World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ingrid C. Burke

Ingrid C. Burke

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
77
Citations
21765
World Ranking
957
National Ranking
360

Ingrid C. Burke publications per year

1985: 1 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 1 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 2 publications
1985 2026

198 publications in total across all disciplines

Ingrid C. Burke publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingrid C. Burke sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 188 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Ingrid C. Burke D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingrid C. Burke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Ingrid C. Burke is affiliated with Yale University in the United States and conducts research primarily within the field of Environmental Science. Their work extensively covers subfields such as Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Chemistry, and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law.

Their research topics focus on:

  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Ingrid C. Burke include:

  • Small effects of livestock grazing intensification on diversity, abundance, and composition in a dryland plant community (2022, Ecological Applications)
  • Allometric Modeling of Bunchgrasses in Big Sagebrush Plant Communities (2021, Rangeland Ecology & Management)
  • Understanding the effects of livestock grazing on dryland plant communities within the context of abiotic variability (2024, Ecosphere)
  • Ecosystem Structure and Function across Western Dryland Ecosystems: A Cross-Site Comparison of Semiarid Ecosystem Types in Colorado and Wyoming (2023, Western North American Naturalist)
  • Climate change and C4 and C3 grasses in a midlatitude dryland steppe (2024, Ecology and Evolution)

Burke frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Ecosphere (4 publications)
  • Ecological Applications (2 publications)
  • Rangeland Ecology & Management (1 publication)
  • Western North American Naturalist (1 publication)
  • Ecology and Evolution (1 publication)

Collaborative work is notable with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • William K. Lauenroth (12 collaborations)
  • Trace E. Martyn (3 collaborations)
  • Kyle A. Palmquist (2 collaborations)
  • Scott M. Carpenter (2 collaborations)
  • Daniel R. Schlaepfer (2 collaborations)

In 2010, Ingrid C. Burke was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Best Publications

  • Global-Scale Similarities in Nitrogen Release Patterns During Long-Term Decomposition

    William Parton;Whendee L. Silver;Ingrid C. Burke;Leo Grassens

  • The Importance of Land-Use Legacies to Ecology and Conservation

    David Foster;Frederick Swanson;John Aber;Ingrid Burke

  • Texture, climate, and cultivation effects on soil organic matter content in U.S. grassland soils

    I C Burke;C M Yonker;W J Parton;C V Cole

  • ANPP ESTIMATES FROM NDVI FOR THE CENTRAL GRASSLAND REGION OF THE UNITED STATES

    José M. Paruelo;Howard E. Epstein;William K. Lauenroth;Ingrid C. Burke

  • Simple three‐pool model accurately describes patterns of long‐term litter decomposition in diverse climates

    E. Carol Adair;William J. Parton;Steven J. Del Grosso;Whendee L. Silver

  • Carbon fluxes, nitrogen cycling, and soil microbial communities in adjacent urban, native and agricultural ecosystems

    Jason P. Kaye;Rebecca L. McCulley;Ingrid C. Burke

  • INTERACTIONS BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL PLANT SPECIES AND SOIL NUTRIENT STATUS IN SHORTGRASS STEPPE

    Mary Ann Vinton;Ingrid C. Burke

  • Ecosystem consequences of changing biodiversity

    F. Stuart Chapin;Osvaldo E. Sala;Ingrid C. Burke;J. Phillip Grime

  • Soil Organic Matter Recovery in Semiarid Grasslands: Implications for the Conservation Reserve Program

    Ingrid C. Burke;William K. Lauenroth;Debra P. Coffin

  • REGIONAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATION IN NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND NITROGEN MINERALIZATION IN GRASSLANDS

    Ingrid C. Burke;William K. Lauenroth;William J. Parton

  • Grassland Precipitation-Use Efficiency Varies Across a Resource Gradient

    José M. Paruelo;William K. Lauenroth;Ingrid C. Burke;Osvaldo E. Sala

  • Biogeochemistry in a shortgrass landscape: control by topography, soil texture, and microclimate.

    Paul B. Hook;Ingrid C. Burke

  • Heterogeneity of soil and plant N and C associated with individual plants and openings in North American shortgrass steppe

    Paul B. Hook;Ingrid C. Burke;William K. Lauenroth

  • Plant-Soil interactions in temperate grasslands

    Ingrid C. Burke;William K. Lauenroth;Mary Ann Vinton;Paul B. Hook

  • Livestock Grazing: Animal and Plant Biodiversity of Shortgrass Steppe and the Relationship to Ecosystem Function

    D.G. Milchunas;W.K. Lauenroth;I.C. Burke

  • Estimating stand structure using discrete-return lidar: an example from low density, fire prone ponderosa pine forests

    S. A. Hall;I.C. Burke;D. O. Box;M. R. Kaufmann

  • Regional Analysis of the Central Great Plains

    I. C. Burke;T. G. F. Kittel;W. K. Lauenroth;P. Snook

  • PRODUCTIVITY PATTERNS OF C3 AND C4 FUNCTIONAL TYPES IN THE U.S. GREAT PLAINS

    H. E. Epstein;W. K. Lauenroth;I. C. Burke;D. P. Coffin

  • Spatial Variability of Soil Properties in the Shortgrass Steppe: The Relative Importance of Topography, Grazing, Microsite, and Plant Species in Controlling Spatial Patterns

    Ingrid C. Burke;William K. Lauenroth;Rebecca Riggle;Peter Brannen

  • Long-term patterns of mass loss during the decomposition of leaf and fine root litter: an intersite comparison

    Mark E. Harmon;Whendee L. Silver;Becky Fasth;Hua Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

William K. Lauenroth
William K. Lauenroth Yale University
William J. Parton
William J. Parton Colorado State University
José M. Paruelo
José M. Paruelo University of Buenos Aires
Rebecca L. McCulley
Rebecca L. McCulley University of Kentucky
John B. Bradford
John B. Bradford United States Geological Survey
Daniel G. Milchunas
Daniel G. Milchunas Colorado State University
Arvin R. Mosier
Arvin R. Mosier University of Melbourne
Osvaldo E. Sala
Osvaldo E. Sala Arizona State University
John E. Barrett
John E. Barrett Virginia Tech
Mark E. Harmon
Mark E. Harmon Oregon State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Looking to broaden your career prospects with an online degree related to Ecology and Evolution? Several interdisciplinary pathways are available that connect well to environmental research and education. If teaching or educational outreach interests you, consider exploring the most affordable online master's in education. This path is ideal for aspiring educators in biology, science history, or environmental studies.

For those drawn to organizing and sharing scientific information, a library science degree online offers training in research management, digital archiving, and public access to scientific knowledge. This expertise is valuable in museums, research institutions, and academic libraries focusing on environmental sciences.

Communication is key in ecology outreach. If you're interested in health and communication sciences, look into asha approved slp programs. Speech-language pathologists play vital roles in community and educational settings, supporting communication—an essential skill for environmental educators.

If you lack an SLP background but want to pivot to this field, slp bridge program options are available online, making transition smooth for non-SLP majors. Each of these online degrees can open doors to diverse careers at the intersection of science, communication, and education.

Best Scientists Citing Ingrid C. Burke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles