World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 32 3114 2927 1058 940 100 6671

Mataz Alcoutlabi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mataz Alcoutlabi between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mataz Alcoutlabi published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2021. 10 of the 122 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2021. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 3 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
1998 2025

122 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mataz Alcoutlabi: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 3
2000 0
2001 0
2002 3
2003 3
2004 2
2005 1
2006 3
2007 0
2008 1
2009 2
2010 2
2011 9
2012 4
2013 4
2014 1
2015 3
2016 11
2017 7
2018 10
2019 8
2020 9
2021 16
2022 1
2023 8
2024 5
2025 5
Total 122
Download as CSV

Mataz Alcoutlabi publications per year - data summary

  • Mataz Alcoutlabi, a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scholar from The University of Texas at Austin, has 122 publications recorded across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1998 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 16 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1998, 2005, 2008, 2014 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 28 years in the span carry no publications at all (2000, 2001 and 2007).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.9 per year counting only the 25 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 35 publications, 29% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1998-2007: 16 publications (1.6 per year); 2008-2017: 44 publications (4.4 per year); 2018-2025: 62 publications (7.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Mataz Alcoutlabi publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mataz Alcoutlabi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 97–106 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 100 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91 100
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Mataz Alcoutlabi publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,445 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 63 ranges running from 47–56 to 659+ publications.
  • Mataz Alcoutlabi, a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scholar from The University of Texas at Austin, records 100 publications - the 7th percentile of the discipline.
  • 7% of ranked Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists score the same or lower than Mataz Alcoutlabi, and about 93% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 217–226 publications range, and Mataz Alcoutlabi ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 147–156 publications, holding 155 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 46% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 197–206 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 659 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Mataz Alcoutlabi D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mataz Alcoutlabi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144 32
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Mataz Alcoutlabi D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,445 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 64 ranges running from 30 to 93+ D-Index.
  • Mataz Alcoutlabi, a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scholar from The University of Texas at Austin, records 32 D-Index - the 10th percentile of the discipline.
  • 10% of ranked Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists score the same or lower than Mataz Alcoutlabi, and about 90% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 43 D-Index range, and Mataz Alcoutlabi ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 34 D-Index, holding 189 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 45 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Best Publications

  • Recent developments in nanostructured anode materials for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries

    Liwen Ji;Zhan Lin;Mataz Alcoutlabi;Xiangwu Zhang

  • Electrospun Nanofiber-Based Anodes, Cathodes, and Separators for Advanced Lithium-Ion Batteries

    Xiangwu Zhang;Liwen Ji;Ozan Toprakci;Yinzheng Liang

  • Graphene‐Based Nanocomposites for Energy Storage

    Liwen Ji;Praveen Meduri;Victor Agubra;Xingcheng Xiao

  • Rheological properties of cross-linked hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogels for tissue engineering.

    Janssen L. Vanderhooft;Mataz Alcoutlabi;Jules J. Magda;Glenn D. Prestwich

  • α-Fe2O3 nanoparticle-loaded carbon nanofibers as stable and high-capacity anodes for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries.

    Liwen Ji;Ozan Toprakci;Mataz Alcoutlabi;Yingfang Yao

  • Preparation and electrochemical characterization of ionic-conducting lithium lanthanum titanate oxide/polyacrylonitrile submicron composite fiber-based lithium-ion battery separators

    Yinzheng Liang;Yinzheng Liang;Liwen Ji;Bingkun Guo;Zhan Lin

  • Fibrous cellulose membrane mass produced via forcespinning ® for lithium-ion battery separators

    Baicheng Weng;Fenghua Xu;Mataz Alcoutlabi;Yuanbing Mao

  • Composite Nanofibers as Advanced Materials for Li-ion, Li-O2 and Li-S Batteries

    Unknown

  • Electrospun nanofiber‐coated separator membranes for lithium‐ion rechargeable batteries

    Hun Lee;Mataz Alcoutlabi;Jill V. Watson;Xiangwu Zhang

  • Structure control and performance improvement of carbon nanofibers containing a dispersion of silicon nanoparticles for energy storage

    Ying Li;Bingkun Guo;Liwen Ji;Zhan Lin

  • Forcespinning: A new method for the mass production of Sn/C composite nanofiber anodes for lithium ion batteries

    Unknown

  • Multichannel hollow structure for improved electrochemical performance of TiO2/Carbon composite nanofibers as anodes for lithium ion batteries

    Unknown

  • The Performance of SiO2 and TiO2 Nanoparticles as Lubricant Additives in Sunflower Oil

    Unknown

  • ForceSpinning of polyacrylonitrile for mass production of lithium‐ion battery separators

    Unknown

  • Preparation and properties of nanofiber-coated composite membranes as battery separators via electrospinning

    Mataz Alcoutlabi;Hun Lee;Jill V. Watson;Xiangwu Zhang

  • Application of fractional calculus to viscoelastic behaviour modelling and to the physical ageing phenomenon in glassy amorphous polymers

    Unknown

  • A comparative study on the performance of binary SnO2/NiO/C and Sn/C composite nanofibers as alternative anode materials for lithium ion batteries

    Unknown

  • Superacidic Electrospun Fiber‐Nafion Hybrid Proton Exchange Membranes

    Yingfang Yao;Zhan Lin;Ying Li;Mataz Alcoutlabi

  • Sulfonated polystyrene fiber network-induced hybrid proton exchange membranes.

    Yingfang Yao;Liwen Ji;Zhan Lin;Ying Li

  • The propagation of pressure in a gelled waxy oil pipeline as studied by particle imaging velocimetry

    Husam El-Gendy;Mataz Alcoutlabi;Mark Jemmett;Milind Deo

Frequent Co-Authors

Xiangwu Zhang
Xiangwu Zhang North Carolina State University
Gregory B. McKenna
Gregory B. McKenna Texas Tech University
Liwen Ji
Liwen Ji General Motors (United States)
Zhan Lin
Zhan Lin Guangdong University of Technology
Ying Li
Ying Li Texas A&M University
Karen Lozano
Karen Lozano The University of Texas at Austin
Bingkun Guo
Bingkun Guo Shanghai University
Timothy P. Lodge
Timothy P. Lodge University of Minnesota
Yuanbing Mao
Yuanbing Mao Illinois Institute of Technology
Xingcheng Xiao
Xingcheng Xiao General Motors (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While studying Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering offers a robust foundation in design and innovation, many students also explore complementary fields to broaden their career opportunities. For example, understanding human behavior can enhance teamwork and project management skills, making the fastest online masters in applied behavior analysis an intriguing option for those interested in blending engineering with behavioral sciences.

Another related path is in healthcare communication, where skills in articulation and language development are crucial. Aspiring professionals might look into speech language pathology graduate programs to understand the prerequisites and acceptance rates for entry, which can help plan educational goals with precision.

For convenience and accessibility, students often consider the easiest online slp programs to get into. These programs offer practical pathways to certification with more flexible admissions, fitting for those balancing demanding engineering coursework alongside other responsibilities.

Cost is always a consideration when choosing an online degree. Prospective students can assess the financial requirements by reviewing how much does an online speech pathology degree cost, ensuring they make informed decisions about their investment in education.

Best Scientists Citing Mataz Alcoutlabi

Recently Published Articles