World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Houssem Haddar

Houssem Haddar

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mathematics 37 2530 2251 150 141 171 5068

Houssem Haddar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Houssem Haddar between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Houssem Haddar published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2010. 8 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2010. 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 2 publications
1998 2025

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Houssem Haddar: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 2
1999 0
2000 2
2001 2
2002 9
2003 10
2004 3
2005 6
2006 8
2007 6
2008 2
2009 7
2010 21
2011 14
2012 9
2013 9
2014 14
2015 12
2016 13
2017 11
2018 5
2019 6
2020 8
2021 6
2022 8
2023 8
2024 6
2025 2
Total 209
Download as CSV

Houssem Haddar publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Houssem Haddar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 537+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 112. Most scientists, 112, have 142–146 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 167–171 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientist 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientist 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientist 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42–46 publications 537+

This scientist: 171 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 3
47–51 5
52–56 7
57–61 20
62–66 14
67–71 25
72–76 19
77–81 35
82–86 50
87–91 60
92–96 86
97–101 84
102–106 83
107–111 90
112–116 99
117–121 90
122–126 91
127–131 109
132–136 110
137–141 98
142–146 112
147–151 102
152–156 88
157–161 106
162–166 83
167–171 102 171
172–176 77
177–181 81
182–186 78
187–191 71
192–196 92
197–201 64
202–206 69
207–211 64
212–216 62
217–221 58
222–226 53
227–231 50
232–236 46
237–241 46
242–246 46
247–251 43
252–256 29
257–261 45
262–266 30
267–271 33
272–276 34
277–281 30
282–286 31
287–291 21
292–296 34
297–301 26
302–306 10
307–311 17
312–316 23
317–321 13
322–326 16
327–331 26
332–336 13
337–341 13
342–346 16
347–351 17
352–356 12
357–361 18
362–366 18
367–371 9
372–376 11
377–381 8
382–386 8
387–391 9
392–396 9
397–401 8
402–406 11
407–411 6
412–416 6
417–421 9
422–426 8
427–431 5
432–436 8
437–441 8
442–446 4
447–451 4
452–456 4
457–461 2
462–466 2
467–471 4
472–476 3
477–481 3
482–486 6
487–491 3
492–496 5
497–501 5
502–506 1
507–511 6
512–516 4
517–521 1
522–526 3
527–531 1
532–536 4
537+ 100
Download as CSV

Houssem Haddar D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Houssem Haddar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 86+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 174. Most scientists, 174, have 30 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 174
31 151
32 174
33 117
34 136
35 127
36 145
37 153 37
38 150
39 150
40 138
41 136
42 93
43 108
44 115
45 112
46 103
47 75
48 59
49 67
50 60
51 57
52 59
53 62
54 60
55 50
56 42
57 54
58 50
59 42
60 41
61 35
62 40
63 21
64 31
65 27
66 29
67 19
68 25
69 17
70 18
71 12
72 14
73 13
74 18
75 9
76 11
77 10
78 9
79 16
80 12
81 10
82 5
83 5
84 13
85 6
86+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Houssem Haddar is affiliated with École Polytechnique in France and has contributed extensively to the fields of Engineering and Mathematics. Their research focuses particularly on topics including numerical methods in inverse problems, microwave imaging and scattering analysis, geophysical methods and applications, ultrasonics and acoustic wave propagation, advanced mathematical modeling in engineering, electromagnetic scattering and analysis, and seismic imaging and inversion techniques.

Haddar's publication record includes numerous articles across prominent venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Inverse Problems
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • Inverse Problems and Imaging

Several recent papers illustrate the range and focus of their work:

  • "Qualitative indicator functions for imaging crack networks using acoustic waves," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "A duality between scattering poles and transmission eigenvalues in scattering theory," 2020, Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • "Transmission Eigenvalues," 2021, Notices of the American Mathematical Society
  • "An Accelerated Level-Set Method for Inverse Scattering Problems," 2022, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences
  • "Data completion method for the Helmholtz equation via surface potentials for partial Cauchy data," 2020, Inverse Problems

Among book publications, Haddar has contributed to the volume titled Inverse Scattering Theory and Transmission Eigenvalues, Second Edition, published in 2022 by the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

Coauthor collaborations have been an integral part of their research output. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Fioralba Cakoni
  • Lorenzo Audibert
  • Fatemeh Pourahmadian
  • David Colton
  • Lucas Chesnel

The subfields of study that characterize Haddar's work include mathematical physics, biomedical engineering, ocean engineering, geophysics, and mechanics of materials, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach within engineering and applied mathematics.

Best Publications

  • The linear sampling method in inverse electromagnetic scattering theory

    David Colton;Houssem Haddar;Michele Piana

  • The Existence of an Infinite Discrete Set of Transmission Eigenvalues

    Fioralba Cakoni;Drossos Gintides;Houssem Haddar

  • Inverse scattering theory and transmission eigenvalues

    Fioralba Cakoni;David Colton;Houssem Haddar

  • On the determination of Dirichlet or transmission eigenvalues from far field data

    Fioralba Cakoni;David Colton;Houssem Haddar

  • Transmission Eigenvalues in Inverse Scattering Theory

    Fioralba Cakoni;Houssem Haddar

  • On the existence of transmission eigenvalues in an inhomogeneous medium

    Fioralba Cakoni;Houssem Haddar

  • An application of the reciprocity gap functional to inverse scattering theory

    David Colton;Houssem Haddar

  • The linear sampling method for anisotropic media

    Fioralba Cakoni;David Colton;Houssem Haddar

  • The Linear Sampling Method for Solving the Electromagnetic Inverse Scattering Problem

    David Colton;Houssem Haddar;Peter Monk

  • GENERALIZED IMPEDANCE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR SCATTERING BY STRONGLY ABSORBING OBSTACLES: THE SCALAR CASE

    Houssem Haddar;Patrick Joly;Hoai Minh Nguyen

  • Analysis of two linear sampling methods applied to electromagnetic imaging of buried objects

    Fioralba Cakoni;M'Barek Fares;Houssem Haddar

  • A generalized formulation of the linear sampling method with exact characterization of targets in terms of farfield measurements

    Lorenzo Audibert;Houssem Haddar

  • The interior transmission problem for anisotropic Maxwell's equations and its applications to the inverse problem

    Houssem Haddar

  • The linear sampling method for solving the electromagnetic inverse medium problem

    Houssem Haddar;Peter Monk

  • GENERALIZED IMPEDANCE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR SCATTERING PROBLEMS FROM STRONGLY ABSORBING OBSTACLES: THE CASE OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS

    Houssem Haddar;Patrick Joly;Hoai-Minh Nguyen

  • A sampling method for inverse scattering in the time domain

    Qiang Chen;Houssem Haddar;Armin Lechleiter;Peter Monk

  • Stability of thin layer approximation of electromagnetic waves scattering by linear and nonlinear coatings

    H. Haddar;P. Joly

  • A variational approach for the solution of the electromagnetic interior transmission problem for anisotropic media

    Fioralba Cakoni;Houssem Haddar

  • The interior transmission problem for regions with cavities

    Fioralba Cakoni;David Colton;Houssem Haddar

  • On the use of T-coercivity to study the interior transmission eigenvalue problem

    Anne-Sophie Bonnet-Ben Dhia;Lucas Chesnel;Houssem Haddar

  • Approximate models for wave propagation across thin periodic interfaces

    Bérangère Delourme;Houssem Haddar;Patrick Joly

Frequent Co-Authors

Fioralba Cakoni
Fioralba Cakoni Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Patrick Joly
Patrick Joly École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées
David Colton
David Colton University of Delaware
Rainer Kress
Rainer Kress University of Göttingen
Peter Monk
Peter Monk University of Delaware
Patrick Ciarlet
Patrick Ciarlet École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées
Jan S. Hesthaven
Jan S. Hesthaven Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Ralf Hiptmair
Ralf Hiptmair ETH Zurich
Andreas Kirsch
Andreas Kirsch Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Denis Le Bihan
Denis Le Bihan University of Paris-Saclay

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, expanding into related online degrees can enhance career prospects. Combining mathematical skills with business knowledge, many consider enrolling in mba programs that accept transfer credits. These programs offer flexibility for students transferring credits from their math undergraduate studies, making the pathway smoother and faster.

Similarly, the demand for expertise in data interpretation has made an ms in data analytics a natural progression for math graduates. This degree bridges quantitative skills with practical applications in industries like finance, healthcare, and technology.

For those seeking quicker access to leadership roles, various mba programs easy to get into provide an alternative path. These programs often have more flexible admission criteria without compromising education quality.

Additionally, candidates pressed for time should explore easiest and fastest online mba programs. These degrees offer accelerated completion options, ideal for professionals balancing work and study.

Best Scientists Citing Houssem Haddar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles