What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Receptor, Cell biology and Zebrafish are his primary areas of study.
His study on Internal medicine is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Molecular cloning.
Jan Bogerd performs multidisciplinary study on Endocrinology and Schistocerca in his works.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Molecular biology, Catfish and Gonadotropin-releasing hormone.
The concepts of his Cell biology study are interwoven with issues in Endocytic cycle and Endocytosis.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Estrogen, Sexual differentiation and Transactivation in addition to Zebrafish.
His most cited work include:
- Perspectives on fish gonadotropins and their receptors. (358 citations)
- Comparison of in vivo and in vitro reporter gene assays for short-term screening of estrogenic activity. (178 citations)
- Histological and Stereological Evaluation of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Spermatogenesis with an Emphasis on Spermatogonial Generations (167 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Receptor, Cell biology and Spermatogenesis.
His Internal medicine study deals with In situ hybridization intersecting with Immunocytochemistry.
His Endocrinology study typically links adjacent topics like Catfish.
His Receptor research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Peptide sequence, Signal transduction and Gonadotropin-releasing hormone.
The various areas that Jan Bogerd examines in his Cell biology study include Neuropeptide, Retinoic acid and Zebrafish.
His Spermatogenesis research focuses on FSHB and how it relates to Salmo.
He most often published in these fields:
- Internal medicine (60.87%)
- Endocrinology (60.14%)
- Receptor (30.43%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Endocrinology (60.14%)
- Internal medicine (60.87%)
- Spermatogenesis (26.81%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Endocrinology, Internal medicine, Spermatogenesis, Zebrafish and Cell biology.
He usually deals with Endocrinology and limits it to topics linked to Receptor and Pharmacology.
His Spermatogenesis study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Hormone, Androgen, Downregulation and upregulation and Growth factor.
His Zebrafish research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Leydig cell, Retinoic acid and In situ hybridization.
His research in Cell biology intersects with topics in Molecular cloning, Germline and Germ cell.
His studies in Germ cell integrate themes in fields like Protein family, Complementary DNA, Messenger RNA, Catfish and Transplantation.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Antagonistic regulation of spermatogonial differentiation in zebrafish (Danio rerio) by Igf3 and Amh (27 citations)
- Integrative testis transcriptome analysis reveals differentially expressed miRNAs and their mRNA targets during early puberty in Atlantic salmon (20 citations)
- The relaxin receptor as a therapeutic target - perspectives from evolution and drug targeting. (19 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Jan Bogerd focuses on Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Spermatogenesis, Growth factor and Germ cell.
In most of his Internal medicine studies, his work intersects topics such as Zebrafish.
He works mostly in the field of Zebrafish, limiting it down to topics relating to Somatic cell and, in certain cases, Cell biology.
His Spermatogenesis research incorporates elements of Gene expression, Androgen, Androgen insufficiency, Estrogen and Follicle-stimulating hormone.
Jan Bogerd combines subjects such as Anti-Müllerian hormone, Sertoli cell and Insulin-like growth factor with his study of Follicle-stimulating hormone.
Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Gonadotropin and Growth factor.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
