World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
L. B. A. Van De Putte

L. B. A. Van De Putte

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 84 14873 570 357 35758

L. B. A. Van De Putte publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by L. B. A. Van De Putte between 1973 and 2012, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. L. B. A. Van De Putte published across 40 years, from 1973 to 2012, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 1993. 3 of the 361 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2012. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 1993. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 9 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 10 publications 1985: 11 publications 1986: 13 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 17 publications 1989: 18 publications 1990: 19 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 26 publications 1994: 19 publications 1995: 23 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 17 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 22 publications 2001: 25 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication
1973 2012

361 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
L. B. A. Van De Putte: publications per year, 1973 to 2012
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 1
1977 2
1978 1
1979 2
1980 3
1981 3
1982 9
1983 4
1984 10
1985 11
1986 13
1987 10
1988 17
1989 18
1990 19
1991 9
1992 16
1993 26
1994 19
1995 23
1996 12
1997 12
1998 17
1999 11
2000 22
2001 25
2002 8
2003 7
2004 5
2005 3
2006 2
2007 5
2008 6
2009 5
2010 1
2011 2
2012 1
Total 361
Download as CSV

L. B. A. Van De Putte publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L. B. A. Van De Putte sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 357 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 357
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

L. B. A. Van De Putte D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L. B. A. Van De Putte sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 84
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

L. B. A. Van De Putte is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their academic profile is characterized by involvement in research without specified recent publications or documentation of frequent co-authors.

No recent papers, including titles, years of publication, or venues, have been listed for this researcher. Similarly, there is no detailed data on frequent co-authors or preferred publication venues associated with their work.

The scientist's research fields, subfields, and main topics of study have not been explicitly documented. Consequently, there is no available information regarding the specific academic domains or thematic interests they focus on in their scholarly activities.

No records of book publications or awards have been provided in the available data, indicating an absence of publicly listed contributions of this nature.

Based on the current information, the professional footprint of L. B. A. Van De Putte at Radboud University remains foundational but lacks detailed publicly accessible outputs or distinctions.

Best Publications

  • Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts : development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    M.L.L. Prevoo;M.A. van 't Hof;H.H. Kuper;M.A. van Leeuwen

  • Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organization/International League Against Rheumatism criteria

    A.M. van Gestel;M.L.L. Prevoo;M.A. van 't Hof;M.H. van Rijswijk

  • Citrulline is an essential constituent of antigenic determinants recognized by rheumatoid arthritis-specific autoantibodies.

    G.A. Schellekens;B.A. de Jong;F.H.J. van den Hoogen;L.B.A. van de Putte

  • Judging disease activity in clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis: first step in the development of a disease activity score.

    D M van der Heijde;M A van 't Hof;P L van Riel;L A Theunisse

  • The prognostic value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis.

    E.J.A. Kroot;B.A.W. de Jong;M.A. van Leeuwen;H.L. Swinkels

  • Assessment of outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: an extended radiographic scoring system

    M.C.W. Creemers;M.J.A.M. Franssen;M.A. van 't Hof;F.W.J. Gribnau

  • Efficacy and safety of adalimumab as monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis for whom previous disease modifying antirheumatic drug treatment has failed

    L B A van de Putte;C Atkins;M Malaise;J Sany

  • Yet more evidence that osteoarthritis is not a cartilage disease

    K D Brandt;E L Radin;P A Dieppe;L van de Putte

  • Low-dose prednisone induces rapid reversible axial bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis : a randomized, controlled study

    R. F. J. M. Laan;P. L. C. M. Van Riel;L. B. A. Van De Putte;L. J. T. O. Van Erning

  • Effect of folic or folinic acid supplementation on the toxicity and efficacy of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a forty-eight week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

    A E van Ede;R F Laan;M J Rood;T W Huizinga

  • REMISSION IN A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. AMERICAN RHEUMATISM ASSOCIATION PRELIMINARY REMISSION CRITERIA IN RELATION TO THE DISEASE ACTIVITY SCORE

    M.L.L. Prevoo;A.M. van Gestel;M.A. van 't Hof;M.H. van Rijswijk

  • Validity of single variables and composite indices for measuring disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis.

    D. M. F. M. Van Der Heijde;M. A. Van't Hof;P. L. C. M. Van Riel;M. A. Van Leeuwen

  • COMPARISON OF METHOTREXATE WITH PLACEBO IN THE TREATMENT OF SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS: A 24 WEEK RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL, FOLLOWED BY A 24 WEEK OBSERVATIONAL TRIAL

    F. H. J. Van Den Hoogen;A. M. T. Boerbooms;A. J. G. Swaak;J. J. Rasker

  • PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR RADIOGRAPHIC DAMAGE AND PHYSICAL DISABILITY IN EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. A PROSPECTIVE FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF 147 PATIENTS

    D. M. F. M. Van Der Heijde;P. L. C. M. Van Riel;M. A. Van Leeuwen;M. A. Van't Hof

  • Phase I/II trial of autologous stem cell transplantation in systemic sclerosis: procedure related mortality and impact on skin disease.

    M Binks;J. R. Passweg;D. Furst;P. Mcsweeney

  • Interrelationship of outcome measures and process variables in early rheumatoid arthritis. A comparison of radiologic damage, physical disability, joint counts, and acute phase reactants

    M. A. Van Leeuwen;D. M. F. M. Van Der Heijde;M. H. Van Rijswijk;P. M. Houtman

  • Combination of sulphasalazine and methotrexate versus the single components in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled, double-blind, 52 week clinical trial.

    C.J. Haagsma;P.L.C.M. van Riel;A.J.L. de Jong;L.B.A. van de Putte

  • Radiographic progression on radiographs of hands and feet during the first 3 years of rheumatoid arthritis measured according to Sharp's method (van der Heijde modification)

    D.M.F.M. van der Heijde;M.A. van Leeuwen;P.L.C.M. van Riel;L.B.A. van de Putte

  • Cross-reactivity of human and murine anti-DNA antibodies with heparan sulfate. The major glycosaminoglycan in glomerular basement membranes.

    P. Faaber;T. P. M. Rijke;L. B. A. Van De Putte;P. J. A. Capel

  • Efficacy and safety of the fully human anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody adalimumab (D2E7) in DMARD refractory patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 12 week, phase II study.

    L. B. A. van de Putte;R. Rau;F. C. Breedveld;J. R. Kalden

Frequent Co-Authors

P.L.C.M. van Riel
P.L.C.M. van Riel Radboud University
Pilar Barrera
Pilar Barrera Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
W. J. Van Venrooij
W. J. Van Venrooij Radboud University
Paul Emery
Paul Emery University of Leeds
Ferdinand C. Breedveld
Ferdinand C. Breedveld Leiden University Medical Center
Alejandro Balsa
Alejandro Balsa Hospital Universitario La Paz
Joost Schalkwijk
Joost Schalkwijk Radboud University
Jan P. Vandenbroucke
Jan P. Vandenbroucke Leiden University Medical Center
Paola Migliorini
Paola Migliorini University of Pisa
Richard J. Rodenburg
Richard J. Rodenburg Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those considering medical careers beyond becoming a physician, the USA offers diverse online degrees that open doors in healthcare. One such pathway is the health administration degree, which is ideal for students interested in healthcare management and leadership roles at hospitals or clinics.

Registered nurses hoping to advance their practice can explore flexible rn to fnp bridge programs that provide an online route from an ADN to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner—expanding career options and clinical skills without needing to step away from work.

Those interested in nutrition and wellness may want to look into an online dietitian degree, which can prepare graduates for roles in hospitals, private practice, or community health settings.

Leadership-oriented professionals may also pursue a CAHME-recognized degree by referencing the cahme accredited online mha programs list, ensuring their educational credentials meet the highest standards for health administration.

These online pathways provide unique opportunities for aspiring healthcare professionals to specialize and advance their careers conveniently and efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing L. B. A. Van De Putte

Recently Published Articles