World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
48
Citations
8084
World Ranking
4628
National Ranking
305

James E. Moore publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Moore sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 171 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

James E. Moore D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James E. Moore sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

James E. Moore is a researcher affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, and Immunology.

The scientist has contributed to a variety of topics within their areas of study, including:

  • Lymphatic System and Diseases
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by James E. Moore encompass a range of subjects related to biomechanics, disease pathology, and biomedical imaging technologies. These papers include:

  • High Wall Shear Stress can Predict Wall Degradation in Ascending Aortic Aneurysms: An Integrated Biomechanics Study, 2021, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  • Real-time imaging and analysis of cell-hydrogel interplay within an extrusion-bioprinting capillary, 2021, Bioprinting
  • The genetic basis of thoracic aortic disease: The future of aneurysm classification?, 2022, Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
  • Regional variation in biomechanical properties of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms, 2022, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • The Critical Importance of Spatial and Temporal Scales in Designing and Interpreting Immune Cell Migration Assays, 2021, Cells

James E. Moore frequently collaborates with other researchers, with several co-authors contributing regularly to their publications. These frequent co-authors include Jennifer Frattolin, M. Yousuf Salmasi, Sumesh Sasidharan, Thanos Athanasiou, and David C. Zawieja.

Their research has been published in various academic venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  • Bioprinting

Best Publications

  • Fluid wall shear stress measurements in a model of the human abdominal aorta: oscillatory behavior and relationship to atherosclerosis

    James E. Moore;Chengpei Xu;Seymour Glagov;Christopher K. Zarins

  • Residual strain effects on the stress field in a thick wall finite element model of the human carotid bifurcation.

    A. Delfino;N. Stergiopulos;J.E. Moore;J.-J. Meister

  • Experimental and computational flow evaluation of coronary stents.

    Joel L. Berry;Aland Santamarina;James E. Moore;Suranjan Roychowdhury

  • Lymphatic System Flows

    James E. Moore;Christopher D. Bertram

  • Experimental investigation of the distribution of residual strains in the artery wall

    S. E. Greenwald;J. E. Moore;A. Rachev;T. P. C. Kane

  • Synergistic Effects of Fluid Shear Stress and Cyclic Circumferential Stretch on Vascular Endothelial Cell Morphology and Cytoskeleton

    Shumin Zhao;Andreas Suciu;Thierry Ziegler;James E. Moore

  • Computational analysis of flow in a curved tube model of the coronary arteries: effects of time-varying curvature.

    Aland Santamarina;Erlend Weydahl;John M. Siegel;James E. Moore

  • Pulsatile Flow Visualization in the Abdominal Aorta Under Differing Physiologic Conditions: Implications for Increased Susceptibility to Atherosclerosis

    J. E. Moore;D. N. Ku;C. K. Zarins;S. Glagov

  • Biomedical Technology and Devices Handbook

    George Zouridakis;James Moore

  • Effects of Stent Design Parameters on Normal Artery Wall Mechanics

    Julian Bedoya;Clark A. Meyer;Lucas H. Timmins;Michael R. Moreno

  • Pulsatile velocity measurements in a model of the human abdominal aorta under resting conditions.

    James E. Moore;David N. Ku

  • Structural inhomogeneity and fiber orientation in the inner arterial media.

    Lucas H. Timmins;Qiaofeng Wu;Alvin T. Yeh;James E. Moore

  • Fluid and solid mechanical implications of vascular stenting.

    James E. Moore;Joel L. Berry

  • A device for subjecting vascular endothelial cells to both fluid shear stress and circumferential cyclic stretch

    James E. Moore;Ernst Bürki;Andreas Suciu;Shumin Zhao

  • Hemodynamics and wall mechanics of a compliance matching stent: in vitro and in vivo analysis.

    Joel L. Berry;Emil Manoach;Choukri Mekkaoui;Pierre H. Rolland

  • Modeling Lymph Flow and Fluid Exchange with Blood Vessels in Lymph Nodes.

    Mohammad Jafarnejad;Matthew C. Woodruff;David C. Zawieja;Michael C. Carroll

  • Increased artery wall stress post-stenting leads to greater intimal thickening.

    Lucas H Timmins;Matthew W Miller;Fred J Clubb;James E Moore

  • Dynamic curvature strongly affects wall shear rates in a coronary artery bifurcation model.

    Erlend S. Weydahl;James E. Moore

  • Hemodynamics in the abdominal aorta : a comparison of in vitro and in vivo measurements

    J. E. Moore;S. E. Maier;D. N. Ku;P. Boesiger

  • Computational Fluid Dynamics and Stent Design

    Andreas O. Frank;Peter W. Walsh;James E. Moore

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Zawieja
David C. Zawieja Texas A&M University
Adrian R. Muxworthy
Adrian R. Muxworthy Imperial College London
Gareth S. Collins
Gareth S. Collins Imperial College London
Philip A. Bland
Philip A. Bland Curtin University
Kumbakonam R. Rajagopal
Kumbakonam R. Rajagopal Texas A&M University
Christopher K. Zarins
Christopher K. Zarins Stanford University
Robert J. B. Nibbs
Robert J. B. Nibbs University of Glasgow
Thanos Athanasiou
Thanos Athanasiou Imperial College London
Hans R. Brunner
Hans R. Brunner University of Lausanne
David A. Vorp
David A. Vorp University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James E. Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles