World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Materials Science

D-Index
60
Citations
17540
World Ranking
6936
National Ranking
2053

Martin Stolterfoht publication distribution in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Materials Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Stolterfoht sits on this spectrum.

50–69 publications: 28 scientists 70–89 publications: 152 scientists 90–109 publications: 356 scientists 110–129 publications: 487 scientists 130–149 publications: 723 scientists 150–169 publications: 835 scientists 170–189 publications: 850 scientists 190–209 publications: 891 scientists 210–229 publications: 862 scientists 230–249 publications: 766 scientists 250–269 publications: 726 scientists 270–289 publications: 665 scientists 290–309 publications: 593 scientists 310–329 publications: 537 scientists 330–349 publications: 477 scientists 350–369 publications: 440 scientists 370–389 publications: 356 scientists 390–409 publications: 321 scientists 410–429 publications: 256 scientists 430–449 publications: 246 scientists 450–469 publications: 216 scientists 470–489 publications: 212 scientists 490–509 publications: 174 scientists 510–529 publications: 194 scientists 530–549 publications: 162 scientists 550–569 publications: 131 scientists 570–589 publications: 111 scientists 590–609 publications: 103 scientists 610–629 publications: 99 scientists 630–649 publications: 77 scientists 650–669 publications: 92 scientists 670–689 publications: 56 scientists 690–709 publications: 53 scientists 710–729 publications: 53 scientists 730–749 publications: 38 scientists 750–769 publications: 52 scientists 770–789 publications: 43 scientists 790–809 publications: 38 scientists 810–829 publications: 34 scientists 830–849 publications: 25 scientists 850–869 publications: 18 scientists 870–889 publications: 20 scientists 890–909 publications: 24 scientists 910–929 publications: 27 scientists 930–949 publications: 20 scientists 950–969 publications: 17 scientists 970–989 publications: 10 scientists 990–1,009 publications: 16 scientists 1,010–1,029 publications: 13 scientists 1,030–1,049 publications: 12 scientists 1,050–1,069 publications: 9 scientists 1,070–1,089 publications: 8 scientists 1,090–1,109 publications: 7 scientists 1,110–1,129 publications: 9 scientists 1,130–1,149 publications: 2 scientists 1,150–1,162 publications: 5 scientists 1,163+ publications: 100 scientists
50 publications 1,163+

This scientist: 163 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more.

Martin Stolterfoht D-index placement in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Materials Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Stolterfoht sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 211 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 450 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 612 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 612 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 598 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 657 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 667 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 621 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 597 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 610 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 587 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 606 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 533 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 490 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 469 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 378 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 421 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 359 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 323 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 299 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 230 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 210 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 195 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 203 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 175 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 175 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 142 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 121 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 117 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 107 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 88 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 85 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 68 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 62 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 57 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 45 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 49 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 50 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 34 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 38 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 28 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 24 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 33 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 28 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 20 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 23 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 17 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 12 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 17 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 21 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 13 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 11 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 13 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 4 scientists 164 D-Index: 3 scientists 165+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 165+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell with >29% efficiency by enhanced hole extraction

    Amran Al-Ashouri;Eike Köhnen;Bor Li;Artiom Magomedov

  • Minimizing buried interfacial defects for efficient inverted perovskite solar cells

    Unknown

  • Visualization and suppression of interfacial recombination for high-efficiency large-area pin perovskite solar cells

    Martin Stolterfoht;Christian Michael Wolff;Jose A. Marquez;Shanshan Zhang;Shanshan Zhang

  • The impact of energy alignment and interfacial recombination on the internal and external open-circuit voltage of perovskite solar cells

    Martin Stolterfoht;Pietro Caprioglio;Pietro Caprioglio;Christian M. Wolff;José A. Márquez

  • Improving interface quality for 1-cm^2 all-perovskite tandem solar cells

    Unknown

  • How to Make over 20% Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells in Regular (n-i-p) and Inverted (p-i-n) Architectures

    Michael Saliba;Juan-Pablo Correa-Baena;Christian M. Wolff;Martin Stolterfoht

  • Nonradiative Recombination in Perovskite Solar Cells: The Role of Interfaces

    Christian Michael Wolff;Pietro Caprioglio;Pietro Caprioglio;Martin Stolterfoht;Dieter Neher

  • Interface engineering for high-performance, triple-halide perovskite–silicon tandem solar cells

    Unknown

  • Perovskite–organic tandem solar cells with indium oxide interconnect

    Unknown

  • Photoluminescence-Based Characterization of Halide Perovskites for Photovoltaics

    Thomas Kirchartz;Thomas Kirchartz;José A. Márquez;Martin Stolterfoht;Thomas Unold

  • On the relation between the open‐circuit voltage and quasi‐Fermi level splitting in efficient perovskite solar cells

    Pietro Caprioglio;Pietro Caprioglio;Martin Stolterfoht;Christian M. Wolff;Thomas Unold

  • Approaching the fill factor Shockley–Queisser limit in stable, dopant-free triple cation perovskite solar cells

    Martin Stolterfoht;Christian M. Wolff;Yohai Amir;Andreas Paulke

  • The perovskite/transport layer interfaces dominate non-radiative recombination in efficient perovskite solar cells

    Martin Stolterfoht;Pietro Caprioglio;Christian M. Wolff;José A. Márquez

  • Nano-optical designs for high-efficiency monolithic perovskite–silicon tandem solar cells

    Unknown

  • Barrierless Free Charge Generation in the High-Performance PM6:Y6 Bulk Heterojunction Non-Fullerene Solar Cell

    Lorena Perdigon-Toro;Huotian Zhang;Anastaa si Markina;Jun Yuan

  • On the Origin of the Ideality Factor in Perovskite Solar Cells

    Pietro Caprioglio;Pietro Caprioglio;Christian M. Wolff;Oskar J. Sandberg;Ardalan Armin

  • Understanding Performance Limiting Interfacial Recombination in pin Perovskite Solar Cells

    Unknown

  • A donor–acceptor-type hole-selective contact reducing non-radiative recombination losses in both subcells towards efficient all-perovskite tandems

    Unknown

  • How to Report Record Open‐Circuit Voltages in Lead‐Halide Perovskite Solar Cells

    Lisa Krückemeier;Uwe Rau;Martin Stolterfoht;Thomas Kirchartz;Thomas Kirchartz

  • Ion-induced field screening as a dominant factor in perovskite solar cell operational stability

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Dieter Neher
Dieter Neher University of Potsdam
Steve Albrecht
Steve Albrecht Technical University of Berlin
Paul L. Burn
Paul L. Burn University of Queensland
Paul Meredith
Paul Meredith Swansea University
Antonio Abate
Antonio Abate Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie
Thomas Unold
Thomas Unold Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie
Norbert Koch
Norbert Koch Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Bernd Rech
Bernd Rech Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie
Thomas Kirchartz
Thomas Kirchartz Forschungszentrum Jülich
Hui Jin
Hui Jin Xi'an Jiaotong University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Martin Stolterfoht