World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
7453
World Ranking
8714
National Ranking
651

Jonathan L.C. Lee publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan L.C. Lee sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 58 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jonathan L.C. Lee D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan L.C. Lee sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan L.C. Lee is a researcher affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily spans the field of neuroscience, with a specific focus on cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, artificial intelligence, and computational theory and mathematics.

Their research covers several main topics, including:

  • Memory and neural mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and neuropharmacology research
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • CRISPR and genetic engineering
  • Cryptography and data security
  • Stress responses and cortisol
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Jonathan L.C. Lee has contributed to publications in various scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Behavioural Brain Research
  • Learning & Memory
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Their recent papers include:

  • Phenotypic drug discovery: recent successes, lessons learned and new directions (2022), Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
  • Self-delivering, chemically modified CRISPR RNAs for AAV co-delivery and genome editing in vivo (2023), Nucleic Acids Research
  • Enumerating regular expressions and their languages (2021), EMS Press eBooks
  • Verifiable state machines (2020), ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review
  • Procedures between training and reactivation influence the destabilization of instrumental sucrose memory (2022), Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Chaoran Cheng
  • Srinath Setty
  • Mohamed Lamine Dramé
  • Maria Bălăeţ
  • Charlotte R. Flavell

Best Publications

  • Independent Cellular Processes for Hippocampal Memory Consolidation and Reconsolidation

    Jonathan L.C. Lee;Barry J. Everitt;Kerrie Lorraine Thomas

  • Reconsolidation and Extinction of Conditioned Fear: Inhibition and Potentiation

    Jonathan L. C. Lee;Amy L. Milton;Barry J. Everitt

  • Reconsolidation: maintaining memory relevance

    Jonathan L.C. Lee

  • An update on memory reconsolidation updating

    Jonathan L.C. Lee;Karim Nader;Daniela Schiller

  • Memory reconsolidation mediates the strengthening of memories by additional learning.

    Jonathan L C Lee

  • Disrupting Reconsolidation of Drug Memories Reduces Cocaine-Seeking Behavior

    Jonathan L. C. Lee;Patricia Di Ciano;Kerrie Lorraine Thomas;Barry J. Everitt

  • Cue-Induced Cocaine Seeking and Relapse Are Reduced by Disruption of Drug Memory Reconsolidation

    Jonathan L. C. Lee;Amy L. Milton;Barry J. Everitt

  • Intra-Amygdala and Systemic Antagonism of NMDA Receptors Prevents the Reconsolidation of Drug-Associated Memory and Impairs Subsequently Both Novel and Previously Acquired Drug-Seeking Behaviors

    Amy L. Milton;Jonathan L. C. Lee;Victoria J. Butler;Richard Gardner

  • Updating memories—The role of prediction errors in memory reconsolidation

    Marc T.J. Exton-McGuinness;Jonathan L.C. Lee;Amy C. Reichelt;Amy C. Reichelt

  • Memory Reconsolidation Mediates the Updating of Hippocampal Memory Content

    Jonathan L C Lee

  • Reconsolidation of appetitive memories for both natural and drug reinforcement is dependent on β-adrenergic receptors

    Amy L. Milton;Jonathan L.C. Lee;Barry J. Everitt

  • Cannabidiol regulation of emotion and emotional memory processing: relevance for treating anxiety‐related and substance abuse disorders

    Jonathan L C Lee;Leandro J Bertoglio;Francisco S Guimarães;Carl W Stevenson

  • Behavioural memory reconsolidation of food and fear memories

    Charlotte R. Flavell;David J. Barber;Jonathan L. C. Lee

  • The retrosplenial cortex is involved in the formation of memory for context and trace fear conditioning.

    Janine L. Kwapis;Timothy J. Jarome;Jonathan L. Lee;Fred J. Helmstetter

  • A Humanized Anti-VEGF Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody Inhibits Angiogenesis and Blocks Tumor Growth in Xenograft Models

    Yanlan Yu;Pierre Lee;Yaohuang Ke;Yongke Zhang

  • Memory reconsolidation in aversive and appetitive settings

    Amy Claire Reichelt;Amy Claire Reichelt;Jonathan L C Lee

  • Disrupting Reconsolidation of Conditioned Withdrawal Memories in the Basolateral Amygdala Reduces Suppression of Heroin Seeking in Rats

    Kim G C Hellemans;Barry J Everitt;Jonathan L C Lee

  • How to erase memory traces of pain and fear

    Jürgen Sandkühler;Jonathan Lee

  • Ketamine Effects on Memory Reconsolidation Favor a Learning Model of Delusions

    Philip R. Corlett;Victoria Cambridge;Jennifer M. Gardner;Jennifer S. Piggot

  • The Basolateral Amygdala and Nucleus Accumbens Core Mediate Dissociable Aspects of Drug Memory Reconsolidation.

    Florence R.M. Théberge;Amy L. Milton;David Belin;Jonathan L.C. Lee

  • Appetitive memory reconsolidation depends upon NMDA receptor-mediated neurotransmission.

    Jonathan L.C. Lee;Barry J. Everitt

Frequent Co-Authors

Barry J. Everitt
Barry J. Everitt University of Cambridge
Anthony Dickinson
Anthony Dickinson University of Cambridge
Karim Nader
Karim Nader McGill University
Jane R. Taylor
Jane R. Taylor Yale University
Francisco Silveira Guimarães
Francisco Silveira Guimarães Universidade de São Paulo
Paul C. Fletcher
Paul C. Fletcher University of Cambridge
David Belin
David Belin University of Cambridge
Michael R. F. Aitken
Michael R. F. Aitken King's College London
Philip R. Corlett
Philip R. Corlett Yale University
Daniela Schiller
Daniela Schiller Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan L.C. Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles