| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 41 | 17755 | 4332 | 72 | 6447 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Jane M. Glick between 1967 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jane M. Glick published across 59 years, from 1967 to 2025, averaging 1.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2003. 1 of the 88 publications appeared in the last two years.
88 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1967 | 1 |
| 1968 | 0 |
| 1969 | 0 |
| 1970 | 0 |
| 1971 | 0 |
| 1972 | 2 |
| 1973 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0 |
| 1975 | 1 |
| 1976 | 1 |
| 1977 | 1 |
| 1978 | 2 |
| 1979 | 0 |
| 1980 | 1 |
| 1981 | 5 |
| 1982 | 0 |
| 1983 | 4 |
| 1984 | 1 |
| 1985 | 1 |
| 1986 | 2 |
| 1987 | 5 |
| 1988 | 3 |
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 4 |
| 1991 | 5 |
| 1992 | 5 |
| 1993 | 2 |
| 1994 | 1 |
| 1995 | 0 |
| 1996 | 3 |
| 1997 | 2 |
| 1998 | 0 |
| 1999 | 3 |
| 2000 | 8 |
| 2001 | 1 |
| 2002 | 2 |
| 2003 | 9 |
| 2004 | 4 |
| 2005 | 2 |
| 2006 | 1 |
| 2007 | 1 |
| 2008 | 0 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2010 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1 |
| 2016 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | 1 |
| Total | 88 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane M. Glick sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 72 publications — 1st percentile
1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 61–80 | 66 | 72 |
| 81–100 | 302 | |
| 101–120 | 623 | |
| 121–140 | 918 | |
| 141–160 | 1,218 | |
| 161–180 | 1,350 | |
| 181–200 | 1,344 | |
| 201–220 | 1,281 | |
| 221–240 | 1,216 | |
| 241–260 | 1,100 | |
| 261–280 | 979 | |
| 281–300 | 939 | |
| 301–320 | 764 | |
| 321–340 | 643 | |
| 341–360 | 628 | |
| 361–380 | 522 | |
| 381–400 | 459 | |
| 401–420 | 397 | |
| 421–440 | 327 | |
| 441–460 | 270 | |
| 461–480 | 265 | |
| 481–500 | 252 | |
| 501–520 | 201 | |
| 521–540 | 185 | |
| 541–560 | 148 | |
| 561–580 | 148 | |
| 581–600 | 132 | |
| 601–620 | 114 | |
| 621–640 | 104 | |
| 641–660 | 91 | |
| 661–680 | 92 | |
| 681–700 | 73 | |
| 701–720 | 57 | |
| 721–740 | 54 | |
| 741–760 | 67 | |
| 761–780 | 45 | |
| 781–800 | 46 | |
| 801–820 | 39 | |
| 821–840 | 32 | |
| 841–860 | 36 | |
| 861–880 | 29 | |
| 881–900 | 26 | |
| 901–920 | 24 | |
| 921–940 | 14 | |
| 941–960 | 23 | |
| 961–980 | 28 | |
| 981–1,000 | 15 | |
| 1,001–1,020 | 29 | |
| 1,021–1,040 | 12 | |
| 1,041–1,060 | 19 | |
| 1,061–1,080 | 12 | |
| 1,081–1,100 | 6 | |
| 1,101–1,120 | 8 | |
| 1,121–1,140 | 12 | |
| 1,141–1,160 | 5 | |
| 1,161–1,180 | 6 | |
| 1,181–1,200 | 14 | |
| 1,201–1,220 | 7 | |
| 1,221–1,240 | 2 | |
| 1,241–1,260 | 6 | |
| 1,261–1,280 | 4 | |
| 1,281–1,294 | 6 | |
| 1,295+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane M. Glick sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 41 D-Index — 2nd percentile
2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 40–41 | 289 | 41 |
| 42–43 | 612 | |
| 44–45 | 808 | |
| 46–47 | 776 | |
| 48–49 | 835 | |
| 50–51 | 861 | |
| 52–53 | 872 | |
| 54–55 | 933 | |
| 56–57 | 1,051 | |
| 58–59 | 930 | |
| 60–61 | 882 | |
| 62–63 | 834 | |
| 64–65 | 731 | |
| 66–67 | 775 | |
| 68–69 | 683 | |
| 70–71 | 646 | |
| 72–73 | 561 | |
| 74–75 | 501 | |
| 76–77 | 437 | |
| 78–79 | 388 | |
| 80–81 | 354 | |
| 82–83 | 292 | |
| 84–85 | 275 | |
| 86–87 | 254 | |
| 88–89 | 235 | |
| 90–91 | 185 | |
| 92–93 | 192 | |
| 94–95 | 155 | |
| 96–97 | 163 | |
| 98–99 | 125 | |
| 100–101 | 105 | |
| 102–103 | 105 | |
| 104–105 | 112 | |
| 106–107 | 88 | |
| 108–109 | 68 | |
| 110–111 | 69 | |
| 112–113 | 65 | |
| 114–115 | 79 | |
| 116–117 | 61 | |
| 118–119 | 44 | |
| 120–121 | 37 | |
| 122–123 | 40 | |
| 124–125 | 33 | |
| 126–127 | 26 | |
| 128–129 | 34 | |
| 130–131 | 35 | |
| 132–133 | 25 | |
| 134–135 | 27 | |
| 136–137 | 17 | |
| 138–139 | 16 | |
| 140–141 | 20 | |
| 142–143 | 20 | |
| 144–145 | 15 | |
| 146–147 | 9 | |
| 148–149 | 9 | |
| 150–151 | 16 | |
| 152–153 | 11 | |
| 154–155 | 9 | |
| 156–157 | 3 | |
| 158 | 3 | |
| 159+ | 98 |
YuZhen Zhang;Ilaria Zanotti;Muredach P. Reilly;Jane M. Glick
Karen F. Kozarsky;Mary H. Donahee;Jane M. Glick;Monty Krieger
Mary G. McCoy;Gwo-Shing Sun;Dawn Marchadier;Cyrille Maugeais
Weijun Jin;John S. Millar;Uli Broedl;Jane M. Glick
Uwe J.F. Tietge;Cyrille Maugeais;William Cain;David Grass
Hidemichi Watari;E. Joan Blanchette-Mackie;Nancy K. Dwyer;Jane M. Glick
Mark Bamberger;Jane M. Glick;George H. Rothblat
R K Tangirala;W G Jerome;N L Jones;D M Small
Weijun Jin;Gwo-Shing Sun;Dawn Marchadier;Edelyn Octtaviani
Ilia V. Fuki;Nadine Blanchard;Weijun Jin;Dawn H.L. Marchadier
Unknown
Patricia G. Yancey;Masa-aki Kawashiri;Ryan Moore;Jane M. Glick
Weijun Jin;Ilia V. Fuki;Nabil G. Seidah;Suzanne Benjannet
K Tsukamoto;P Smith;J M Glick;D J Rader
Gertrud Wolfbauer;Jane M. Glick;Lisa K. Minor;George H. Rothblat
David W. Bernard;A. Rodriguez;G. H. Rothblat;J. M. Glick
J J Klansek;P Yancey;R W St Clair;R T Fischer
C Keith;D S Feldman;S Deganello;J Glick
J M Glick;S J Adelman;M C Phillips;G H Rothblat
David W. Bernard;Annabelle Rodriguez;George H. Rothblat;Jane M. Glick
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Studying Chemistry in the USA opens various avenues for specialized careers, particularly within forensic science fields. If you're interested in practical roles, exploring how to become an autopsy technician offers insights into the educational requirements and job outlook in this critical position.
For students mindful of costs, there are options like the cheapest online forensic science degree programs, which provide accessible, flexible paths to enter forensic chemistry and analysis.
Those seeking advanced knowledge might consider pursuing an online master's degree in forensic psychology, which complements a chemistry background and enhances careers in criminal investigation and behavioral analysis.
Understanding the financial potential is just as important, so reviewing details about forensic scientist salary helps set realistic expectations and career planning goals within this growing industry.