World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
50
Citations
10439
World Ranking
5607
National Ranking
337

Jens Groth publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Groth sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 83 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jens Groth D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jens Groth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jens Groth is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom and specializes in research within the field of Computer Science. Their work includes a significant focus on subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's research spans several topics, prominently including Cryptography and Data Security, Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, Cryptographic Implementations and Security, Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption, DNA and Biological Computing, User Authentication and Security Systems, and Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting.

Jens Groth has published multiple papers in various venues. Two recent publications include:

  • Foundations of Fully Dynamic Group Signatures, 2020, Journal of Cryptology
  • Linear-Time Arguments with Sublinear Verification from Tensor Codes, 2020, Lecture notes in computer science

The frequent co-authors of Jens Groth include Victor Shoup, Jonathan Bootle, Andrea Cerulli, Pyrros Chaidos, and Essam Ghadafi.

Publishing venues where Jens Groth frequently appears include the Journal of Cryptology and Lecture notes in computer science. Their contributions mainly address core issues in security, encryption, and cryptographic protocols within computer science.

Best Publications

  • On the Size of Pairing-Based Non-interactive Arguments

    Jens Groth

  • Efficient non-interactive proof systems for bilinear groups

    Jens Groth;Amit Sahai

  • Short Pairing-Based Non-interactive Zero-Knowledge Arguments

    Jens Groth

  • Simulation-sound NIZK proofs for a practical language and constant size group signatures

    Jens Groth

  • Perfect non-interactive zero knowledge for NP

    Jens Groth;Rafail Ostrovsky;Amit Sahai

  • Structure-preserving signatures and commitments to group elements

    Masayuki Abe;Georg Fuchsbauer;Jens Groth;Kristiyan Haralambiev

  • Efficient Zero-Knowledge Arguments for Arithmetic Circuits in the Discrete Log Setting

    Jonathan Bootle;Andrea Cerulli;Pyrros Chaidos;Jens Groth

  • Group signatures: better efficiency and new theoretical aspects

    Jan Camenisch;Jens Groth

  • Fully anonymous group signatures without random oracles

    Jens Groth

  • Efficient zero-knowledge argument for correctness of a shuffle

    Stephanie Bayer;Jens Groth

  • Non-interactive zaps and new techniques for NIZK

    Jens Groth;Rafail Ostrovsky;Amit Sahai

  • One-Out-of-Many Proofs: Or How to Leak a Secret and Spend a Coin

    Jens Groth;Markulf Kohlweiss

  • Multi-query computationally-private information retrieval with constant communication rate

    Jens Groth;Aggelos Kiayias;Helger Lipmaa

  • New Techniques for Noninteractive Zero-Knowledge

    Jens Groth;Rafail Ostrovsky;Amit Sahai

  • Snarky Signatures: Minimal Signatures of Knowledge from Simulation-Extractable SNARKs

    Jens Groth;Mary Maller

  • Updatable and universal common reference strings with applications to zk-SNARKs

    Jens Groth;Markulf Kohlweiss;Markulf Kohlweiss;Mary Maller;Mary Maller;Sarah Meiklejohn

  • Non-interactive zero-knowledge arguments for voting

    Jens Groth

  • Efficient Noninteractive Proof Systems for Bilinear Groups

    Jens Groth;Amit Sahai

  • Optimal structure-preserving signatures in asymmetric bilinear groups

    Masayuki Abe;Jens Groth;Kristiyan Haralambiev;Miyako Ohkubo

  • Efficient Maximal Privacy in Boardroom Voting and Anonymous Broadcast

    Jens Groth;Jens Groth

  • A Verifiable Secret Shuffle of Homomorphic Encryptions

    Jens Groth;Jens Groth

  • Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements

    Masayuki Abe;Georg Fuchsbauer;Jens Groth;Kristiyan Haralambiev

Frequent Co-Authors

Amit Sahai
Amit Sahai University of California, Los Angeles
Masayuki Abe
Masayuki Abe Kyoto University
Rafail Ostrovsky
Rafail Ostrovsky University of California, Los Angeles
Markulf Kohlweiss
Markulf Kohlweiss University of Edinburgh
Mehdi Tibouchi
Mehdi Tibouchi NTT (Japan)
Ivan Damgård
Ivan Damgård Aarhus University
Yuval Ishai
Yuval Ishai Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Alessandro Chiesa
Alessandro Chiesa École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
George Danezis
George Danezis University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology evolves, students exploring computer science in the USA have more flexible choices than ever. Many reputable institutions now offer online courses and degrees, making it easier to balance studies, work, and personal obligations.

Students interested in broadening their expertise can consider an online bachelor's degree in physics. This foundational science complements computer science by helping you develop analytical and problem-solving skills.

For those aiming at the intersection of tech and business, pursuing the cheapest data science masters in usa is a smart way to gain in-demand skills in fields like analytics and machine learning. Likewise, engineering-minded learners may be interested in the best online electrical engineering programs USA to dive deeper into hardware, circuits, or embedded systems.

Not every career requires a lengthy or costly degree. If you’re seeking faster entry into the tech world, look into easy certifications to get online. Certifications can validate specialized skills with less time or expense, making them a practical pathway for job seekers.

Best Scientists Citing Jens Groth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles