World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
23415
World Ranking
2829
National Ranking
160

Karim Nader publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karim Nader sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 136 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Karim Nader D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karim Nader sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Karim Nader is affiliated with McGill University in Canada, conducting research primarily in the field of neuroscience. Their scholarly output focuses on various aspects of memory, neural mechanisms, and cognitive neuroscience, with a notable presence in related interdisciplinary topics.

Their main field of study is Neuroscience, within which the subfields they contribute to include:

  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Molecular Biology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Research topics frequently addressed by Nader involve:

  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Digital Games and Media
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts

Karim Nader has authored several recent papers spanning neuroscience and society, including:

  • "eIF2α controls memory consolidation via excitatory and somatostatin neurons," 2020, published in Nature
  • "Public understanding of artificial intelligence through entertainment media," 2022, published in AI & Society
  • "Noradrenergic projections from the locus coeruleus to the amygdala constrain fear memory reconsolidation," 2020, published in eLife
  • "Impairments to Consolidation, Reconsolidation, and Long-Term Memory Maintenance Lead to Memory Erasure," 2020, published in Annual Review of Neuroscience
  • "Virtual competitions and the gamer's dilemma," 2020, published in Ethics and Information Technology

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Josué Haubrich
  • Matteo Bernabo
  • Jean-Claude Lacaille
  • Nahum Sonenberg
  • Karine Gamache

Karim Nader's work has appeared in a variety of publication venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife
  • Nature
  • AI & Society
  • Science Advances

During their career, Karim Nader was recognized as a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2003.

Best Publications

  • Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval

    Karim Nader;Glenn E. Schafe;Joseph E. Le Doux

  • A single standard for memory: the case for reconsolidation.

    Karim Nader;Oliver Hardt

  • Cellular and systems reconsolidation in the hippocampus.

    Jacek Debiec;Jacek Debiec;Joseph E. LeDoux;Karim Nader

  • Memory traces unbound

    Karim Nader

  • The labile nature of consolidation theory.

    Karim Nader;Glenn E. Schafe;Joseph E. LeDoux

  • Effect of post-retrieval propranolol on psychophysiologic responding during subsequent script-driven traumatic imagery in post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Alain Brunet;Scott P. Orr;Scott P. Orr;Jacques Tremblay;Kate Robertson

  • Pharmacological brake-release of mRNA translation enhances cognitive memory

    Carmela Sidrauski;Diego Acosta-Alvear;Arkady Khoutorsky;Punitha Vedantham

  • Memory consolidation of Pavlovian fear conditioning: a cellular and molecular perspective.

    Glenn E Schafe;Karim Nader;Hugh T Blair;Joseph E LeDoux

  • Autism-related deficits via dysregulated eIF4E-dependent translational control

    Christos G. Gkogkas;Arkady Khoutorsky;Israeli Ran;Emmanouil Rampakakis

  • eIF2α Phosphorylation Bidirectionally Regulates the Switch from Short- to Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity and Memory

    Mauro Costa-Mattioli;Delphine Gobert;Elad Stern;Karine Gamache

  • An update on memory reconsolidation updating

    Jonathan L.C. Lee;Karim Nader;Daniela Schiller

  • Different lateral amygdala outputs mediate reactions and actions elicited by a fear-arousing stimulus

    P. Amorapanth;J. E. LeDoux;K. Nader

  • Characterization of Fear Memory Reconsolidation

    Sevil Duvarci;Karim Nader

  • Decay happens: the role of active forgetting in memory

    Oliver Hardt;Karim Nader;Lynn Nadel

  • Memory reconsolidation: an update.

    Karim Nader;Einar Örn Einarsson

  • Translational control of hippocampal synaptic plasticity and memory by the eIF2α kinase, GCN2

    Mauro Costa-Mattioli;Delphine Gobert;Heather Harding;Barbara Herdy

  • Cellular and systems mechanisms of memory strength as a constraint on auditory fear reconsolidation

    Szu-Han Wang;Lucas de Oliveira Alvares;Karim Nader

  • NMDA receptors are critical for unleashing consolidated auditory fear memories.

    Cyrinne Ben Mamou;Karine Gamache;Karim Nader

  • PKMζ maintains memories by regulating GluR2-dependent AMPA receptor trafficking

    Paola Virginia Migues;Oliver Hardt;Dong Chuan Wu;Karine Gamache

  • Damage to the lateral and central, but not other, amygdaloid nuclei prevents the acquisition of auditory fear conditioning.

    Karim Nader;Pedram Majidishad;Prin Amorapanth;Joseph E. LeDoux

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph E. LeDoux
Joseph E. LeDoux New York University
Nahum Sonenberg
Nahum Sonenberg McGill University
Jean-Claude Lacaille
Jean-Claude Lacaille University of Montreal
Roger K. Pitman
Roger K. Pitman Harvard University
Glenn E. Schafe
Glenn E. Schafe City University of New York
Yu Tian Wang
Yu Tian Wang University of British Columbia
Derek van der Kooy
Derek van der Kooy University of Toronto
Satoshi Kida
Satoshi Kida University of Tokyo
Jens C. Pruessner
Jens C. Pruessner University of Konstanz
Valérie Doyère
Valérie Doyère Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Karim Nader

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles