World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark Stoneking

Mark Stoneking

Award Badge
Genetics
Germany
2024
Award Badge
Genetics and Molecular Biology
Germany
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
120
Citations
51315
World Ranking
381
National Ranking
24

Mark Stoneking publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Stoneking sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 408 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Mark Stoneking D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Stoneking sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 120 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in Germany Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Genetics in Germany Leader Award
  • 2020 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2000 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Mark Stoneking is affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany and specializes in research within the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work primarily focuses on genetics, molecular biology, geography, planning and development, archeology, and paleontology.

The main topics covered by their research include:

  • Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies

Stoneking's recent papers illustrate a wide scope of research across population genetics and ancient DNA studies. These include:

  • Ancient DNA indicates human population shifts and admixture in northern and southern China, 2020, Science
  • Genomic insights into population history and biological adaptation in Oceania, 2021, Nature
  • Extensive Ethnolinguistic Diversity in Vietnam Reflects Multiple Sources of Genetic Diversity, 2020, Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • Exploring correlations in genetic and cultural variation across language families in northeast Asia, 2021, Science Advances
  • Ancient DNA from Guam and the Peopling of the Pacific, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent collaborators include Brigitte Pakendorf, Alexander Hübner, Dang Liu, Wibhu Kutanan, and Leonardo Arias. The partnership with these co-authors has resulted in multiple joint publications.

Stoneking's research has been published in various venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • PLoS ONE
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

In recognition of their contributions to science, Stoneking was elected as a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 2020 and became a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2000.

Best Publications

  • Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution

    Rebecca L. Cann;Rebecca L. Cann;Mark Stoneking;Allan C. Wilson

  • Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia

    David Reich;Richard E. Green;Martin Kircher;Johannes Krause

  • Neandertal DNA Sequences and the Origin of Modern Humans

    Matthias Krings;Anne C. Stone;Ralf W. Schmitz;Heike Krainitzki

  • African populations and the evolution of human mitochondrial DNA

    Linda Vigilant;Mark Stoneking;Henry Harpending;Kristen Hawkes

  • Mitochondrial DNA and two perspectives on evolutionary genetics

    Allan C. Wilson;Rebecca L. Cann;Rebecca L. Cann;Steven M. Carr;Steven M. Carr;Matthew George;Matthew George

  • The Genetic Structure of Ancient Human Populations

    Henry C. Harpending;Stephen T. Sherry;Alan R. Rogers;Mark Stoneking

  • Denisova Admixture and the First Modern Human Dispersals into Southeast Asia and Oceania

    David Reich;Nick Patterson;Martin Kircher;Frederick Delfin

  • A genomic history of Aboriginal Australia

    Anna Sapfo Malaspinas;Anna Sapfo Malaspinas;Anna Sapfo Malaspinas;Michael C. Westaway;Craig Muller;Vitor C. Sousa;Vitor C. Sousa

  • Haplotype Diversity and Linkage Disequilibrium at Human G6PD: Recent Origin of Alleles That Confer Malarial Resistance

    Sarah A. Tishkoff;Robert Varkonyi;Nelie Cahinhinan;Salem Abbes

  • Correction: Corrigendum: Larger mitochondrial DNA than Y-chromosome differences between matrilocal and patrilocal groups from Sumatra

    Ellen Dröfn Gunnarsdóttir;Madhusudan R. Nandineni;Mingkun Li;Sean Myles

  • Whole-genome sequence variation, population structure and demographic history of the Dutch population

    Laurent C. Francioli;Androniki Menelaou;Sara L. Pulit;Freerk van Dijk

  • Global diversity in the human salivary microbiome

    Ivan Nasidze;Jing Li;Dominique Quinque;Kun Tang

  • Characteristics and frequency of germline mutations at microsatellite loci from the human Y chromosome, as revealed by direct observation in father/son pairs.

    Manfred Kayser;Lutz Roewer;Minttu Hedman;Lotte Henke

  • Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution.

    Brigitte Pakendorf;Mark Stoneking

  • Length mutations in human mitochondrial DNA: direct sequencing of enzymatically amplified DNA

    Lisa A. Wrischnik;Russell G. Higuchi;Mark Stoneking;Henry A. Erlich

  • A new approach for using genome scans to detect recent positive selection in the human genome.

    Kun Tang;Kevin R Thornton;Mark Stoneking

  • Alu insertion polymorphisms and human evolution: evidence for a larger population size in Africa.

    Mark Stoneking;Jennifer J. Fontius;Stephanie L. Clifford;Himla Soodyall

  • African origin of human-specific polymorphic Alu insertions

    M A Batzer;M Stoneking;M Alegria-Hartman;H Bazan

  • Human mtDNA and Y-chromosome variation is correlated with matrilocal versus patrilocal residence.

    Hiroshi Oota;Wannapa Settheetham-Ishida;Danai Tiwawech;Takafumi Ishida

  • Molecular evolution of Pediculus humanus and the origin of clothing

    Ralf Kittler;Manfred Kayser;Mark Stoneking

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark A. Batzer
Mark A. Batzer Louisiana State University
Sean Myles
Sean Myles Dalhousie University
Stephen T. Sherry
Stephen T. Sherry National Institutes of Health
Manfred Kayser
Manfred Kayser Erasmus University Rotterdam
Allan C. Wilson
Allan C. Wilson University of California, Berkeley
David Reich
David Reich Harvard Medical School
Richard Cordaux
Richard Cordaux University of Poitiers
Prescott L. Deininger
Prescott L. Deininger Tulane University
Kentaro Shimizu
Kentaro Shimizu University of Zurich
Henry A. Erlich
Henry A. Erlich UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA can open doors to various allied health and administrative fields. For those interested in the healthcare industry but seeking flexible options, online programs offer accessible alternatives. If you want to work on the administrative side, medical billing certification provides a streamlined route to an in-demand healthcare role.

For students interested in direct patient care, choosing a nursing school with high acceptance rate can help you begin your journey quickly and gain essential clinical skills. Many also consider academic routes in leadership, such as online health administration programs to advance their careers and impact healthcare systems from a managerial level.

Cost is a crucial factor when choosing a degree. Programs like the cheapest mha programs online can provide a master’s in healthcare administration without a high financial burden. Taking advantage of these specialized programs allows Genetics graduates to diversify their career possibilities and thrive in the growing health sector.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Stoneking

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles