World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
33
Citations
3545
World Ranking
3074
National Ranking
88

Kotha Gangadhar publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kotha Gangadhar sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 164 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Kotha Gangadhar D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kotha Gangadhar sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Internal heat generation on bioconvection of an MHD nanofluid flow due to gyrotactic microorganisms

    Gangadhar Kotha;Venkata Ramana Kolipaula;Munagala Venkata Subba Rao;Surekha Penki

  • Oldroyd-B Nanoliquid Flow Through a Triple Stratified Medium Submerged with Gyrotactic Bioconvection and Nonlinear Radiations

    Unknown

  • EMHD Flow of Radiative Second-Grade Nanofluid over a Riga Plate due to Convective Heating: Revised Buongiorno’s Nanofluid Model

    Kotha Gangadhar;Manda Aruna Kumari;Ali J. Chamkha

  • Bioconvective magnetized oldroyd-B nanofluid flow in the presence of Joule heating with gyrotactic microorganisms

    Unknown

  • Bioconvection in a Convectional Nanofluid Flow Containing Gyrotactic Microorganisms over an Isothermal Vertical Cone Embedded in a Porous Surface with Chemical Reactive Species

    M. Venkata Subba Rao;K. Gangadhar;Ali J. Chamkha;P. Surekha

  • Nodal/Saddle Stagnation Point Slip Flow of an Aqueous Convectional Magnesium Oxide–Gold Hybrid Nanofluid with Viscous Dissipation

    Unknown

  • Cattaneo–Christov heat flux theory on transverse MHD Oldroyd-B liquid over nonlinear stretched flow

    K. Venkata Ramana;K. Gangadhar;T. Kannan;Ali J. Chamkha

  • Magnetohydrodynamic micropolar nanofluid past a permeable stretching/shrinking sheet with Newtonian heating

    Unknown

  • Exponential space-dependent heat generation on Powell–Eyring hybrid nanoliquid under nonlinear thermal radiation

    Unknown

  • Entropy minimization on magnetized Boussinesq couple stress fluid with non-uniform heat generation

    Gangadhar K;Naga Bhargavi D;Venkata Subba Rao M;Ali J Chamkha

  • Thermal energy transport of radioactive nanofluid flow submerged with microorganisms with zero mass flux condition

    Unknown

  • Biconvective transport of magnetized couple stress fluid over a radiative paraboloid of revolution

    Unknown

  • Analysis of Carreau triple nanoparticle suspension on flow over an elongating surface with ohmic dissipation

    Unknown

  • Impact of Arrhenius energy and irregular heat absorption on generalized second grade fluid MHD flow over nonlinear elongating surface with thermal radiation and Cattaneo–Christov heat flux theory

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of homogeneous-heterogeneous chemical response on Maxwell-fluid flow through spiraling disks with nonlinear thermal radiation using numerical and regularized machine learning methods

    Unknown

  • Irreversibility analysis for the EMHD flow of silver and magnesium oxide hybrid nanofluid due to nonlinear thermal radiation

    Unknown

  • Generalized slip impact of Casson nanofluid through cylinder implanted in swimming gyrotactic microorganisms

    Unknown

  • Wall jet plasma fluid flow problem for hybrid nanofluids with Joule heating

    Unknown

  • Stagnation point of the triple nanoparticle nanofluid flow through the spinning sphere with radiation absorption

    Unknown

  • Graphene-gold/PDMS Maxwell hybrid nanofluidic flow in a squeezed channel with linear and irregular radiations

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Ali J. Chamkha
Ali J. Chamkha Kuwait College of Science and Technology
Oluwole Daniel Makinde
Oluwole Daniel Makinde Stellenbosch University
Giulio Lorenzini
Giulio Lorenzini University of Parma
sunil kumar
sunil kumar National Institute of Technology Jamshedpur

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering offer exciting academic and career opportunities, many students also explore related or complementary fields. Understanding various career pathways and their educational requirements can help you make informed decisions about your future.

For those interested in professions involving psychological and behavioral expertise, exploring the fbi profiler salary and job outlook provides valuable insights into careers that blend analytical skills with behavioral science. Similarly, those interested in supporting individuals through mental health might consider the type of counselors and the pathways to become one.

If you’re seeking a more accessible entry point into counseling, programs listed under the easiest degree in counseling can offer streamlined options to start your career efficiently. For those aiming at advanced credentials swiftly, exploring the bcba accelerated program highlights accelerated paths to becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst.

Exploring these diverse educational options alongside engineering can broaden your skills and open up unique interdisciplinary career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Kotha Gangadhar

Recently Published Articles