World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 47 4779 4598 146 140 381 10404

Günter Steinmeyer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Günter Steinmeyer between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Günter Steinmeyer published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 13.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2014. 16 of the 437 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2014. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 32 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 9 publications
1993 2025

437 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Günter Steinmeyer: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 2
1995 1
1996 5
1997 5
1998 4
1999 7
2000 14
2001 13
2002 6
2003 8
2004 11
2005 15
2006 24
2007 13
2008 13
2009 28
2010 23
2011 20
2012 19
2013 27
2014 32
2015 10
2016 18
2017 16
2018 16
2019 25
2020 16
2021 13
2022 6
2023 9
2024 7
2025 9
Total 437
Download as CSV

Günter Steinmeyer publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günter Steinmeyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 378–387 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 381 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97 381
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Günter Steinmeyer D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günter Steinmeyer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306 47
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For outstanding contributions to ultrafast nonlinear optics, in particular for the development of pulse characterization techniques, the experimental demonstration of pulse selfcompression through laser filamentation, and the investigations of higherorder nonlinear susceptibilities and rogue waves
  • 2016 - OSA Fellows Günter Steinmeyer Max Born Institute, Germany For significant contributions to femtosecond pulse measurements and stabilization of the carrier-envelope phase, in particular the feed-forward stabilization method using an acousto-optic frequency shifter.

Overview

Günter Steinmeyer is affiliated with Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of Physics and Astronomy as well as Engineering. Their research primarily focuses on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, alongside notable work in Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The scientist's main topics of research include:

  • Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies
  • Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics
  • Solid State Laser Technologies
  • Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
  • Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Optical Network Technologies

Günter Steinmeyer has published multiple recent papers, demonstrating ongoing engagement with laser physics and optical research. Selected recent publications include:

  • Highly reliable measurement of ultrashort laser pulses (2020), Journal of Applied Physics
  • All-optical supercontinuum switching (2020), Communications Physics
  • Spontaneous emission noise in mode-locked lasers and frequency combs (2020), Physical review. A/Physical review, A
  • Space-time focusing and coherence properties of supercontinua in multipass cells (2021), Physical Review Research
  • Spatial cage solitons-taming light bullets (2021), Photonics Research

Their frequent co-authors reflect collaborative work within the optics and laser community and include:

  • Chao Mei
  • Esmerando Escoto
  • И. Бабушкин
  • Ayhan Demircan
  • Uwe Griebner

Steinmeyer's publications often appear in specialized venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics
  • Physical review. A/Physical review, A
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Optics Express
  • Optics Letters

Their research output spans across multiple dimensions of ultrafast nonlinear optics, laser pulse characterization, and nonlinear optical phenomena.

Recognition for their work includes awards such as:

  • Fellow of American Physical Society (APS), 2017, awarded for contributions to ultrafast nonlinear optics, pulse characterization techniques, pulse self-compression, and investigations of nonlinear susceptibilities and rogue waves
  • OSA Fellow, 2016, acknowledged for significant progress in femtosecond pulse measurements and carrier-envelope phase stabilization involving feed-forward methods using an acousto-optic frequency shifter

Best Publications

  • Photonic-bandgap microcavities in optical waveguides

    J. S. Foresi;P. R. Villeneuve;J. Ferrera;E. R. Thoen

  • Carrier-envelope offset phase control: A novel concept for absolute optical frequency measurement and ultrashort pulse generation

    H.R. Telle;G. Steinmeyer;A.E. Dunlop;J. Stenger

  • Ultra-compact Si-SiO 2 microring resonator optical channel dropping filters

    B.E. Little;J.S. Foresi;G. Steinmeyer;E.R. Thoen

  • Semiconductor saturable-absorber mirror assisted Kerr-lens mode-locked Ti:sapphire laser producing pulses in the two-cycle regime.

    Dirk H. Sutter;G. Steinmeyer;L. Gallmann;N. Matuschek

  • Roadmap on optical rogue waves and extreme events

    Nail Akhmediev;Bertrand Kibler;Fabio Baronio;Milivoj Belic

  • Characterization of sub-6-fs optical pulses with spectral phase interferometry for direct electric-field reconstruction.

    L. Gallmann;D. H. Sutter;N. Matuschek;G. Steinmeyer

  • Self-compression of millijoule pulses to 7.8 fs duration in a white-light filament.

    Gero Stibenz;Nickolai Zhavoronkov;Günter Steinmeyer

  • Femtosecond light transmission and subradiant damping in plasmonic crystals.

    C. Ropers;D. J. Park;G. Stibenz;G. Steinmeyer

  • Direct frequency comb synthesis with arbitrary offset and shot-noise-limited phase noise

    Sebastian Koke;Christian Grebing;Harald Frei;Alexandria Anderson

  • Controlling light by light with an optical event horizon.

    A. Demircan;S.-H. Amiranashvili;G. Steinmeyer

  • Self-compression by femtosecond pulse filamentation: experiments versus numerical simulations.

    Stefan Skupin;Gero Stibenz;Luc Bergé;Falk Lederer

  • Passive mode-locking of a Tm-doped bulk laser near 2 microm using a carbon nanotube saturable absorber.

    Won Bae Cho;Andreas Schmidt;Jong Hyuk Yim;Sun Young Choi

  • Passive mode locking of Yb:KLuW using a single-walled carbon nanotube saturable absorber

    Andreas Schmidt;Simon Rivier;Guenter Steinmeyer;Jong Hyuk Yim

  • Boosting the Non Linear Optical Response of Carbon Nanotube Saturable Absorbers for Broadband Mode-Locking of Bulk Lasers

    W. B. Cho;J. H. Yim;S. Y. Choi;S. Lee

  • Few-Femtosecond Plasmon Dephasing of a Single Metallic Nanostructure from Optical Response Function Reconstruction by Interferometric Frequency Resolved Optical Gating

    Alexandria Anderson;Kseniya S. Deryckx;Xiaoji G. Xu;Günter Steinmeyer

  • Pulse compression over a 170-THz bandwidth in the visible by use of only chirped mirrors

    M. Zavelani-Rossi;G. Cerullo;S. De Silvestri;L. Gallmann

  • Back-side-coated chirped mirrors with ultra-smooth broadband dispersion characteristics

    N. Matuschek;L. Gallmann;D.H. Sutter;G. Steinmeyer

  • Saturation of the All-Optical Kerr Effect

    Carsten Brée;Ayhan Demircan;Günter Steinmeyer

  • Fabrication and characterization of ultrafast carbon nanotube saturable absorbers for solid-state laser mode locking near 1μm

    Jong Hyuk Yim;Won Bae Cho;Soonil Lee;Yeong Hwan Ahn

  • Techniques for the characterization of sub-10-fs optical pulses: a comparison

    L. Gallmann;D.H. Sutter;N. Matuschek;G. Steinmeyer

  • Spatiotemporal rogue events in optical multiple filamentation.

    Simon Birkholz;Erik T. J. Nibbering;Carsten Brée;Stefan Skupin

  • Coherent artifact in modern pulse measurements.

    Justin Ratner;Günter Steinmeyer;Tsz Chun Wong;Randy Bartels

  • Spatially resolved amplitude and phase characterization of femtosecond optical pulses.

    L. Gallmann;G. Steinmeyer;D. H. Sutter;T. Rupp

  • Predictability of rogue events.

    Simon Birkholz;Carsten Brée;Ayhan Demircan;Günter Steinmeyer

  • Rogue events in the group velocity horizon

    Ayhan Demircan;Shalva Amiranashvili;Carsten Brée;Christoph Mahnke

  • Carrier-envelope offset dynamics of mode-locked lasers

    F. W. Helbing;G. Steinmeyer;U. Keller;R. S. Windeler

  • Sub-10 fs pulse characterization using spatially encoded arrangement for spectral phase interferometry for direct electric field reconstruction

    Adam S. Wyatt;Ian A. Walmsley;Gero Stibenz;Günter Steinmeyer

  • Method for Computing the Nonlinear Refractive Index via Keldysh Theory

    C. Bree;A. Demircan;G. Steinmeyer

  • The coherent artifact in modern pulse measurements

    Justin Ratner;Günter Steinmeyer;Tsz Chun Wong;Randy Bartels

Frequent Co-Authors

Uwe Griebner
Uwe Griebner Max-Born-Institute for Nonlinear Optics and Short Pulse Spectroscopy
Ursula Keller
Ursula Keller ETH Zurich
Rick Trebino
Rick Trebino Georgia Institute of Technology
Mircea Guina
Mircea Guina Tampere University
Fabian Rotermund
Fabian Rotermund Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Soonil Lee
Soonil Lee Ajou University
Goëry Genty
Goëry Genty Tampere University
Thomas Elsaesser
Thomas Elsaesser Max Planck Society
Markus B. Raschke
Markus B. Raschke University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens the door to diverse online degrees and career pathways. For students interested in managing complex projects, an online project management degree provides a solid foundation in leadership and organizational skills. Real estate is another promising field. By pursuing a real estate degree online, students can combine technical know-how with business strategies for a dynamic career.

User experience is a growing sector in tech. An online ux design degree equips learners with the necessary tools to create intuitive interfaces and enhance digital products. For those curious about earning potential, a project management degree salary can range widely based on experience and industry, but the field is known for competitive compensation.

These online programs offer flexibility and affordability, making them attractive options for students who wish to advance their education and career from anywhere in the world.

Best Scientists Citing Günter Steinmeyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles