World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
4811
World Ranking
8844
National Ranking
422

Ivan Assenmacher publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan Assenmacher sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 124 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ivan Assenmacher D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan Assenmacher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ivan Assenmacher was affiliated with the University of Montpellier in France during their academic career.

As a deceased researcher, Ivan Assenmacher's profile reflects a summary of available data on their academic contributions and associations.

There are no recorded recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields or subfields of study, nor main topics of work documented in the source data for Ivan Assenmacher.

Best Publications

  • Further evidence for a central stimulatory action of catecholamines on adrenocorticotropin release in the rat.

    A. Szafarczyk;F. Malaval;A. Laurent;R. Gibaud

  • Effects of lesions of the suprachiasmatic nuclei and of p-chlorophenylalanine on the circadian rhythms of adrenocorticotrophic hormone and corticosterone in the plasma, and on locomotor activity of rats.

    A. Szafarczyk;G. Ixart;F. Malaval;J. Nouguier-Soulé

  • Temporal cascade of plasma level surges in ACTH, corticosterone, and cytokines in endotoxin-challenged rats.

    Unknown

  • Immunocytochemical evidence for stimulatory control by the ventral noradrenergic bundle of parvocellular neurons of the paraventricular nucleus secreting corticotropin releasing hormone and vasopressin in rats.

    Ge´rard Alonso;Alain Szafarczyk;Monique Balmefre´zol;Ivan Assenmacher

  • The involvement of noradrenergic ascending pathways in the stress-induced activation of ACTH and corticosterone secretions is dependent on the nature of stressors.

    S. Gaillet;J. Lachuer;F. Malaval;I. Assenmacher

  • The corticotropin-releasing factor release in rat hypophysial portal blood is mediated by brain catecholamines.

    Viviane Guillaume;Bernard Conte-Devolx;Alain Szafarczyk;Francis Malaval

  • Direct Evidence of Short-Term Cold-Induced TRH Release in the Median Eminence of Unanesthetized Rats

    Sandor Arancibia;Lucia Tapia-Arancibia;Ivan Assenmacher;Hélène Astier

  • Diurnal-stimulated and stress-induced ACTH release in rats is mediated by ventral noradrenergic bundle.

    Unknown

  • A comparative study of the annual cycles in sexual and thyroid function in male Peking ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) and teal (Anas crecca)

    Monique Jallageas;Alain Tamisier;Ivan Assenmacher

  • The endocrine control of reproduction and molt in male and female emperor (Aptenodytes forsteri) and adelie (Pygoscelis adeliae) penguins. I. Annual changes in plasma levels of gonadal steroids and LH.

    René Groscolas;Monique Jallageas;Arthur Goldsmith;Ivan Assenmacher

  • Physiology of neural pathways affecting CRH secretion.

    Ivan Assenmacher;Alain Szafarczyk;Gérard Alonso;Guy Ixart

  • Further evidence for reciprocal interactions between the annual sexual and thyroid cycles in male Peking ducks.

    Monique Jallageas;Ivan Assenmacher

  • Serotonin and the regulation of pituitary hormone secretion and of neuroendocrine rhythms.

    C Kordon;M Héry;A Szafarczyk;G Ixart

  • Evidence for basal and stress-induced release of corticotropin releasing factor in the push-pull cannulated median eminence of conscious free-moving rats.

    G. Ixart;G. Barbanel;B. Conte-Devolx;M. Grino

  • TEMPORAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE DIURNAL RHYTHM OF HYPOTHALAMIC CORTICOTROPHIN RELEASING FACTOR, PITUITARY CORTICOTROPHIN AND PLASMA CORTICOSTERONE IN THE RAT

    Guy Ixart;Alain Szafarczyk;Jean-Luc Belugou;Ivan Assenmacher

  • Radioautographic studies on the neurohypophysial projections of the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei in the rat.

    G. Alonso;I. Assenmacher

  • Testosterone secretion and plasma luteinizing hormone concentration during a sexual cycle in the Pekin duck, and after thyroxine treatment.

    Jallageas M;Assenmacher I;Follett Bk

  • Immunocytochemical identification of an LHRH-producing system originating in the preoptic nucleus of the duck

    N. Bons;B. Kerdelhué;I. Assenmacher

  • Adrenocorticotropic regulations after bilateral lesions of the paraventricular or supraoptic nuclei and in Brattleboro rats.

    G Ixart;G Alonso;A Szafarczyk;F Malaval

  • Effects of acute tilt from orthostatic to head-down antiorthostatic restraint and of sustained restraint on the intra-cerebroventricular pressure in rats.

    Daniel Maurel;Guy Ixart;Gerard Barbanel;Mourad Mekaouche

  • A subpopulation of corticotopin-releasing hormone neurosecretory cells in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus also contain NADPH-diaphorase

    P. Siaud;M. Mekaouche;G. Ixart;M. Balmefrezol

  • Chronic Restraint Enhances lnterleukin-1-Beta Release in the Basal State and after an Endotoxin Challenge, Independently of Adrenocorticotropin and Corticosterone Release

    Mourad Mekaouche;Laurent Givalois;Gérard Barbanel;Philippe Siaud

Frequent Co-Authors

Lucia Tapia-Arancibia
Lucia Tapia-Arancibia Grenoble Alpes University
Alain M. Gardier
Alain M. Gardier University of Paris-Saclay
Cindy L. Ehlers
Cindy L. Ehlers Scripps Research Institute
Jan Bogerd
Jan Bogerd Utrecht University
William R. Crowley
William R. Crowley University of Utah
Lee E. Eiden
Lee E. Eiden National Institutes of Health
Roger A. Gorski
Roger A. Gorski University of California, Los Angeles
Mike Ludwig
Mike Ludwig University of Edinburgh
Olivier Kah
Olivier Kah University of Rennes
Iain J. Clarke
Iain J. Clarke University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience opens doors to various careers in healthcare, research, education, and community services. Many students choose to advance their knowledge and employability through related online degrees that offer flexibility and affordability. For those interested in clinical or community work, an msw degree (Master of Social Work) online provides valuable training in mental health, counseling, and social services.

Students who want to focus on behavioral science can consider bcba school online to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts. This pathway is excellent for those passionate about applied behavior analysis and working with individuals with developmental or behavioral challenges.

If speed is a priority, there are 1 year msw programs online that let students fast-track their social work education. Alternatively, those seeking a broad understanding of human behavior may benefit from a fast track psychology degree online, which complements a neuroscience foundation and opens up diverse professional roles.

Best Scientists Citing Ivan Assenmacher

Recently Published Articles