World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Luis M. Cruz-Orive

Luis M. Cruz-Orive

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
34
Citations
7302
World Ranking
2858
National Ranking
62

Luis M. Cruz-Orive publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luis M. Cruz-Orive sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 110 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Luis M. Cruz-Orive D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luis M. Cruz-Orive sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Estimation of surface area from vertical sections.

    A. J. Baddeley;H. J. G. Gundersen;L. M. Cruz-Orive

  • Recent stereological methods for cell biology: a brief survey

    L. M. Cruz-Orive;E. R. Weibel

  • Application of the Cavalieri principle and vertical sections method to lung: estimation of volume and pleural surface area

    René P. Michel;Luis M. Cruz-Orive;Luis M. Cruz-Orive

  • Particle number can be estimated using a disector of unknown thickness: the selector.

    Cruz-Orive Lm

  • Measuring error and sampling variation in stereology: comparison of the efficiency of various methods for planar image analysis.

    Odile Mathieu;L. M. Cruz-Orive;H. Hoppeler;E. R. Weibel

  • Distribution‐free estimation of sphere size distributions from slabs showing overprojection and truncation, with a review of previous methods

    L. M. Cruz-Orive

  • Stereology for anisotropic cells: Application to growth cartilage*

    Luis‐M. Cruz‐Orive;Ernst B. Hunziker

  • UNBIASED ESTIMATION OF HUMAN-BODY COMPOSITION BY THE CAVALIERI METHOD USING MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING

    N. Roberts;L. M. Cruz-Orive;N. M. K. Reid;D. A. Brodie

  • Estimating length density and quantifying anisotropy in skeletal muscle capillaries.

    Odile Mathieu;Luis-M. Cruz-Orive;Hans Hoppeler;Ewald R. Weibel

  • Precision of Cavalieri sections and slices with local errors

    L. M. Cruz-Orive

  • Comparison of MR imaging against physical sectioning to estimate the volume of human cerebral compartments.

    Marta García-Fiñana;Luis M. Cruz-Orive;Clare E. Mackay;Bente Pakkenberg

  • Estimation of fetal volume by magnetic resonance imaging and stereology

    N Roberts;A S Garden;L M Cruz-Orive;G H Whitehouse

  • Stereology of single objects

    L. M. Cruz-Orive

  • Particle size‐shape distributions: the general spheroid problem: II. Stochastic model and practical guide

    Unknown

  • On the precision of systematic sampling: a review of Matheron's transitive methods

    Luis M. Cruz-Orive

  • Characterizing anisotropy: A new concept☆

    Luis M. Cruz-Orive;Lars M. Karlsson;Søren E. Larsen;Felix Wainschtein

  • Estimating the length of a bounded curve in three dimensions using total vertical projections

    Luis M. Cruz‐Orive;C. Vyvyan Howard

  • Comparison of two subsampling methods for electron microscopic morphometry

    A. E. Müller;L. M. Cruz‐Orive;P. Gehr;E. R. Weibel

  • Increase in hepatocyte and nuclear volume and decrease in the population of binucleated cells in preneoplastic foci of rat liver: a stereological study using the nucleator method.

    Elspeth M. Jack;Philip Bentley;Francoise Bieri;Samar F. Muakkassah-Kelly

  • Stereological Analysis of Anisotropic Structures using Directional Statistics

    L. M. Cruz-Orive;H. Hoppeler;O. Mathieu;E. R. Weibel

Frequent Co-Authors

Ewald R. Weibel
Ewald R. Weibel University of Bern
Neil Roberts
Neil Roberts University of Edinburgh
Ricardo Insausti
Ricardo Insausti University of Castilla-La Mancha
Ernst B. Hunziker
Ernst B. Hunziker University of Bern
Hans Hoppeler
Hans Hoppeler University of Bern
Adrian Baddeley
Adrian Baddeley Curtin University
Michel Hamon
Michel Hamon Université Paris Cité
Bente Pakkenberg
Bente Pakkenberg University of Copenhagen
Clare E. Mackay
Clare E. Mackay University of Oxford
Mara Dierssen
Mara Dierssen Centre for Genomic Regulation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Mathematics degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways, many of which can be enhanced through related online degrees. For professionals aiming to elevate their business acumen alongside their quantitative skills, exploring a one year MBA program offers a fast-track option to gain leadership and management expertise.

Flexibility is key for many students, especially those looking to build on prior education. Programs that accept online MBA transfer credits provide a practical route to complete a degree efficiently without repeating coursework.

For math graduates interested in the growing field of big data, a data analytics masters offers specialized training in interpreting complex data sets, making graduates highly desirable in tech and finance sectors.

Additionally, those seeking accessible options might consider programs listed among the easiest MBA program to get into, which balance entry requirements with quality curriculum, allowing for seamless advancement in business-related careers.

Best Scientists Citing Luis M. Cruz-Orive

Recently Published Articles