World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
72
Citations
20736
World Ranking
6232
National Ranking
2931

Lutgarde Raskin publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lutgarde Raskin sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 227 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Lutgarde Raskin D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lutgarde Raskin sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lutgarde Raskin is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research work primarily centers on environmental science with a focus on anaerobic digestion, wastewater treatment, and microbial community ecology.

They have contributed to a range of topics including:

  • Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
  • Biofuel Production and Bioconversion
  • Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Mycobacterium Research and Diagnosis
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology

The subfields they work in include Building and Construction, Ecology, Molecular Biology, Pollution, and Infectious Diseases.

Raskin has published extensively, with frequent contributions to journals such as:

  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Water Research
  • Environmental Science Water Research & Technology
  • ACS ES&T Engineering

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Anaerobic co-digestion: Current status and perspectives" (2021), published in Bioresource Technology
  • "Synergistic association between cytochrome bd-encoded Proteiniphilum and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging methanogens in microaerobic-anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass" (2020), published in Water Research
  • "Anaerobic co-digestion of various organic wastes: Kinetic modeling and synergistic impact evaluation" (2021), published in Bioresource Technology
  • "UV Disinfection of Human Norovirus: Evaluating Infectivity Using a Genome-Wide PCR-Based Approach" (2020), published in Environmental Science & Technology
  • "Integrating Environmental Dimensions of "One Health" to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance: Essential Research Needs" (2022), published in Environmental Science & Technology

They have coauthored numerous works with frequent collaborators including Krista R. Wigginton, Shilva Shrestha, Steven J. Skerlos, Nicole C. Rockey, and Katherine Dowdell.

Raskin has also contributed to book publications with the Water Environment Federation, including titles such as:

  • "Long-Term Performance of a Recirculating Anaerobic Dynamic Membrane Bioreactor for Mainstream Domestic Wastewater Treatment" (2020)
  • "Source Separated Organic Food Waste Characteristics and Implication for Co-digestion Performance, Operation, and Design" (2021)

Best Publications

  • Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes to describe natural communities of methanogens

    L Raskin;J M Stromley;B E Rittmann;D A Stahl

  • The oligonucleotide probe database.

    Elizabeth Wheeler Alm;Daniel B. Oerther;N. Larsen;David A. Stahl

  • A new planning and design paradigm to achieve sustainable resource recovery from wastewater

    Jeremy S. Guest;Steven J. Skerlos;James L. Barnard;M. Bruce Beck

  • Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions--I. Digester performance.

    Peter G. Stroot;Katherine D. McMahon;Roderick I. Mackie;Lutgarde Raskin

  • Common principles and best practices for engineering microbiomes

    Christopher E. Lawson;William R. Harcombe;Roland Hatzenpichler;Stephen R. Lindemann

  • Microbial ecology of drinking water distribution systems.

    David Berry;Chuanwu Xi;Lutgarde Raskin

  • Diversity and dynamics of microbial communities in engineered environments and their implications for process stability.

    Aurelio Briones;Lutgarde Raskin

  • Methanogenic population dynamics during start-up of anaerobic digesters treating municipal solid waste and biosolids.

    Matt E. Griffin;Katherine D. McMahon;Roderick I. Mackie;Lutgarde Raskin

  • PCR biases distort bacterial and archaeal community structure in pyrosequencing datasets.

    Ameet J. Pinto;Lutgarde Raskin

  • Quantification of methanogenic groups in anaerobic biological reactors by oligonucleotide probe hybridization.

    L Raskin;L K Poulsen;D R Noguera;B E Rittmann

  • Bacterial community structure in the drinking water microbiome is governed by filtration processes

    Ameet J. Pinto;Chuanwu Xi;Lutgarde Raskin

  • Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions-II : microbial population dynamics

    Katherine D. McMahon;Peter G. Stroot;Roderick I. Mackie;Lutgarde Raskin

  • Anaerobic co-digestion: Current status and perspectives.

    Renisha Karki;Wachiranon Chuenchart;K.C. Surendra;Shilva Shrestha

  • Characterization of universal small-subunit rRNA hybridization probes for quantitative molecular microbial ecology studies

    D Zheng;E W Alm;D A Stahl;L Raskin

  • Perspectives on anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater: a critical review.

    Adam L. Smith;Lauren B. Stadler;Nancy G. Love;Steven J. Skerlos

  • Flexible community structure correlates with stable community function in methanogenic bioreactor communities perturbed by glucose

    Ana S. Fernandez;Syed A. Hashsham;Sherry L. Dollhopf;Lutgarde Raskin

  • Methanogenic population dynamics during startup of a full-scale anaerobic sequencing batch reactor treating swine waste

    Largus T Angenent;Shihwu Sung;Lutgarde Raskin

  • Psychrophilic anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater.

    Adam L. Smith;Steven J. Skerlos;Lutgarde Raskin

  • Competition and coexistence of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic populations in anaerobic biofilms.

    Lutgarde Raskin;Bruce E. Rittmann;David A. Stahl;David A. Stahl

  • Navigating Wastewater Energy Recovery Strategies: A Life Cycle Comparison of Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor and Conventional Treatment Systems with Anaerobic Digestion

    Adam L. Smith;Lauren B. Stadler;Ling Cao;Nancy G. Love

Frequent Co-Authors

Eberhard Morgenroth
Eberhard Morgenroth Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
Nancy G. Love
Nancy G. Love University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kim F. Hayes
Kim F. Hayes University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David A. Stahl
David A. Stahl University of Washington
Largus T. Angenent
Largus T. Angenent University of Tübingen
Shihwu Sung
Shihwu Sung University of Hawaii at Hilo
Stephen A. Boppart
Stephen A. Boppart University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Katherine D. McMahon
Katherine D. McMahon University of Wisconsin–Madison
John J. LiPuma
John J. LiPuma University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Roderick I. Mackie
Roderick I. Mackie University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Lutgarde Raskin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles