World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
32
Citations
3983
World Ranking
3170
National Ranking
1077

James D. Baeder publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Baeder sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 114 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 61 scientists 317–326 publications: 69 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 282 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

James D. Baeder D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Baeder sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 125 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 106 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Flowfield of a Lifting Rotor in Hover: A Navier-Stokes Simulation

    G. R. Srinivasan;J. D. Baeder;S. Obayashi;W. J. McCroskey

  • TURNS - A free-wake Euler/Navier-Stokes numerical method for helicopter rotors

    G. R. Srinivasan;J. D. Baeder

  • Direct Calculation of Three-Dimensional Indicial Lift Response Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

    Rajneesh Singh;James D. Baeder

  • COMPACT RECONSTRUCTION SCHEMES WITH WEIGHTED ENO LIMITING FOR HYPERBOLIC CONSERVATION LAWS

    Debojyoti Ghosh;James D. Baeder

  • Computational Investigation of Microscale Coaxial-Rotor Aerodynamics in Hover

    Unknown

  • Indicial Aerodynamics in Compressible Flow-Direct Computational Fluid Dynamic Calculations

    Vasudev Parameswaran;James D. Baeder

  • Application of the Correlation-based Gamma-Re Theta t Transition Model to the Spalart-Allmaras Turbulence Model

    Shivaji Medida;James Baeder

  • CFD/CSD Prediction of Rotor Vibratory Loads in High-Speed Flight

    Anubhav Datta;Jayanarayanan Sitaraman;Inderjit Chopra;James D. Baeder

  • Aerodynamics of two-dimensional blade-vortex interaction

    G. R. Srinivasan;W. J. Mccroskey;J. D. Baeder

  • Implicit Hole Cutting - A New Approach to Overset Grid Connectivity

    YikLoon Lee;James Baeder

  • Computational Investigation of Small Scale Coaxial Rotor Aerodynamics in Hover

    Vinod Lakshminarayan;James Baeder

  • Field Inversion and Machine Learning With Embedded Neural Networks: Physics-Consistent Neural Network Training

    Jonathan R. Holland;James D. Baeder;Karthikeyan Duraisamy

  • Evaluation of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Determine Two-Dimensional Airfoil Characteristics for Rotorcraft Applications

    Marilyn J. Smith;Mark Potsdam;Tin-Chee Wong;James D. Baeder

  • A Computational Study of the Aeroacoustics of Rotors in Hover

    James D. Baeder;Judith M. Gallman;Yung H. Yu

  • Evaluation of a Navier-Stokes Analysis Method for Hover Performance Prediction

    Brian E. Wake;James D. Baeder

  • Field Velocity Approach and Geometric Conservation Law for Unsteady Flow Simulations

    Jayanarayanan Sitaraman;James D. Baeder

  • An Assessment of CFD/CSD Prediction State-of-the-Art Using the HART II International Workshop Data

    Marilyn Smith;Byung-Young Min;Joon Lim

  • Numerical simulation of tip vortices of wings in subsonic and transonic flows

    G. R. Srinivasan;W. J. McCroskey;J. D. Baeder;T. A. Edwards

  • High-Resolution Computational Investigation of Trimmed Coaxial Rotor Aerodynamics in Hover

    Vinod K. Lakshminarayan;James D. Baeder

  • Towards Integrated Field Inversion and Machine Learning With Embedded Neural Networks for RANS Modeling

    Jonathan R. Holland;James D. Baeder;Karthik Duraisamy

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities for students in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. For example, programs like online speech pathology offer alternative professional pathways that may appeal to individuals seeking a less traditional engineering career. When considering such options, it's helpful to review the easiest slp grad schools to get into to understand accessibility and admission requirements for these programs.

Cost is another important factor when pursuing online degrees. Understanding how much does an online speech pathology degree cost can help students budget effectively and compare expenses across different fields of study.

For veterans interested in transitioning to careers outside of engineering, there are several military friendly online speech pathology degree programs designed to accommodate their unique needs, offering flexible schedules and veteran support services.

Finally, students aiming to accelerate their education should consider accelerated speech pathology programs, which provide a faster route to entering the workforce. These programs serve as examples of how online learning options can complement and expand traditional engineering education paths.

Recently Published Articles