World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
9216
World Ranking
16724
National Ranking
6905

John B. Stokes publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John B. Stokes sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 139 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

John B. Stokes D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John B. Stokes sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

John B. Stokes was affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their research contributions primarily spanned the fields of Medicine and Engineering, with a notable focus on Nephrology, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's work covered a range of main topics including:

  • Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management

John B. Stokes contributed to research published in several peer-reviewed venues. These included:

  • Kidney International
  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ)

The scientist was involved with multiple coauthors who frequently collaborated alongside them. This group included:

  • T. Alp İkizler
  • Chirag R. Parikh
  • Jonathan Himmelfarb
  • Vernon M. Chinchilli
  • Kathleen D. Liu

Among their published papers were:

  • "A prospective cohort study of acute kidney injury and kidney outcomes, cardiovascular events, and death" (2020), published in Kidney International
  • "Outcomes of Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Repair with Contemporary Ventricular Assist Device Implantoutcomes Outcomes of Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Repair with Contemporary Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant" (2024), published in The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • "34. Propofol sensitivity alone can cause alert level loss of TcMEP during corrective surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis" (2024), published in North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ)

Best Publications

  • Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury

    Paul M. Palevsky;Jane Hongyuan Zhang;Theresa Z. O'Connor;Glenn M. Chertow

  • The effects of frequent nocturnal home hemodialysis: the Frequent Hemodialysis Network Nocturnal Trial

    Michael V. Rocco;Robert S. Lockridge;Gerald J. Beck;Paul W. Eggers

  • Mechanism by which Liddle's syndrome mutations increase activity of a human epithelial Na^+ channel

    Peter M. Snyder;Margaret P. Price;Fiona J. McDonald;Christopher M. Adams

  • Disruption of the beta subunit of the epithelial Na+ channel in mice: hyperkalemia and neonatal death associated with a pseudohypoaldosteronism phenotype.

    Fiona J. McDonald;Baoli Yang;Ron F. Hrstka;Heather A. Drummond

  • Membrane topology of the amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channel.

    P M Snyder;F J McDonald;J B Stokes;M J Welsh

  • Prevalence and correlates of cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients: the Frequent Hemodialysis Network trials.

    Manjula Kurella Tamura;Brett Larive;Mark L. Unruh;John B. Stokes

  • Inhibition of the Epithelial Na+ Channel by Interaction of Nedd4 with a PY Motif Deleted in Liddle’s Syndrome

    Christopher C. Goulet;Kenneth A. Volk;Kenneth A. Volk;Christopher M. Adams;Lawrence S. Prince

  • Regulation of rENaC mRNA by dietary NaCl and steroids: organ, tissue, and steroid heterogeneity.

    John B. Stokes;Rita D. Sigmund

  • Glucocorticoid Induction of Epithelial Sodium Channel Expression in Lung and Renal Epithelia Occurs via trans-Activation of a Hormone Response Element in the 5′-Flanking Region of the Human Epithelial Sodium Channel α Subunit Gene

    Raouf Sayegh;Scott D. Auerbach;Xiang Li;Randy W. Loftus

  • Nedd4-2 Modulates Renal Na+-Cl− Cotransporter via the Aldosterone-SGK1-Nedd4-2 Pathway

    Juan Pablo Arroyo;Dagmara Lagnaz;Caroline Ronzaud;Norma Vázquez

  • Salt-sensitive Hypertension and Cardiac Hypertrophy in Mice Deficient in the Ubiquitin Ligase Nedd4-2

    Peijun P. Shi;Xiao R. Cao;Eileen M. Sweezer;Thomas S. Kinney

  • Purification of rat papillary collecting duct cells: functional and metabolic assessment.

    J. B. Stokes;C. Grupp;R. K. Kinne

  • Heterogeneity of the rabbit collecting tubule: Localization of mineralocorticoid hormone action to the cortical portion

    John B. Stokes;Mary Jo Ingram;Allen D. Williams;Duane Ingram

  • Renal tubular NEDD4-2 deficiency causes NCC-mediated salt-dependent hypertension.

    Caroline Ronzaud;Dominique Loffing-Cueni;Pierrette Hausel;Anne Debonneville

  • Glucocorticoid-stimulated lung epithelial Na+ transport is associated with regulated ENaC andsgk1 expression

    Omar A. Itani;Scott D. Auerbach;Russell F. Husted;Kenneth A. Volk

  • Design of clinical trials in acute kidney injury: report from an NIDDK workshop on trial methodology.

    Paul M. Palevsky;Bruce A. Molitoris;Mark D. Okusa;Adeera Levin

  • Cortical and Papillary Micropuncture Examination of Chloride Transport in Segments of the Rat Kidney during Inhibition of Prostaglandin Production: POSSIBLE ROLE FOR PROSTAGLANDINS IN THE CHLORURESIS OF ACUTE VOLUME EXPANSION

    Eiji Higashihara;John B. Stokes;Juha P. Kokko;William B. Campbell

  • Recruitment and Training for Home Hemodialysis: Experience and Lessons from the Nocturnal Dialysis Trial

    Mary Pipkin;Paul W. Eggers;Brett Larive;Michael V. Rocco

  • Chloride transport by the cortical and outer medullary collecting duct.

    V. L. Schuster;J. B. Stokes

  • Mice defective in Trpm6 show embryonic mortality and neural tube defects

    Roxanne Y. Walder;Baoli Yang;John B. Stokes;Patricia A. Kirby

Frequent Co-Authors

Glenn M. Chertow
Glenn M. Chertow Stanford University
Michael V. Rocco
Michael V. Rocco Wake Forest University
Tom Greene
Tom Greene University of Utah
Ravindra L. Mehta
Ravindra L. Mehta University of California, San Diego
Mark A. Knepper
Mark A. Knepper National Institutes of Health
Paul W. Eggers
Paul W. Eggers National Institutes of Health
Michael J. Welsh
Michael J. Welsh University of Iowa
B. Taylor Thompson
B. Taylor Thompson Harvard University
Bruce A. Molitoris
Bruce A. Molitoris Indiana University
Olivier Staub
Olivier Staub University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens diverse science and healthcare career options, many of which are accessible via flexible online programs. For those seeking allied health careers, roles in medical coding and billing provide strong job growth and entry pathways. Explore the medical.coder salary to learn more about compensation in this in-demand field.

The job outlook for medical billing and coding remains positive, driven by the healthcare industry’s needs for accuracy and compliance. Many students also consider pursuing Health Information Management degrees online—useful for combining science backgrounds with tech and data skills. For cost-conscious learners, review these affordable online him programs.

Nutrition is another growing area for biology graduates, with online options increasingly available for working adults. If you’re considering advanced study, look into the cheapest online nutrition degree offerings to maximize your return on investment.

Best Scientists Citing John B. Stokes

Recently Published Articles