World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 41 471 424 14 13 215 5695

Lucia Quaglia publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lucia Quaglia between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lucia Quaglia published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2020. 11 of the 271 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2020. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 9 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 36 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 8 publications
2002 2025

271 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lucia Quaglia: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 9
2004 6
2005 5
2006 3
2007 15
2008 8
2009 17
2010 10
2011 7
2012 7
2013 10
2014 16
2015 12
2016 19
2017 19
2018 11
2019 10
2020 36
2021 10
2022 17
2023 12
2024 3
2025 8
Total 271
Download as CSV

Lucia Quaglia publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucia Quaglia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–215 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 215 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19 215
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Lucia Quaglia D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucia Quaglia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32 41
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Lucia Quaglia is a researcher affiliated with the University of Bologna in Italy. Their academic work focuses primarily on topics related to economics, finance, and political science, with a strong emphasis on global financial regulation and crises, European Union policy and governance, and banking stability.

Their research contributions span several fields of study including Economics, Econometrics and Finance; Business, Management and Accounting; and Social Sciences. Within these broad disciplines, Quaglia's work delves into specific subfields such as Finance, Strategy and Management, and Political Science and International Relations.

Key thematic areas in their research include global financial regulation and crises, state capitalism and financial governance, European Union policy and governance, banking stability, regulation and efficiency, social policy and reform studies, regulation and compliance studies, and international arbitration and investment law.

Lucia Quaglia has published extensively in peer-reviewed journals. Frequent venues for their work include:

  • Journal of European Public Policy
  • JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
  • Regulation & Governance
  • Journal of European Integration
  • International Political Science Review

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Quaglia showcase engagement with current economic and political challenges, including the European Central Bank's response to the COVID-19 crisis and the broader implications for the European Union. Notable publications include:

  • "Explaining the response of the ECB to the COVID-19 related economic crisis: inter-crisis and intra-crisis learning" (2022) in Journal of European Public Policy
  • "The COVID-19 pandemic and the European Union: politics, policies and institutions" (2023) in Journal of European Public Policy
  • "Regime complexity and managing financial data streams: The orchestration of trade reporting for derivatives" (2021) in Regulation & Governance

Frequent collaborators in their research include Scott James, Amy Verdun, Aneta Spendzharova, David Howarth, and Enrico Borghetto. This network of co-authors reflects a cross-disciplinary and international approach to questions of governance, policy, and regulation.

Best Publications

  • Euroscepticism and the Global Financial Crisis

    Fabio Serricchio;Myrto Tsakatika;Lucia Quaglia;Lucia Quaglia

  • The Political Economy of European Banking Union

    David Howarth;Lucia Quaglia

  • Banking Union as Holy Grail: Rebuilding the Single Market in Financial Services, Stabilizing Europe's Banks and ‘Completing’ Economic and Monetary Union

    David Howarth;Lucia Quaglia

  • Banking on Stability: The Political Economy of New Capital Requirements in the European Union

    David Howarth;Lucia Quaglia

  • The Steep Road to European Banking Union: Constructing the Single Resolution Mechanism

    David Howarth;Lucia Quaglia

  • European Perspectives on the Global Financial Crisis: Introduction*

    Dermot Hodson;Lucia Quaglia

  • The ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Politics of Financial Services Regulation in the European Union

    Lucia Quaglia;Lucia Quaglia

  • Governing financial services in the European Union: banking, securities and post-trading

    Lucia Quaglia

  • Completing the Single Market in Financial services: The politics of competing advocacy coalitions

    Lucia Quaglia;Lucia Quaglia

  • What Makes a Good EU Presidency? Italy and Ireland Compared*

    Lucia Quaglia;Edward Moxon-Browne

  • The politics of financial services regulation and supervision reform in the European Union

    Lucia Quaglia

  • The European Union and Global Financial Regulation

    Lucia Quaglia

  • Explaining the response of the ECB to the COVID-19 related economic crisis: inter-crisis and intra-crisis learning

    Unknown

  • The Comparative Politics of Communist Euroscepticism in France, Italy and Spain:

    Giacomo Benedetto;Lucia Quaglia

  • The Political Economy of European Capital Markets Union

    Lucia Quaglia;David Howarth;Moritz Liebe

  • COMMITTEE GOVERNANCE AND SOCIALIZATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

    Lucia Quaglia;Fabrizio De Francesco;Claudio M. Radaelli

  • The Financial Turmoil and EU Policy Co-operation in 2008*

    Lucia Quaglia;Robert Eastwood;Peter Holmes

  • Italian politics and the European Union: A tale of two research designs

    Lucia Quaglia;Claudio M. Radaelli

  • Central Banking Governance in the European Union: A Comparative Analysis

    Lucia Quaglia

  • The politics and economics of Brexit

    Simon Bulmer;Lucia Quaglia

  • Banks and the political economy of the sovereign debt crisis in Italy and Spain

    Lucia Quaglia;Sebastián Royo

  • The "Old" and "New" Political Economy of Hedge Fund Regulation in the European Union

    Lucia Quaglia;Lucia Quaglia

  • Failing forward in Economic and Monetary Union: explaining weak Eurozone financial support mechanisms

    David Howarth;Lucia Quaglia

  • Post‐crisis reforms in banking: Regulators at the interface between domestic and international governance

    Lucia Quaglia;Aneta Spendzharova

Frequent Co-Authors

David Howarth
David Howarth University of Essex
Kenneth Dyson
Kenneth Dyson Cardiff University
Claudio M. Radaelli
Claudio M. Radaelli European University Institute
Dermot Hodson
Dermot Hodson Loughborough University
Simon Bulmer
Simon Bulmer University of Sheffield
Kevin Featherstone
Kevin Featherstone London School of Economics and Political Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science opens diverse doors for further education and meaningful careers. Many students find value in supplementing their knowledge with related fields. For those interested in quantitative methods or policy analysis, exploring the best online math degrees can provide essential skills in data analysis and critical thinking.

Political Science majors also benefit from strong research abilities. If you’re intrigued by organizing information or managing resources, consider universities that offer library science degrees. This path leads to roles in archives, public institutions, and information management.

Context is crucial in understanding governance and policy. Pairing your political studies with history related degrees helps deepen your grasp of cultural and societal shifts that influence decision-making.

For those seeking maximum flexibility, an interdisciplinary studies degree online allows you to combine Political Science with other subjects tailored to your specific interests and career goals. By exploring these educational options, you’ll gain a broader foundation—ready to pursue diverse opportunities in government, education, law, business, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Lucia Quaglia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles