World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
40
Citations
7026
World Ranking
2011
National Ranking
749

K. C. Park publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. C. Park sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 220 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

K. C. Park D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where K. C. Park sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Partitioned analysis of coupled mechanical systems

    Carlos A. Felippa;K.C. Park;Charbel Farhat

  • Staggered transient analysis procedures for coupled mechanical systems: Formulation

    Carlos A. Felippa;K. C. Park

  • A Curved C0 Shell Element Based on Assumed Natural-Coordinate Strains

    Unknown

  • A variational principle for the formulation of partitioned structural systems

    K. C. Park;Carlos A. Felippa

  • An Improved Stiffly Stable Method for Direct Integration of Nonlinear Structural Dynamic Equations

    Unknown

  • Partitioned Transient Analysis Procedures for Coupled-Field Problems: Accuracy Analysis

    K. C. Park;Carlos A. Felippa

  • A simple algorithm for localized construction of non‐matching structural interfaces

    K. C. Park;Carlos Felippa;G. Rebel

  • A localized version of the method of Lagrange multipliers and its applications

    K. C. Park;Carlos A. Felippa;U. A. Gumaste

  • A Variational Framework for Solution Method Developments in Structural Mechanics

    K. C. Park;Carlos A. Felippa

  • Partitioned formulation of internal fluid–structure interaction problems by localized Lagrange multipliers

    Kwang-Chun Park;Carlos A. Felippa;Roger Ohayon

  • Structural system identification: from reality to models

    Unknown

  • An unconditionally stable staggered algorithm for transient finite element analysis of coupled thermoelastic problems

    Charbel Farhat;K. C. Park;Yves Dubois-Pelerin

  • Second-order structural identification procedure via state-space-based system identification

    Unknown

  • An algebraically partitioned FETI method for parallel structural analysis: algorithm description

    K. C. Park;Manoel R. Justino;Carlos A. Felippa

  • Stabilization of computational procedures for constrained dynamical systems

    Unknown

  • The impact of yaw error on aeroelastic characteristics of a horizontal axis wind turbine blade

    Min-Soo Jeong;Sang-Woo Kim;In Lee;Seung-Jae Yoo

  • Partitioned Component Mode Synthesis via a Flexibility Approach

    Unknown

  • Practical aspects of numerical time integration

    Unknown

  • Extraction of Impulse Response Data via Wavelet Transform for Structural System Identification

    Unknown

  • Treatment of acoustic fluid–structure interaction by localized Lagrange multipliers and comparison to alternative interface-coupling methods

    Michael R. Ross;Michael A. Sprague;Carlos A. Felippa;K.C. Park

Frequent Co-Authors

Charbel Farhat
Charbel Farhat Stanford University
Phill-Seung Lee
Phill-Seung Lee Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Adnan Ibrahimbegovic
Adnan Ibrahimbegovic University of Technology of Compiègne
Carlos A. Felippa
Carlos A. Felippa University of Colorado Boulder
Bernd Markert
Bernd Markert RWTH Aachen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While studying Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in the USA opens doors to innovative tech careers, many students consider complementary or alternative fields to enhance their skill set or explore new directions. For example, understanding human behavior can be crucial in engineering design teams or leadership roles. Pursuing programs like the fastest BCBA program offers practical psychology knowledge tailored for applied behavioral analysis.

For those interested in helping others, counseling degree options provide a pathway into mental health professions. Even if time is a constraint, some students explore best easiest counseling degree programs that offer flexible online formats.

Some may even find inspiration from unique career paths such as forensic psychology, combining analytical skillsets with criminal profiling. Learning how to become an FBI profiler requires a distinct educational route but underscores the diversity of careers linked to strong analytical and scientific backgrounds.

Exploring these avenues alongside engineering studies can broaden career horizons and provide versatile skills attractive to employers.

Best Scientists Citing K. C. Park

Recently Published Articles