World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
36
Citations
6596
World Ranking
2489
National Ranking
11

Hans Nørgaard Hansen publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Nørgaard Hansen sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 381 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Hans Nørgaard Hansen D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Nørgaard Hansen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Size effects in manufacturing of metallic components

    F. Vollertsen;D. Biermann;H.N. Hansen;I.S. Jawahir

  • Dimensional micro and nano metrology

    Unknown

  • Bio-inspired functional surfaces for advanced applications

    Ajay Malshe;Kamlakar Rajurkar;Anoop Samant;Hans Nørgaard Hansen

  • Grasping devices and methods in automated production processes

    Gualtiero Fantoni;Marco Santochi;Gino Dini;Kirsten Tracht

  • Modelling the cutting edge radius size effect for force prediction in micro milling

    Unknown

  • Quantitative Characterisation of Surface Texture

    Unknown

  • Micromilling of hardened tool steel for mould making applications

    Unknown

  • Replication of micro and nano surface geometries

    Unknown

  • Multiscale analyses and characterizations of surface topographies

    Christopher A. Brown;Hans N. Hansen;Xiang Jane Jiang;François Blateyron

  • Size Effects on Surface Generation in Micro Milling of Hardened Tool Steel

    Unknown

  • Nanomanufacturing—Perspective and applications

    F. Z. Fang;F. Z. Fang;X. D. Zhang;W.W. Gao;Y. B. Guo

  • State-of-the-art of fiber-reinforced polymers in additive manufacturing technologies

    Unknown

  • Residual stress in Ni–W electrodeposits

    Io Mizushima;Peter Torben Tang;Hans Nørgaard Hansen;Marcel A. J. Somers

  • Surface microstructure replication in injection molding

    Unknown

  • Strength analysis and modeling of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting for tooling applications

    Unknown

  • Estimation of measurement uncertainties in X-ray computed tomography metrology using the substitution method

    Unknown

  • Cutting force model and damage formation mechanism in milling of 70wt% Si/Al composite

    Unknown

  • Towards the effective tool wear control in micro-EDM milling

    Unknown

  • Feasibility of wear compensation in micro EDM milling based on discharge counting and discharge population characterization

    Unknown

  • Process chains for the manufacturing of molded interconnect devices.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Leonardo De Chiffre
Leonardo De Chiffre Technical University of Denmark
Jesper Henri Hattel
Jesper Henri Hattel Technical University of Denmark
Stefan Simeonov Dimov
Stefan Simeonov Dimov University of Birmingham
Marcel A. J. Somers
Marcel A. J. Somers Technical University of Denmark
Fengzhou Fang
Fengzhou Fang University College Dublin
Richard Leach
Richard Leach University of Nottingham
Yuebin Guo
Yuebin Guo Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Yee Cheong Lam
Yee Cheong Lam Nanyang Technological University
Frank Vollertsen
Frank Vollertsen Bremen Institute for Applied Beam Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring pathways related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering often leads students to consider complementary fields and online education options. Understanding how competitive these programs are can help set realistic goals. For example, students curious about how competitive other specialized disciplines can be may find the discussion on how hard is it to get into slp grad school insightful, highlighting admission challenges in a different but equally demanding area.

For those seeking more accessible entry routes, resources such as the easiest slp masters to get into provide guidance on programs with higher acceptance rates, which can be motivating when considering online degree options in related fields.

Cost is an essential factor in choosing an online degree. The detailed overview of the cost of online speech pathology degree programs offers valuable insights on budgeting for online education, applicable to mechanical or aerospace students considering additional qualifications or certifications.

Moreover, tailored online programs support specific groups such as veterans. The article on speech pathology programs online for veterans illustrates how flexible, veteran-friendly options can be a model for engineering-related degrees, promoting accessibility and career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Hans Nørgaard Hansen

Recently Published Articles