World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
32
Citations
4270
World Ranking
3155
National Ranking
96

M. Uthayakumar publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Uthayakumar sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 153 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

M. Uthayakumar D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Uthayakumar sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Fatigue behaviour of FDM-3D printed polymers, polymeric composites and architected cellular materials

    Vigneshwaran Shanmugam;Oisik Das;Karthik Babu;Uthayakumar Marimuthu

  • Recent advancement in the natural fiber polymer composites: A comprehensive review

    Unknown

  • The mechanical testing and performance analysis of polymer-fibre composites prepared through the additive manufacturing

    Vigneshwaran Shanmugam;Deepak Joel Johnson Rajendran;Karthik Babu;Sundarakannan Rajendran

  • Wear performance of Al–SiC–B4C hybrid composites under dry sliding conditions

    Unknown

  • Machinability of Nickel-Based Superalloy by Abrasive Water Jet Machining

    Unknown

  • Development and sustainability of industrial waste-based red mud hybrid composites

    Unknown

  • Thermal Properties of Natural Fiber Sisal Based Hybrid Composites – A Brief Review

    Unknown

  • Parametric optimization of wire electrical discharge machining on aluminium based composites through grey relational analysis

    Unknown

  • Prediction of surface roughness in abrasive water jet machining of CFRP composites using regression analysis

    Unknown

  • Effect of Moisture Absorption Behavior on Mechanical Properties of Basalt Fibre Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites

    Unknown

  • Rotary ultrasonic machining of woven CFRP composite in a cryogenic environment

    Unknown

  • Potential use of industrial waste-red mud in developing hybrid composites: A waste management approach

    Unknown

  • Electrical Discharge Machining of Al(6351)–SiC–B<sub>4</sub>C Hybrid Composite

    Unknown

  • Dry Sliding Friction and Wear Studies of Fly Ash Reinforced AA-6351 Metal Matrix Composites

    Unknown

  • A review on the performance of the materials by surface modification through EDM

    S. Suresh Kumar;S. Suresh Kumar;Temel Varol;Aykut Canakci;S. Thirumalai Kumaran

  • Investigation on the dry sliding friction and wear behavior of AA6351-SiC-B<sub>4</sub>C hybrid metal matrix composites

    Unknown

  • Investigating the surface integrity of aluminium based composites machined by EDM

    S. Suresh Kumar;M. Uthayakumar;S. Thirumalai Kumaran;Temel Varol

  • Review on Machinability of Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Drilling Approach

    Unknown

  • Mechanical and machining performance of glass and coconut sheath fibre polyester composites using AWJM

    Unknown

  • Influence of filler on erosion behavior of polymer composites: A comprehensive review

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering often opens doors to diverse career paths. For students interested in accelerated study options, programs such as the 5-year accelerated speech pathology programs illustrate how focused, intensive study can fast-track professional readiness in specialized fields.

Those curious about high-stakes, analytical careers might consider roles like forensic profiling, where understanding the forensic profiler salary and job outlook helps gauge industry demand and rewards.

Additionally, engineering students interested in integrating counseling or human factors into their work may explore various therapy options. Learning about different therapy degrees can help identify suitable programs that blend technical expertise with interpersonal skills.

For those seeking accessible entry points into counseling-related fields, researching the easiest counseling degrees provides insight into streamlined pathways that complement engineering backgrounds.

Recently Published Articles