World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
8840
World Ranking
5556
National Ranking
2465

Jean R. Wrathall publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean R. Wrathall sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 86 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jean R. Wrathall D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean R. Wrathall sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jean R. Wrathall is affiliated with Georgetown University Medical Center in the United States. Their work is situated within the academic and medical research community at this institution.

No specific recent papers or detailed publication records are available for Jean R. Wrathall. Consequently, there is no information on titles, years of publication, or venues for their research articles.

There is also no data on frequent co-authors commonly collaborating with Wrathall or specific journals and conferences where they usually publish. Likewise, there is no record of book publications or publishers associated with their work.

Information on the main fields or subfields of study related to Wrathall's research has not been provided. Similarly, there is no available data about their principal research topics or thematic focus areas.

There is no record of any awards or recognitions received by Wrathall. The available data does confirm that the scientist is currently living.

Best Publications

  • Spinal cord contusion in the rat: Behavioral analysis of functional neurologic impairment

    Karen Gale;Harry Kerasidis;Jean R. Wrathall

  • Temporal-spatial pattern of acute neuronal and glial loss after spinal cord contusion.

    S.D. Grossman;L.J. Rosenberg;J.R. Wrathall

  • Spinal cord contusion in the rat: production of graded, reproducible, injury groups.

    Jean R. Wrathall;Jean R. Wrathall;Raleigh K. Pettegrew;Raleigh K. Pettegrew;Fenton Harvey;Fenton Harvey

  • Dose-dependent reduction of tissue loss and functional impairment after spinal cord trauma with the AMPA/kainate antagonist NBQX

    J. R. Wrathall;D. Choiniere;Yang Dong Teng

  • Spinal cord contusion in the rat: Morphometric analyses of alterations in the spinal cord

    L.J. Noble;Jean R. Wrathall

  • Cell proliferation and replacement following contusive spinal cord injury.

    Laila J. Zai;Jean R. Wrathall

  • Correlative analyses of lesion development and functional status after graded spinal cord contusive injuries in the rat.

    Linda Noble;Jean R. Wrathall

  • Neurotrophic factors in central nervous system trauma

    Italo Mocchetti;Jean R. Wrathall

  • Distribution and time course of protein extravasation in the rat spinal cord after contusive injury.

    Linda Noble;Jean R. Wrathall

  • Amelioration of functional deficits from spinal cord trauma with systemically administered NBQX, an antagonist of non-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors

    Jean R. Wrathall;Yang Dong Teng;David Choiniere

  • Increase of interleukin-1beta mRNA and protein in the spinal cord following experimental traumatic injury in the rat.

    Chen X Wang;John A Olschowka;Jean R Wrathall

  • Local Blockade of Sodium Channels by Tetrodotoxin Ameliorates Tissue Loss and Long-Term Functional Deficits Resulting from Experimental Spinal Cord Injury

    Yang Dong Teng;Jean R. Wrathall

  • Regulation of Growth by a Nerve Growth Factor-like Protein Which Modulates Paracrine Interactions between a Neoplastic Epithelial Cell Line and Stromal Cells of the Human Prostate

    Daniel Djakiew;Robert Delsite;Beth Pflug;Jean Wrathall

  • A mouse model of graded contusive spinal cord injury.

    Penelope L. Kuhn;Jean R. Wrathall

  • Basic fibroblast growth factor increases long-term survival of spinal motor neurons and improves respiratory function after experimental spinal cord injury.

    Yang Dong Teng;Italo Mocchetti;Angelo M. Taveira-DaSilva;Richard A. Gillis

  • Genetic approaches to neurotrauma research: opportunities and potential pitfalls of murine models.

    Oswald Steward;P.Elyse Schauwecker;Lloyd Guth;Ziyin Zhang

  • 2,3-Dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo(f)quinoxaline reduces glial loss and acute white matter pathology after experimental spinal cord contusion.

    Lisa J. Rosenberg;Yang D. Teng;Jean R. Wrathall

  • Glial cell loss, proliferation and replacement in the contused murine spinal cord.

    Judith M. Lytle;Jean R. Wrathall

  • Delayed antagonism of AMPA/kainate receptors reduces long-term functional deficits resulting from spinal cord trauma.

    Jean R. Wrathall;Yang Dong Teng;Robert Marriott

  • Effects of the sodium channel blocker tetrodotoxin on acute white matter pathology after experimental contusive spinal cord injury.

    Lisa J. Rosenberg;Yang D. Teng;Jean R. Wrathall

Frequent Co-Authors

Yang D. Teng
Yang D. Teng Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Barry B. Wolfe
Barry B. Wolfe Georgetown University
Linda Noble
Linda Noble University of California, San Francisco
Karen Gale
Karen Gale Georgetown University
John A. Olschowka
John A. Olschowka University of Rochester Medical Center
Ramesh Chittajallu
Ramesh Chittajallu National Institutes of Health
Harald Sontheimer
Harald Sontheimer University of Virginia
Joseph H. Neale
Joseph H. Neale Georgetown University
David L. Brody
David L. Brody Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Melitta Schachner
Melitta Schachner Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jean R. Wrathall

Recently Published Articles