World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
4865
World Ranking
9331
National Ranking
3940

Jane M. Bell publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane M. Bell sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jane M. Bell D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane M. Bell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jane M. Bell is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their professional work is positioned within this prominent research institution, contributing to the broader scientific community through involvement in various research activities.

While there is no available data on recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or specific fields and subfields of study, the affiliation with the National Institutes of Health suggests a strong connection to biomedical and health-related research environments.

No awards have been documented in the available information. Similarly, there are no identified main topics or specific research threads attributed to their work based on the current dataset.

Best Publications

  • One generation of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid deprivation increases depression and aggression test scores in rats.

    James C. DeMar;Kiazong Ma;Jane M. Bell;Miki Igarashi

  • α-Linolenic acid does not contribute appreciably to docosahexaenoic acid within brain phospholipids of adult rats fed a diet enriched in docosahexaenoic acid

    James C. DeMar;Kaizong Ma;Lisa Chang;Jane M. Bell

  • Half-lives of docosahexaenoic acid in rat brain phospholipids are prolonged by 15 weeks of nutritional deprivation of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids.

    James C. DeMar;Kaizong Ma;Jane M. Bell;Stanley I. Rapoport

  • Lithium decreases turnover of arachidonate in several brain phospholipids.

    Michael C.J. Chang;Eric Grange;Olivier Rabin;Jane M. Bell

  • Docosahexaenoic acid synthesis from α-linolenic acid by rat brain is unaffected by dietary n-3 PUFA deprivation

    Miki Igarashi;James C. DeMar;Kaizong Ma;Lisa Chang

  • Dietary n-3 PUFA deprivation for 15 weeks upregulates elongase and desaturase expression in rat liver but not brain.

    Miki Igarashi;Kaizong Ma;Lisa Chang;Jane M. Bell

  • Chronic valproate treatment decreases the in vivo turnover of arachidonic acid in brain phospholipids: a possible common effect of mood stabilizers

    Michael C. J. Chang;Miguel A. Contreras;Thad A. Rosenberger;Jyrki J. O. Rintala

  • Brain elongation of linoleic acid is a negligible source of the arachidonate in brain phospholipids of adult rats

    James C. DeMar;Ho-Joo Lee;Kaizong Ma;Lisa Chang

  • Chronic Lithium Chloride Administration Attenuates Brain NMDA Receptor-Initiated Signaling via Arachidonic Acid in Unanesthetized Rats

    Mireille Basselin;Lisa Chang;Jane M Bell;Stanley I Rapoport

  • Upregulated liver conversion of α-linolenic acid to docosahexaenoic acid in rats on a 15 week n-3 PUFA-deficient diet

    Miki Igarashi;James C. DeMar;Kaizong Ma;Lisa Chang

  • Intravenous injection of [1-14C]arachidonate to examine regional brain lipid metabolism in unanesthetized rats.

    J. J. DeGeorge;J. G. Noronha;J. Bell;P. Robinson

  • Dynamics of docosahexaenoic acid metabolism in the central nervous system: lack of effect of chronic lithium treatment.

    M. C. J. Chang;J. M. Bell;A. D. Purdon;E. G. Chikhale

  • Chronic carbamazepine selectively downregulates cytosolic phospholipase A2 expression and cyclooxygenase activity in rat brain.

    Sandra Ghelardoni;York A Tomita;Jane M Bell;Stanley I Rapoport

  • Analysis of gene expression with cDNA microarrays in rat brain after 7 and 42 days of oral lithium administration

    Francesca Bosetti;Ruth Seemann;Jane M Bell;Robert Zahorchak

  • Brain incorporation of [1–11C]arachidonate in normocapnic and hypercapnic monkeys, measured with positron emission tomography

    Michael C.J. Chang;Toshinari Arai;Lois M. Freed;Shinichi Wakabayashi

  • Preferential In Vivo Incorporation of [3H]Arachidonic Acid from Blood into Rat Brain Synaptosomal Fractions Before and After Cholinergic Stimulation

    Collins R. Jones;Toshanari Arai;Jane M. Bell;Stanley I. Rapoport

  • Plasma free polyunsaturated fatty acid levels are associated with symptom severity in acute mania

    M Elizabeth Sublette;Francesca Bosetti;James C DeMar;Kaizong Ma

  • Rat heart cannot synthesize docosahexaenoic acid from circulating α-linolenic acid because it lacks elongase-2

    Miki Igarashi;Kaizong Ma;Lisa Chang;Jane M. Bell

  • Microarray analysis of rat brain gene expression after chronic administration of sodium valproate.

    Francesca Bosetti;Jane M. Bell;Pachiappan Manickam

  • Low liver conversion rate of α-linolenic to docosahexaenoic acid in awake rats on a high-docosahexaenoate-containing diet

    Miki Igarashi;Kaizong Ma;Lisa Chang;Jane M. Bell

Frequent Co-Authors

Stanley I. Rapoport
Stanley I. Rapoport National Institutes of Health
Richard P. Bazinet
Richard P. Bazinet University of Toronto
James P. O'Callaghan
James P. O'Callaghan National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Robert Langenbach
Robert Langenbach National Institutes of Health
William C. Eckelman
William C. Eckelman National Institutes of Health
Dale O. Kiesewetter
Dale O. Kiesewetter National Institutes of Health
Peter Herscovitch
Peter Herscovitch National Institutes of Health
Dennis L. Murphy
Dennis L. Murphy National Institutes of Health
Deanna Greenstein
Deanna Greenstein National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in neuroscience opens the door to a variety of academic and career opportunities. For students seeking flexibility and quicker entry into the workforce, many universities now offer accelerated programs online, allowing you to earn your degree faster while accommodating your schedule.

When considering long-term prospects, reviewing the top 10 best bachelor degrees helps you align your neuroscience studies with high-demand fields. Neuroscience frequently overlaps with disciplines recognized among the most lucrative college degrees, especially in healthcare, biotechnology, and psychology.

Affordability remains a concern for many students. Fortunately, there are online schools that accept fafsa, making financial aid more accessible and helping to reduce educational costs. Carefully researching your options ensures you find a program that matches your career goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Jane M. Bell

Recently Published Articles