World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
33
Citations
6766
World Ranking
2963
National Ranking
1007

Mario A. Rotea publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario A. Rotea sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 190 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Mario A. Rotea D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario A. Rotea sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to robust and optimal control of multivariable systems

Best Publications

  • Mixed H/sub 2//H/sub infinity / control: a convex optimization approach

    P.P. Khargonekar;M.A. Rotea

  • Passive structural control of offshore wind turbines

    Matthew A. Lackner;Mario A. Rotea

  • H/sub infinity /-optimal control with state-feedback

    P.P. Khargonekar;I.R. Petersen;M.A. Rotea

  • The generalized H 2 control problem

    Unknown

  • Structural control of floating wind turbines

    Matthew A. Lackner;Mario A. Rotea

  • H 2 -optimal control with an H ∞ -constraint: the state feedback case

    Mario A. Rotea;Pramod P. Khargonekar

  • Analysis of multivariable extremum seeking algorithms

    Unknown

  • Mixed H2/H∞ filtering

    Pramod P. Khargonekar;Mario A. Rotea;Enrique Baeyens

  • Mixed H 2 / H ∞ control for discrete-time systems via convex optimization

    Isaac Kaminer;Pramod P. Khargonekar;Mario A. Rotea

  • Wind energy research: State-of-the-art and future research directions

    D.J. Willis;C. Niezrecki;D. Kuchma;E. Hines

  • New Algorithms for Aircraft Intent Inference and Trajectory Prediction

    Javier Lovera Yepes;Inseok Hwang;Mario Rotea

  • Multiple objective optimal control of linear systems: the quadratic norm case

    P.P. Khargonekar;M.A. Rotea

  • Optimal guaranteed cost control of discrete‐time uncertain linear systems

    Ian R. Petersen;Duncan C. McFarlane;Mario A. Rotea

  • Brief New results for analysis of systems with repeated nonlinearities

    F. J. D'Amato;M. A. Rotea;A. V. Megretski;U. T. JöNsson

  • Extremum seeking control of a tunable thermoacoustic cooler

    Yaoyu Li;M.A. Rotea;G.T.-C. Chiu;L.G. Mongeau

  • Data-driven Reduced Order Model for prediction of wind turbine wakes

    Giacomo V. Iungo;C. Santoni-Ortiz;M. Abkar;F. Porté-Agel

  • Stabilization of uncertain systems with norm bounded uncertainty-a control

    Unknown

  • A Convergent Algorithm for the Output Covariance Constraint Control Problem

    G. Zhu;M. A. Rotea;R. Skelton

  • Systems with structured uncertainty: relations between quadratic and robust stability

    M.A. Rotea;M. Corless;D. Da;I.R. Petersen

  • An ℒ2 disturbance attenuation solution to the nonlinear benchmark problem

    Panagiotis Tsiotras;Martin Corless;Mario A. Rotea

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefano Leonardi
Stefano Leonardi Sapienza University of Rome
Pramod P. Khargonekar
Pramod P. Khargonekar University of California, Irvine
Yaoyu Li
Yaoyu Li The University of Texas at Dallas
Martin Corless
Martin Corless Purdue University West Lafayette
Panagiotis Tsiotras
Panagiotis Tsiotras Georgia Institute of Technology
Tetsuya Iwasaki
Tetsuya Iwasaki University of California, Los Angeles
Ian R. Petersen
Ian R. Petersen Australian National University
Matthew A. Lackner
Matthew A. Lackner University of Massachusetts Amherst
Duncan McFarlane
Duncan McFarlane University of Cambridge
Carlo L. Bottasso
Carlo L. Bottasso Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering often explore complementary fields to broaden their expertise and career options. One such area with growing demand is speech-language pathology, which offers various online degree programs tailored for different needs.

Understanding the slp grad school acceptance rate can help prospective students gauge their chances of admission into competitive programs. For those looking for flexibility, the easiest slp masters to get into provides insights on programs with more accessible entry requirements.

Cost is a major consideration when selecting an online degree. Prospective learners should review detailed information on speech pathology degree cost online to make informed financial decisions.

Additionally, many programs offer specialized support for veterans. Exploring options like speech pathology degree online for veterans can connect veterans with tailored resources and benefits.

By considering these pathways, students can strategically enhance their qualifications, opening doors to versatile career opportunities beyond traditional engineering roles.

Best Scientists Citing Mario A. Rotea

Recently Published Articles