hawkins

  • Safe, stable, nurturing relationships break the intergenerational cycle of abuse: a prospective nationally representative cohort of children in the United Kingdom.

    Sara R. Jaffee;Sara R. Jaffee;Lucy Bowes;Isabelle Ouellet-Morin;Helen L. Fisher

  • Violence-Related Disparities Experienced by Black Youth and Young Adults: Opportunities for Prevention.

    Kameron J. Sheats;Shalon M. Irving;Jim A. Mercy;Thomas R. Simon

  • Identifying and Preventing Adverse Childhood Experiences: Implications for Clinical Practice

    Christopher M. Jones;Melissa T. Merrick;Debra E. Houry

  • Disrupting Intergenerational Continuity in Harsh and Abusive Parenting: The Importance of a Nurturing Relationship With a Romantic Partner

    Rand D. Conger;Thomas J. Schofield;Tricia K. Neppl;Melissa T. Merrick

  • Recognizing the cumulative burden of childhood adversities transforms science and practice for trauma and resilience.

    Sherry Hamby;Jessica H. L. Elm;Kathryn H. Howell;Melissa T. Merrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Kathleen C. Basile
Kathleen C. Basile Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Thomas R. Simon
Thomas R. Simon Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Sherry Hamby
Sherry Hamby Sewanee: The University of the South
David Finkelhor
David Finkelhor University of New Hampshire
Heather A. Turner
Heather A. Turner University of New Hampshire
William W. Thompson
William W. Thompson Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Sara R. Jaffee
Sara R. Jaffee University of Pennsylvania
Rand D. Conger
Rand D. Conger University of California, Davis
Elizabeth T. Gershoff
Elizabeth T. Gershoff The University of Texas at Austin
Terrie E. Moffitt
Terrie E. Moffitt Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Melissa T. Merrick

Recently Published Articles