World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 41 7782 7182 64 62 234 8524

Eduardo R. Zimmer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eduardo R. Zimmer between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eduardo R. Zimmer published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 24.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 103 publications in 2023. 115 of the 445 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 103. Peak 103 publications in 2023. 2008: 2 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 38 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 43 publications 2023: 103 publications 2024: 78 publications 2025: 37 publications
2008 2025

445 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eduardo R. Zimmer: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 2
2009 6
2010 3
2011 1
2012 4
2013 9
2014 38
2015 8
2016 18
2017 13
2018 9
2019 16
2020 19
2021 38
2022 43
2023 103
2024 78
2025 37
Total 445
Download as CSV

Eduardo R. Zimmer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eduardo R. Zimmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 228–237 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 234 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220 234
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Eduardo R. Zimmer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eduardo R. Zimmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 41
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Eduardo R. Zimmer is affiliated with the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with notable contributions to subfields such as Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neurology, Molecular Biology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist has published extensively on topics related to Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, dementia and cognitive impairment research, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, functional brain connectivity studies, neurological disease mechanisms and treatments, and tryptophan and brain disorders.

Frequent publication venues for Eduardo R. Zimmer include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Neurology
  • Research Square (Research Square)

The scientist collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Tharick A. Pascoal
  • Pedro Rosa-Neto
  • Bruna Bellaver
  • Pâmela C.L. Ferreira
  • João Pedro Ferrari-Souza

Representative recent papers demonstrate Eduardo R. Zimmer's active involvement in current research themes and include:

  • "Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions," 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Differences Between Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Levels Across the Alzheimer Disease Continuum," 2021, JAMA Neurology
  • "Astrocyte reactivity influences amyloid-β effects on tau pathology in preclinical Alzheimer's disease," 2023, Nature Medicine
  • "Association of Phosphorylated Tau Biomarkers With Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography vs Tau Positron Emission Tomography," 2022, JAMA Neurology
  • "A two-step workflow based on plasma p-tau217 to screen for amyloid β positivity with further confirmatory testing only in uncertain cases," 2023, Nature Aging

Best Publications

  • Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions

    Carole Escartin;Elena Galea;András Lakatos;James P. O’Callaghan

  • Differences Between Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Levels Across the Alzheimer Disease Continuum.

    Andréa L Benedet;Andréa L Benedet;Marta Milà-Alomà;Agathe Vrillon;Agathe Vrillon;Nicholas J Ashton

  • [18F]FDG PET signal is driven by astroglial glutamate transport

    Eduardo R Zimmer;Maxime J Parent;Débora G Souza;Antoine Leuzy;Antoine Leuzy

  • Astrocyte reactivity influences amyloid-β effects on tau pathology in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Astrocyte Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease.

    Stephen F. Carter;Karl Herholz;Pedro Rosa-Neto;Pedro Rosa-Neto;Luc Pellerin;Luc Pellerin

  • Association of Phosphorylated Tau Biomarkers With Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography vs Tau Positron Emission Tomography

    Unknown

  • Cerebrospinal fluid p-tau231 as an early indicator of emerging pathology in Alzheimer's disease

    Unknown

  • Cholinergic Differentiation of Human Neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y Cell Line and Its Potential Use as an In vitro Model for Alzheimer's Disease Studies.

    Liana M de Medeiros;Liana M de Medeiros;Marco A De Bastiani;Marco A De Bastiani;Eduardo P Rico;Patrícia Schonhofen;Patrícia Schonhofen

  • Astrocyte biomarker signatures of amyloid-β and tau pathologies in Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Tracking neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease: the role of positron emission tomography imaging.

    Eduardo Rigon Zimmer;Eduardo Rigon Zimmer;Antoine Leuzy;Andréa Lessa Benedet;Andréa Lessa Benedet;John Breitner

  • Staging of Alzheimer's disease: past, present, and future perspectives.

    Unknown

  • Astrocyte Biomarkers in Alzheimer Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Bruna Bellaver;João Pedro Ferrari-Souza;Lucas Uglione da Ros;Stephen F. Carter;Stephen F. Carter

  • Exercise increases insulin signaling in the hippocampus: physiological effects and pharmacological impact of intracerebroventricular insulin administration in mice.

    Alexandre P. Muller;Jussânia Gnoatto;Julia D. Moreira;Eduardo R. Zimmer

  • Stage-specific links between plasma neurofilament light and imaging biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease.

    Andréa L Benedet;Andréa L Benedet;Antoine Leuzy;Tharick A Pascoal;Nicholas J Ashton

  • Reduced brain insulin-like growth factor I function during aging.

    Alexandre Pastoris Muller;Ana M. Fernandez;Clarissa Haas;Eduardo Zimmer

  • Amyloid-β oligomers in cellular models of Alzheimer's disease.

    Igor C. Fontana;Aline R. Zimmer;Andreia S. Rocha;Grace Gosmann

  • Alzheimer’s disease master regulators analysis: search for potential molecular targets and drug repositioning candidates

    D. M. Vargas;M. A. De Bastiani;E. R. Zimmer;E. R. Zimmer;F. Klamt;F. Klamt

  • APOEε4 associates with microglial activation independently of Aβ plaques and tau tangles

    Unknown

  • The GABAergic system in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

    Unknown

  • Consequences of Metabolic Disruption in Alzheimer's Disease Pathology.

    J. C. Ryu;E. R. Zimmer;P. Rosa-Neto;S. O. Yoon

  • Guanosine Anxiolytic-Like Effect Involves Adenosinergic and Glutamatergic Neurotransmitter Systems

    Roberto Farina Almeida;Daniel Diniz Comasseto;Denise Barbosa Ramos;Gisele Hansel

  • Plasma neurofilament light associates with Alzheimer's disease metabolic decline in amyloid-positive individuals

    Andréa L. Benedet;Andréa L. Benedet;Nicholas J. Ashton;Tharick A. Pascoal;Antoine Leuzy

  • The astrocyte biochemistry.

    Débora G. Souza;Roberto F. Almeida;Roberto F. Almeida;Diogo O. Souza;Eduardo R. Zimmer

  • Synaptic vesicle protein 2A as a potential biomarker in synaptopathies.

    Kerstin Heurling;Nicholas J. Ashton;Antoine Leuzy;Eduardo R. Zimmer

  • Developments in Tau PET Imaging.

    Eduardo Rigon Zimmer;Antoine Leuzy;Serge Gauthier;Pedro Rosa-Neto

  • Elevated glutamate and lactate predict brain death after severe head trauma.

    Marco A. Stefani;Rafael Modkovski;Gisele Hansel;Eduardo R. Zimmer;Eduardo R. Zimmer

  • Guanosine prevents anhedonic-like behavior and impairment in hippocampal glutamate transport following amyloid-β1–40 administration in mice.

    Débora Lanznaster;Josiel M Mack;Victor Coelho;Marcelo Ganzella;Marcelo Ganzella

Frequent Co-Authors

Pedro Rosa-Neto
Pedro Rosa-Neto McGill University
Serge Gauthier
Serge Gauthier McGill University
Diogo O. Souza
Diogo O. Souza Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Jean-Paul Soucy
Jean-Paul Soucy Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Luc Pellerin
Luc Pellerin University of Poitiers
A. Claudio Cuello
A. Claudio Cuello McGill University
Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg
Christianne Gazzana Salbego
Christianne Gazzana Salbego Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Nicholas J. Ashton
Nicholas J. Ashton University of Gothenburg
Agneta Nordberg
Agneta Nordberg Karolinska University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Neuroscience in the USA opens the door to diverse online degree and career pathways, especially in related fields such as psychology, social work, and applied behavior analysis. If you're interested in directly supporting individuals and communities, online msw programs provide a flexible route to qualify for licensed social work roles. For those looking to specialize in behavioral interventions, bcba online masters programs offer a focused curriculum in applied behavior analysis, which shares foundational neuroscience concepts.

Time and affordability are also key considerations for many students. You may want to explore accelerated masters in social work options, which enable faster entry into the workforce. If your interests lean toward mental health or human cognition but you seek a shorter commitment, earning a 2-year psychology degree online can serve as a stepping stone into graduate studies or entry-level psychology careers.

Evaluating these pathways ensures you find an academic and career fit aligned with your goals, whether in research, clinical practice, or applied behavioral roles.

Best Scientists Citing Eduardo R. Zimmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles