World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 48 4653 4479 11 11 263 7605

James B.P. Lim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James B.P. Lim between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James B.P. Lim published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 15.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2022. 29 of the 387 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2022. 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 31 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 31 publications 2021: 36 publications 2022: 39 publications 2023: 37 publications 2024: 39 publications 2025: 28 publications 2026: 1 publication
2002 2026

387 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James B.P. Lim: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 5
2003 2
2004 2
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 2
2009 2
2010 1
2011 2
2012 13
2013 13
2014 10
2015 10
2016 25
2017 20
2018 31
2019 34
2020 31
2021 36
2022 39
2023 37
2024 39
2025 28
2026 1
Total 387
Download as CSV

James B.P. Lim publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James B.P. Lim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 258–267 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 263 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240 263
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

James B.P. Lim D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James B.P. Lim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271 48
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

James B.P. Lim is affiliated with the University of Waikato in New Zealand, focusing on engineering research with a specialization in civil and structural engineering. Their research spans various subfields including building and construction, mechanics of materials, mechanical engineering, and environmental engineering.

The primary scientific contributions of James B.P. Lim revolve around the analysis of structural load-bearing capacity and behavior. Key topics of their work include:

  • Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
  • Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
  • Mechanical Stress and Fatigue Analysis
  • Fire Effects on Concrete Materials
  • Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
  • Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
  • Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics

James B.P. Lim has published extensively in renowned venues related to structural and constructional engineering. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Thin-Walled Structures
  • Structures
  • Journal of Constructional Steel Research
  • Engineering Structures
  • Journal of Building Engineering

Among their recent papers are:

  • Performance of the supply chains for New Zealand prefabricated house-building, 2020, Sustainable Cities and Society
  • Deep learning-based procedure for structural design of cold-formed steel channel sections with edge-stiffened and un-stiffened holes under axial compression, 2021, Thin-Walled Structures
  • Deep learning-based axial capacity prediction for cold-formed steel channel sections using Deep Belief Network, 2021, Structures
  • Flexural capacity of gapped built-up cold-formed steel channel sections including web stiffeners, 2020, Journal of Constructional Steel Research
  • Axial strength of back-to-back cold-formed steel channels with edge-stiffened holes, un-stiffened holes and plain webs, 2020, Journal of Constructional Steel Research

Their collaborative efforts include frequent co-authors:

  • Krishanu Roy
  • Zhiyuan Fang
  • Boshan Chen
  • G. Charles Clifton
  • Gary M. Raftery

Overall, James B.P. Lim's body of work contributes to the engineering domain through advancing knowledge in structural behavior, especially in steel channel sections and concrete materials, employing both traditional methods and deep learning techniques for structural capacity prediction and design.

Best Publications

  • Design of composite asymmetric cellular beams and beams with large web openings

    R.M. Lawson;James Lim;S.J. Hicks;W.I. Simms

  • Experimental and numerical investigation into the behaviour of face-to-face built-up cold-formed steel channel sections under compression

    Krishanu Roy;Chia Mohammadjani;James B.P. Lim

  • Ultimate strength of bolted moment-connections between cold-formed steel members

    J.B.P. Lim;D.A. Nethercot

  • Stiffness prediction for bolted moment-connections between cold-formed steel members

    J.B.P Lim;D.A Nethercot

  • Experimental and numerical investigations on the axial capacity of cold-formed steel built-up box sections

    Krishanu Roy;Tina Chui Huon Ting;Hieng Ho Lau;James B.P. Lim

  • Nonlinear behaviour of back-to-back gapped built-up cold-formed steel channel sections under compression

    Krishanu Roy;Tina Chui Huon Ting;Hieng Ho Lau;James B.P. Lim

  • Effect of thickness on the behaviour of axially loaded back-to-back cold-formed steel built-up channel sections - Experimental and numerical investigation

    Krishanu Roy;Tina Chui Huon Ting;Hieng Ho Lau;James B.P. Lim

  • Cold-Formed Steel Sections with Web Openings Subjected to Web Crippling under Two-Flange Loading Conditions — Part I : Tests and Finite Element Analysis

    Asraf Uzzaman;James B.P Lim;David Nash;Jim Rhodes

  • Web crippling behaviour of cold-formed steel channel sections with offset web holes subjected to interior-two-flange loading

    Assraf Uzzaman;James B. P. Lim;David Nash;Jim Rhodes

  • Effect of screw spacing on behavior of axially loaded back-to-back cold-formed steel built-up channel sections:

    Tina Chui Huon Ting;Krishanu Roy;Hieng Ho Lau;James Bp Lim

  • Finite element idealization of a cold-formed steel portal frame

    James B. P. Lim;David A. Nethercot

  • Assessing some durability properties of sustainable lightweight oil palm shell concrete incorporating slag and manufactured sand

    Kim Hung Mo;U. Johnson Alengaram;Mohd Zamin Jumaat;Michael Yong Jing Liu

  • Performance of the supply chains for New Zealand prefabricated house-building

    Rehan Masood;Rehan Masood;James B.P. Lim;Vicente A. González

  • Effect of offset web holes on web crippling strength of cold-formed steel channel sections under end-two-flange loading condition

    Asraf Uzzaman;James B.P. Lim;David Nash;Jim Rhodes

  • Effect of web holes on web crippling strength of cold-formed steel channel sections under end-one-flange loading condition - Part I: Tests and finite element analysis

    Ying Lian;Asraf Uzzaman;James B.P. Lim;James B.P. Lim;Gasser Abdelal

  • Deep learning-based procedure for structural design of cold-formed steel channel sections with edge-stiffened and un-stiffened holes under axial compression

    Zhiyuan Fang;Krishanu Roy;Boshan Chen;Chiu-Wing Sham

  • Cold-formed steel sections with web openings subjected to web crippling under two-flange loading conditions — Part II: Parametric study and proposed design equations

    Asraf Uzzaman;James B.P Lim;David Nash;Jim Rhodes

  • Nonlinear behavior of axially loaded back-to-back built-up cold-formed steel un-lipped channel sections

    Krishanu Roy;Tina Chui Huon Ting;Hieng Ho Lau;James B.P. Lim

  • Deep learning-based axial capacity prediction for cold-formed steel channel sections using Deep Belief Network

    Zhiyuan Fang;Krishanu Roy;Jiri Mares;Chiu-Wing Sham

  • Collapse behaviour of a fire engineering designed single-storey cold- formed steel building in severe fires

    Krishanu Roy;James B.P. Lim;Hieng Ho Lau;P.M. Yong

  • Structural performance assessment of trapezoidally-corrugated and centrally-perforated steel plate shear walls

    Milad Bahrebar;Mohammad Zaman Kabir;Tadeh Zirakian;Mohammad Hajsadeghi

Frequent Co-Authors

Krishanu Roy
Krishanu Roy University of Waikato
Ben Young
Ben Young Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Wei Sha
Wei Sha Queen's University Belfast
David A. Nethercot
David A. Nethercot Imperial College London
Iman Hajirasouliha
Iman Hajirasouliha University of Sheffield
Cecil Armstrong
Cecil Armstrong Queen's University Belfast
Jason Ingham
Jason Ingham University of Auckland
Raj Das
Raj Das RMIT University
Jian Fei Chen
Jian Fei Chen Southern University of Science and Technology
Gregory J. Hancock
Gregory J. Hancock University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens the door to a range of flexible online learning options. For those balancing family life, the best degrees for stay at home moms offer the possibility of furthering your education while managing your household.

If time is a factor, many colleges now offer 6 week certificate programs online that allow students to upskill quickly and efficiently. These rapid courses can jump-start your entry into tech careers or enhance your current credentials in a short period.

For those interested in areas overlapping with technology, such as business or finance, consider a fast track finance degree. Completing a degree at an accelerated pace can boost your employability in competitive fields.

If your career goals include leadership or management roles, pursuing one of the fastest mba programs can equip you with advanced skills in less time. These options reflect the evolving landscape of online education, catering to diverse learners and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing James B.P. Lim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles