World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 33 3074 2890 88 87 164 3545

Kotha Gangadhar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kotha Gangadhar between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kotha Gangadhar published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2024. 42 of the 174 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2024. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 13 publications
2008 2025

174 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kotha Gangadhar: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 4
2013 2
2014 4
2015 10
2016 4
2017 7
2018 12
2019 7
2020 14
2021 21
2022 27
2023 19
2024 29
2025 13
Total 174
Download as CSV

Kotha Gangadhar publications per year - data summary

  • Kotha Gangadhar, a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scholar from Acharya Nagarjuna University, has 174 publications recorded across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2008 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2024, with 29 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2008, with 1 publication.
  • 3 of the 18 years in the span carry no publications at all (2009, 2010 and 2011).
  • The rate of publication averages 9.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 11.6 per year counting only the 15 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 109 publications, 63% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2008-2013: 7 publications (1.2 per year); 2014-2019: 44 publications (7.3 per year); 2020-2025: 123 publications (20.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Kotha Gangadhar publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kotha Gangadhar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 157–166 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 164 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132 164
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Kotha Gangadhar publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,445 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 63 ranges running from 47–56 to 659+ publications.
  • Kotha Gangadhar, a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scholar from Acharya Nagarjuna University, records 164 publications - the 30th percentile of the discipline.
  • 30% of ranked Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists score the same or lower than Kotha Gangadhar, and about 70% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 217–226 publications range, and Kotha Gangadhar ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 147–156 publications, holding 155 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 46% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 197–206 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 659 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Kotha Gangadhar D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kotha Gangadhar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153 33
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Kotha Gangadhar D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,445 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 64 ranges running from 30 to 93+ D-Index.
  • Kotha Gangadhar, a Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scholar from Acharya Nagarjuna University, records 33 D-Index - the 14th percentile of the discipline.
  • 14% of ranked Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists score the same or lower than Kotha Gangadhar, and about 86% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 43 D-Index range, and Kotha Gangadhar ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 34 D-Index, holding 189 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 45 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Best Publications

  • Internal heat generation on bioconvection of an MHD nanofluid flow due to gyrotactic microorganisms

    Gangadhar Kotha;Venkata Ramana Kolipaula;Munagala Venkata Subba Rao;Surekha Penki

  • Oldroyd-B Nanoliquid Flow Through a Triple Stratified Medium Submerged with Gyrotactic Bioconvection and Nonlinear Radiations

    Unknown

  • EMHD Flow of Radiative Second-Grade Nanofluid over a Riga Plate due to Convective Heating: Revised Buongiorno’s Nanofluid Model

    Kotha Gangadhar;Manda Aruna Kumari;Ali J. Chamkha

  • Bioconvective magnetized oldroyd-B nanofluid flow in the presence of Joule heating with gyrotactic microorganisms

    Unknown

  • Bioconvection in a Convectional Nanofluid Flow Containing Gyrotactic Microorganisms over an Isothermal Vertical Cone Embedded in a Porous Surface with Chemical Reactive Species

    M. Venkata Subba Rao;K. Gangadhar;Ali J. Chamkha;P. Surekha

  • Nodal/Saddle Stagnation Point Slip Flow of an Aqueous Convectional Magnesium Oxide–Gold Hybrid Nanofluid with Viscous Dissipation

    Unknown

  • Cattaneo–Christov heat flux theory on transverse MHD Oldroyd-B liquid over nonlinear stretched flow

    K. Venkata Ramana;K. Gangadhar;T. Kannan;Ali J. Chamkha

  • Magnetohydrodynamic micropolar nanofluid past a permeable stretching/shrinking sheet with Newtonian heating

    Unknown

  • Exponential space-dependent heat generation on Powell–Eyring hybrid nanoliquid under nonlinear thermal radiation

    Unknown

  • Entropy minimization on magnetized Boussinesq couple stress fluid with non-uniform heat generation

    Gangadhar K;Naga Bhargavi D;Venkata Subba Rao M;Ali J Chamkha

  • Thermal energy transport of radioactive nanofluid flow submerged with microorganisms with zero mass flux condition

    Unknown

  • Analysis of Carreau triple nanoparticle suspension on flow over an elongating surface with ohmic dissipation

    Unknown

  • Impact of Arrhenius energy and irregular heat absorption on generalized second grade fluid MHD flow over nonlinear elongating surface with thermal radiation and Cattaneo–Christov heat flux theory

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of homogeneous-heterogeneous chemical response on Maxwell-fluid flow through spiraling disks with nonlinear thermal radiation using numerical and regularized machine learning methods

    Unknown

  • Irreversibility analysis for the EMHD flow of silver and magnesium oxide hybrid nanofluid due to nonlinear thermal radiation

    Unknown

  • Generalized slip impact of Casson nanofluid through cylinder implanted in swimming gyrotactic microorganisms

    Unknown

  • Wall jet plasma fluid flow problem for hybrid nanofluids with Joule heating

    Unknown

  • Stagnation point of the triple nanoparticle nanofluid flow through the spinning sphere with radiation absorption

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Ali J. Chamkha
Ali J. Chamkha Kuwait College of Science and Technology
Oluwole Daniel Makinde
Oluwole Daniel Makinde Stellenbosch University
Giulio Lorenzini
Giulio Lorenzini University of Parma
sunil kumar
sunil kumar National Institute of Technology Jamshedpur

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering offer exciting academic and career opportunities, many students also explore related or complementary fields. Understanding various career pathways and their educational requirements can help you make informed decisions about your future.

For those interested in professions involving psychological and behavioral expertise, exploring the fbi profiler salary and job outlook provides valuable insights into careers that blend analytical skills with behavioral science. Similarly, those interested in supporting individuals through mental health might consider the type of counselors and the pathways to become one.

If you’re seeking a more accessible entry point into counseling, programs listed under the easiest degree in counseling can offer streamlined options to start your career efficiently. For those aiming at advanced credentials swiftly, exploring the bcba accelerated program highlights accelerated paths to becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst.

Exploring these diverse educational options alongside engineering can broaden your skills and open up unique interdisciplinary career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Kotha Gangadhar

Recently Published Articles