World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
46
Citations
9443
World Ranking
18883
National Ranking
1473

Judith K. Pell publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith K. Pell sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 167 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Judith K. Pell D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith K. Pell sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Judith K. Pell is affiliated with Rothamsted Research in the United Kingdom, focusing on topics within Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their research spans several subfields including Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, and Plant Science.

The scientist's work covers key topics such as plant and animal studies, insect and pesticide research, and plant parasitism and resistance. These areas reflect a concentration on understanding biological interactions and the impact of environmental factors on agriculture and ecosystems.

Judith K. Pell has contributed to research published primarily in the journal Landscape Ecology. Notable recent work includes the 2020 publication titled "Mass-flowering crops have a greater impact than semi-natural habitat on crop pollinators and pollen deposition" appearing in Landscape Ecology.

Frequent collaborators in their research activities include Rosalind F. Shaw, Benjamin B. Phillips, Toby Doyle, John W. Redhead, and Joanna Savage. These coauthors have jointly contributed to advancing knowledge in relevant fields.

  • Mass-flowering crops have a greater impact than semi-natural habitat on crop pollinators and pollen deposition (2020, Landscape Ecology)

  • Rosalind F. Shaw
  • Benjamin B. Phillips
  • Toby Doyle
  • John W. Redhead
  • Joanna Savage

  • Landscape Ecology

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Insect Science
  • Plant Science

  • Plant and animal studies
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Plant Parasitism and Resistance

Best Publications

  • Entomopathogenic fungi as biological control agents.

    P. A. Shah;J. K. Pell

  • Fungal entomopathogens: new insights on their ecology

    Fernando E. Vega;Mark S. Goettel;Meredith Blackwell;David Chandler

  • BIZARRE INTERACTIONS AND ENDGAMES: Entomopathogenic Fungi and Their Arthropod Hosts

    Helen E. Roy;D.C. Steinkraus;Joergen Eilenberg;A.E. Hajek

  • Melanism and disease resistance in insects

    Kenneth Wilson;Sheena C. Cotter;Andrew Francis Reeson;Judith K. Pell

  • A functional overview of conservation biological control

    Graham S. Begg;Samantha M. Cook;Richard Dye;Marco Ferrante

  • Fungal Biocontrol of Acari

    D. Chandler;G. Davidson;J. K. Pell;B. V. Ball

  • Intraguild predation involving Harmonia axyridis : a review of current knowledge and future perspectives

    Judith K. Pell;Jason Baverstock;Helen E. Roy;Remy L. Ware

  • Interactions between entomopathogenic fungi and other natural enemies: implications for biological control.

    Helen E. Roy;Judith K. Pell

  • Biology, ecology and pest management potential of entomophthorales.

    J. K. Pell;J. Eilenberg;A. E. Hajek;D. C. Steinkraus

  • Laboratory evaluation of temperature effects on the germination and growth of entomopathogenic fungi and on their pathogenicity to two aphid species.

    Helen Yeo;Judith K Pell;Peter G Alderson;Suzanne J Clark

  • Food web structure of three guilds of natural enemies: predators, parasitoids and pathogens of aphids

    F. J. F. Van Veen;C. B. Müller;J. K. Pell;H. C. J. Godfray

  • Entomopathogenic fungi and insect behaviour: from unsuspecting hosts to targeted vectors

    Jason Baverstock;Helen E. Roy;Judith K. Pell

  • Detection and avoidance of an entomopathogenic fungus by a generalist insect predator

    Nicolai V. Meyling;Judith K. Pell

  • Conservation biological control using fungal entomopathogens

    J. K. Pell;J. J. Hannam;D. C. Steinkraus

  • Laboratory bioassays to assess the pathogenicity of mitosporic fungi to Varroa destructor (Acari: Mesostigmata), an ectoparasitic mite of the honeybee, Apis mellifera

    Katie E Shaw;Gillian Davidson;Suzanne J Clark;Brenda V Ball

  • Challenges in modelling complexity of fungal entomopathogens in semi-natural populations of insects

    Helen Hesketh;Helen E. Roy;J. Eilenberg;J.K. Pell

  • Implications of Predator Foraging on Aphid Pathogen Dynamics

    H.E Roy;J.K Pell;S.J Clark;P.G Alderson

  • Influence of pesticide use on the natural occurrence of entomopathogenic fungi in arable soils in the UK: field and laboratory comparisons.

    R. T. Mietkiewski;J. K. Pell;S. J. Clark

  • Dissemination of Beneficial Microbial Agents by Insects

    Fernando E. Vega;Patrick F. Dowd;Lawrence A. Lacey;Judith K. Pell

  • Interactions between two aphid natural enemies, the entomopathogenic fungus Erynia neoaphidis Remaudiere & Hennebert (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales) and the predatory beetle Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)

    J.K. Pell;R. Pluke;S.J. Clark;M.G. Kenward

Frequent Co-Authors

Helen E. Roy
Helen E. Roy Anglia Ruskin University
Suzanne J. Clark
Suzanne J. Clark Rothamsted Research
K. D. Sunderland
K. D. Sunderland University of Warwick
Michael E. N. Majerus
Michael E. N. Majerus University of Cambridge
Rosemary S. Hails
Rosemary S. Hails Mansfield University
Tariq M. Butt
Tariq M. Butt Swansea University
Ann E. Hajek
Ann E. Hajek Cornell University
Juliet L. Osborne
Juliet L. Osborne University of Exeter
Guy M. Poppy
Guy M. Poppy University of Southampton
Ingrid H. Williams
Ingrid H. Williams Estonian University of Life Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Judith K. Pell

Trending Scientists