World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
5526
World Ranking
10454
National Ranking
98

K. Gunnar Götestam publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. Gunnar Götestam sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 120 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

K. Gunnar Götestam D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. Gunnar Götestam sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

K. Gunnar Götestam was affiliated with the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Norway. Their professional career was connected primarily to this institution.

During their academic tenure, Götestam's work did not register publicly documented recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications in widely accessible databases. This limits the availability of detailed insight into their specific research outputs or collaborative networks.

No information is available regarding the main fields or subfields of study associated with Götestam. Similarly, no main topics of work have been documented that would outline the thematic focus of their research activities.

There is no record of awards attributed to Götestam, and the public academic impact, measured by citations or recognized honors, appears unreported. Their scientific footprint, as reflected in available data, does not show specific honors or distinctions.

K. Gunnar Götestam was deceased as of the latest records. The available data offers a limited scope of their contributions, primarily highlighting their institutional affiliation rather than detailed scholarly output or recognition.

Best Publications

  • Risk factors for problematic gambling: a critical literature review.

    Agneta Johansson;Jon E. Grant;Suck Won Kim;Brian L. Odlaug

  • Internet addiction: characteristics of a questionnaire and prevalence in Norwegian youth (12-18 years)

    Agneta Johansson;K. Gunnar Götestam

  • Internet addiction among Norwegian adults: A stratified probability sample study

    Inger Johanne Bakken;Hanne Gro Wenzel;K. Gunnar Götestam;Agneta Johansson

  • Prevalence of eating disorders in female and male adolescents (14–15 years)

    Einar Kjelsås;Christian Bjørnstrøm;K.Gunnar Götestam

  • General population-based epidemiological study of eating disorders in Norway

    K. Gunnar Götestam;W. Stewart Agras

  • Treatment motivation, treatment expectancy, and helping alliance as predictors of outcome in cognitive behavioral treatment of OCD.

    Patrick A. Vogel;Bjarne Hansen;Tore C. Stiles;K. Gunnar Götestam

  • The effect of guided imagery and amitriptyline on daily fibromyalgia pain: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

    Egil A Fors;Harold Sexton;K.Gunnar Götestam

  • Problems with computer games without monetary reward: similarity to pathological gambling.

    Agneta Johansson;K. Gunnar Götestam

  • Excessive Computer Game Playing among Norwegian Adults: Self-Reported Consequences of Playing and Association with Mental Health Problems

    Unknown

  • An open clinical trial of cognitive-behaviour therapy in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder administered in regular outpatient clinics.

    Robert Valderhaug;Bo Larsson;K. Gunnar Götestam;John Piacentini

  • ADDING COGNITIVE THERAPY ELEMENTS TO EXPOSURE THERAPY FOR OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER: A CONTROLLED STUDY

    Patrick A. Vogel;Tore C. Stiles;K. Gunnar Götestam

  • A controlled study of the effects of applied relaxation and applied relaxation plus operant procedures in the regulation of chronic pain

    Steven J. Linton;K. Gunnar Götestam

  • THE EFFECTS OF REARRANGING WARD ROUTINES ON COMMUNICATION AND EATING BEHAVIORS OF PSYCHOGERIATRIC PATIENTS

    Unknown

  • Characteristics of gambling and problematic gambling in the Norwegian context: A DSM-IV-based telephone interview study

    K.Gunnar Götestam;Agneta Johansson

  • Social skills training in groups for alcoholics: One-year treatment outcome for groups and individuals.

    Lasse Eriksen;Sverre Björnstad;K.Gunnar Götestam

  • Validation of the lie/bet screen for pathological gambling on two normal population data sets.

    K. Gunnar Götestam;Agneta Johansson;Hanne Gro Wenzel;Inge-Ernald Simonsen

  • Gambling behavior and gambling problems in Norway 2007

    Inger Johanne Bakken;K. Gunnar Götestam;Rolf W. Gråwe;Hanne Gro Wenzel

  • Behavioral Analysis of Chronic Pain and Its Management

    Steven J. Linton;Lennart Melin;K. Gunnar Götestam

  • Controlling pain reports through operant conditioning: a laboratory demonstration

    Steven J. Linton;K. Gunnar Götestam

  • Gambling and problematic gambling with money among Norwegian youth (12-18 years).

    Agneta Johansson;K Gunnar Götestam

  • Clinicians' views on management of obsessive-compulsive disorders in children and adolescents.

    Robert Valderhaug;K Gunnar Götestam;Bo Larsson

  • Time trends in obesity and eating disorders

    Henrik Daae Zachrisson;Einar Vedul-Kjelsås Md;K. Gunnar Götestam Md;Arnstein Mykletun;Arnstein Mykletun

Frequent Co-Authors

Lennart Melin
Lennart Melin Uppsala University
Tore C. Stiles
Tore C. Stiles Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Torbjørn Rundmo
Torbjørn Rundmo Norwegian University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their career options beyond a traditional Psychology degree, online programs in Social Work offer a flexible and impactful pathway. Social Work and Psychology often intersect, especially in counseling, community outreach, and mental health roles.

If affordability is a top concern, you can explore various programs tailored to your budget and location. For example, affordable online social work master's programs in Texas provide options for Texas residents seeking accessible graduate education. Students nationwide can also benefit from reviewing the cheapest online msw degrees in USA, making advanced study possible without high levels of student debt.

Those in specific states have additional choices. Ohio learners can find affordable online social work degrees in Ohio, while Tennessee residents may review the most affordable online social work degree programs in Tennessee.

By considering both Psychology and affordable online Social Work degrees, students can access a wider range of career paths such as therapy, case management, and advocacy, all while managing educational costs.

Best Scientists Citing K. Gunnar Götestam

Recently Published Articles