What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Law
- Microeconomics
- Capitalism
Her primary scientific interests are in Microeconomics, Industrial organization, Research development, Diffusion and Monopoly.
Her research brings together the fields of Natural resource and Microeconomics.
Her Industrial organization research includes themes of Law enforcement, Robustness, Economic law and Revenue.
Her Diffusion research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Market structure, Process innovation, Value and Phenomenon.
Jennifer F. Reinganum combines subjects such as Industry evolution and Neoclassical economics with her study of Monopoly.
Her research investigates the connection between Neoclassical economics and topics such as Incentive that intersect with problems in Nash equilibrium.
Her most cited work include:
- THE TIMING OF INNOVATION: RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DIFFUSION (662 citations)
- Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly (659 citations)
- On the diffusion of new technology: A game theoretic approach (411 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Jennifer F. Reinganum mainly investigates Microeconomics, Settlement, Law and economics, Plaintiff and Incentive.
The Microeconomics study which covers Quality that intersects with Complete information.
The concepts of her Settlement study are interwoven with issues in Actuarial science, Information asymmetry, Confidentiality, Negotiation and Damages.
Jennifer F. Reinganum interconnects Moral hazard, Harm and Audit in the investigation of issues within Actuarial science.
The Law and economics study combines topics in areas such as Information economics, Conviction, Plea, Lawsuit and Opportunity cost.
As part of the same scientific family, Jennifer F. Reinganum usually focuses on Incentive, concentrating on Punitive damages and intersecting with Statute and Revenue.
She most often published in these fields:
- Microeconomics (38.41%)
- Settlement (27.81%)
- Law and economics (19.21%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2010-2020)?
- Law and economics (19.21%)
- Liability (14.57%)
- Private information retrieval (15.89%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Her main research concerns Law and economics, Liability, Private information retrieval, Settlement and Strict liability.
Her Law and economics study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Plea and Conviction.
Her Liability research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Industrial organization, Product and Investment.
Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Information asymmetry, Lawsuit, Plaintiff and Negotiation.
Her Strict liability study also includes fields such as
- Actuarial science that intertwine with fields like Moral hazard,
- Tort which is related to area like Payment and Damages.
Jennifer F. Reinganum is studying Signalling, which is a component of Microeconomics.
Between 2010 and 2020, her most popular works were:
- Economic analysis of products liability: Theory (23 citations)
- Informal Sanctions on Prosecutors and Defendants and the Disposition of Criminal Cases (14 citations)
- Cumulative Harm and Resilient Liability Rules for Product Markets (11 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Law
- Microeconomics
- Capitalism
Jennifer F. Reinganum focuses on Settlement, Private information retrieval, Liability, Plaintiff and Law and economics.
Her Liability research incorporates themes from Product and Investment.
Her studies deal with areas such as Industrial organization and Public economics as well as Investment.
Jennifer F. Reinganum usually deals with Plaintiff and limits it to topics linked to Loan and Information asymmetry, Tort, Incentive, Payment and Damages.
Her Information asymmetry research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Actuarial science and Harm.
She has included themes like Rules of evidence, Lawsuit, Legal process and Negotiation in her Law and economics study.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
