World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
5670
World Ranking
9817
National Ranking
217

Marco Lauriola publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Lauriola sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 130 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marco Lauriola D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Lauriola sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marco Lauriola is affiliated with Sapienza University of Rome in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a significant body of work spanning clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, sociology, political science, and cognitive neuroscience.

The main research topics addressed by Lauriola include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Risk Perception and Management

Key recent publications authored or co-authored by Lauriola include:

  • Risk Perception and Protective Behaviors During the Rise of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Italy, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Gender-related time course of sleep disturbances and psychological symptoms during the COVID-19 lockdown: A longitudinal study on the Italian population, 2020, Neurobiology of Stress
  • Risk perceptions and COVID-19 protective behaviors: A two-wave longitudinal study of epidemic and post-epidemic periods, 2022, Social Science & Medicine
  • Demographic, psychological, chronobiological, and work-related predictors of sleep disturbances during the COVID-19 lockdown in Italy, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • The Vicious Cycle: Problematic Family Relations, Substance Abuse, and Crime in Adolescence: A Narrative Review, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology

Lauriola has published extensively in several academic journals. The most frequent venues for their work include:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Children
  • Psychological Reports
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology

Frequent collaborators in Lauriola's research include:

  • Oriana Mosca
  • C. Minaglia
  • Gioia Bottesi
  • Stefano Pontone
  • Manuela Tomai

The scope of Lauriola's research reflects a multidisciplinary approach, integrating clinical and experimental psychology with social psychological aspects and neuroscience. Emphasis on child and adolescent development and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic is prominent in their work. Sleep disturbances, psychological well-being, and risk perception during epidemic contexts have been particular areas of investigation.

Best Publications

  • A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects

    Irwin P. Levin;Gary J. Gaeth;Judy Schreiber;Marco Lauriola

  • Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: An exploratory study.

    Marco Lauriola;Irwin P Levin

  • Individual Differences in Risky Decision Making: A Meta‐analysis of Sensation Seeking and Impulsivity with the Balloon Analogue Risk Task

    Marco Lauriola;Angelo Panno;Irwin P. Levin;Carl W. Lejuez

  • On the dimensionality of the System Usability Scale: a test of alternative measurement models

    Simone Borsci;Stefano Federici;Marco Lauriola

  • Relating individual differences in attitude toward ambiguity to risky choices

    Marco Lauriola;Irwin P. Levin

  • Risk Perception and Protective Behaviors During the Rise of the COVID-19 Outbreak in Italy

    Lucia Savadori;Marco Lauriola

  • A confirmatory bifactor analysis of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in an Italian community sample

    Luca Iani;Marco Lauriola;Massimo Costantini

  • Emotion regulation and risk taking: Predicting risky choice in deliberative decision making

    Angelo Panno;Marco Lauriola;Bernd Figner

  • Epistemic curiosity and self-regulation

    Marco Lauriola;Jordan A. Litman;Patrick Mussel;Riccardo De Santis

  • Common and distinct factors in decision making under ambiguity and risk: A psychometric study of individual differences

    Marco Lauriola;Irwin P. Levin;Stephanie S. Hart

  • The role of personality in positively and negatively framed risky health decisions

    Marco Lauriola;Paolo M. Russo;Fabio Lucidi;Cristiano Violani

  • Gender-related time course of sleep disturbances and psychological symptoms during the COVID-19 lockdown: A longitudinal study on the Italian population.

    Federico Salfi;Marco Lauriola;Giulia Amicucci;Domenico Corigliano

  • World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II: Contribution to the Italian validation

    Stefano Federici;Fabio Meloni;Alessandra Mancini;Marco Lauriola

  • Meta-analysis of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale – Expanded (BPRS-E) structure and arguments for a new version

    Federico Dazzi;Alan Shafer;Marco Lauriola

  • Associations Between Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation: the Key Role of Describing and Nonreactivity

    Luca Iani;Marco Lauriola;Alberto Chiesa;Valentina Cafaro

  • Attitude Toward Ambiguity: Empirically Robust Factors in Self-Report Personality Scales.

    Marco Lauriola;Renato Foschi;Oriana Mosca;Joshua Weller

  • A neuropsychological approach to understanding risk-taking for potential gains and losses.

    Irwin P. Levin;Gui Xue;Joshua A. Weller;Martin Reimann

  • Risk perceptions and COVID-19 protective behaviors: A two-wave longitudinal study of epidemic and post-epidemic periods

    Unknown

  • Happiness in Italy: Translation, Factorial Structure and Norming of the Subjective Happiness Scale in a Large Community Sample

    Luca Iani;Marco Lauriola;Kristin Layous;Saulo Sirigatti

  • Work values and college major choice

    Michela Balsamo;Marco Lauriola;Aristide Saggino

  • Sleep-related car crashes: risk perception and decision-making processes in young drivers.

    Fabio Lucidi;Paolo Maria Russo;Luca Mallia;Alessandra Devoto

Frequent Co-Authors

Irwin P. Levin
Irwin P. Levin University of Iowa
Fabio Lucidi
Fabio Lucidi Sapienza University of Rome
Renata Tambelli
Renata Tambelli Sapienza University of Rome
Michele Ferrara
Michele Ferrara University of L'Aquila
R. Nicholas Carleton
R. Nicholas Carleton University of Regina
Antonio Pierro
Antonio Pierro Sapienza University of Rome
Cristiano Violani
Cristiano Violani Sapienza University of Rome
Antoine Bechara
Antoine Bechara University of Southern California
Arnaldo Zelli
Arnaldo Zelli University of Rome "Foro Italico"
Luigi De Gennaro
Luigi De Gennaro Sapienza University of Rome

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and counseling can open doors to diverse and rewarding career paths. Many students choose to study psychology online for the flexibility to balance work, life, and education. Online programs often mirror campus-based curricula, emphasizing counseling skills, mental health theories, and ethical practice.

It’s important to research accredited programs that align with your career ambitions. For instance, if you’re interested in opportunities on the West Coast, reviewing the best counseling program rankings in Stockton or the Washington counseling degree programs can help you identify top-rated schools and specializations.

If you’re considering the Southwest, have a look at the best counseling degree programs in Tucson. For those interested in studying in the South, explore various Texas counseling degree programs.

Whether you dream of becoming a licensed counselor, therapist, school psychologist, or another specialist, the right online degree can set you on the path toward your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Lauriola

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles