World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Guillaume Lavoué

Guillaume Lavoué

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
4545
World Ranking
13584
National Ranking
360

Guillaume Lavoué publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guillaume Lavoué sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 156 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Guillaume Lavoué D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guillaume Lavoué sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guillaume Lavoué is affiliated with École Centrale de Lyon in France and specializes in research at the intersection of computer science and engineering. Their work predominantly explores areas within computer vision, computer graphics, and computational mechanics, contributing to a range of topics related to 3D modeling, image quality assessment, and visualization techniques.

The main fields of study for Lavoué include:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

More specifically, their subfields of study cover:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

The key research topics Lavoué has addressed encompass:

  • Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Color Science and Applications
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

Guillaume Lavoué's scholarly output includes numerous recent papers published in notable venues. Selected publications demonstrate their engagement with subjective and objective evaluation methods, deep learning applications, and quality metrics in 3D and virtual reality contexts:

  • "Visual Quality of 3D Meshes With Diffuse Colors in Virtual Reality: Subjective and Objective Evaluation" (2020), IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "Textured Mesh Quality Assessment: Large-scale Dataset and Deep Learning-based Quality Metric" (2023), ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • "Comparison of Subjective Methods for Quality Assessment of 3D Graphics in Virtual Reality" (2020), ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
  • "Perceptual quality of BRDF approximations: dataset and metrics" (2021), Computer Graphics Forum
  • "Representation learning of 3D meshes using an Autoencoder in the spectral domain" (2022), Computers & Graphics

The venues where Lavoué frequently publishes include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computers & Graphics
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • ACM Transactions on Applied Perception

Among their frequent coauthors are:

  • Florent Dupont
  • Yana Nehmé
  • Patrick Le Callet
  • Jean-Philippe Farrugia
  • Pierre Raimbaud

Best Publications

  • A new CAD mesh segmentation method, based on curvature tensor analysis

    Guillaume Lavoué;Florent Dupont;Atilla Baskurt

  • 3D Mesh Compression: Survey, Comparisons, and Emerging Trends

    Adrien Maglo;Guillaume Lavoué;Florent Dupont;Céline Hudelot

  • A comparison of methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval

    Zhouhui Lian;Afzal Godil;Benjamin Bustos;Mohamed Daoudi

  • PCQM: A Full-Reference Quality Metric for Colored 3D Point Clouds

    Gabriel Meynet;Yana Nehme;Julie Digne;Guillaume Lavoue

  • A Multiscale Metric for 3D Mesh Visual Quality Assessment

    Guillaume Lavoué

  • Perceptually driven 3D distance metrics with application to watermarking

    Guillaume Lavoué;Elisa Drelie Gelasca;Florent Dupont;Atilla Baskurt

  • A Comprehensive Survey on Three-Dimensional Mesh Watermarking

    Kai Wang;G. Lavoue;F. Denis;A. Baskurt

  • SHREC'11 track: shape retrieval on non-rigid 3D watertight meshes

    Z. Lian;A. Godil;B. Bustos;M. Daoudi

  • Perceptual metrics for static and dynamic triangle meshes

    Massimiliano Corsini;Mohamed-Chaker Larabi;Guillaume Lavoué;Oldrich Petrík

  • Efficient Decomposition of Image and Mesh Graphs by Lifted Multicuts

    M. Keuper;E. Levinkov;N. Bonneel;G. Lavoue

  • A local roughness measure for 3D meshes and its application to visual masking

    Guillaume Lavoué

  • Combination of bag-of-words descriptors for robust partial shape retrieval

    Guillaume Lavoué

  • Improving Zernike Moments Comparison for Optimal Similarity and Rotation Angle Retrieval

    J. Revaud;G. Lavoue;A. Baskurt

  • Factors to Consider for Tailored Gamification

    Stuart Hallifax;Audrey Serna;Jean-Charles Marty;Guillaume Lavoué

  • A Comparison of Perceptually-Based Metrics for Objective Evaluation of Geometry Processing

    Guillaume Lavoué;Massimiliano Corsini

  • Learning Boundary Edges for 3D-Mesh Segmentation

    Halim Benhabiles;Guillaume Lavoué;Jean-Philippe Vandeborre;Mohamed Daoudi

  • Technical Section: Robust and blind mesh watermarking based on volume moments

    Kai Wang;Guillaume Lavoué;Florence Denis;Atilla Baskurt

  • PC-MSDM: A quality metric for 3D point clouds

    Gabriel Meynet;Julie Digne;Guillaume Lavoue

  • A Benchmark for 3D Mesh Watermarking

    Kai Wang;Guillaume Lavoué;Florence Denis;Atilla Baskurt

  • Streaming compressed 3D data on the web using JavaScript and WebGL

    Guillaume Lavoué;Laurent Chevalier;Florent Dupont

  • Bag of words and local spectral descriptor for 3D partial shape retrieval

    Guillaume Lavoué

Frequent Co-Authors

Mohamed Daoudi
Mohamed Daoudi IMT Nord Europe
Christian Wolf
Christian Wolf Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon
Anup Basu
Anup Basu University of Alberta
Martin Reuter
Martin Reuter University of Bonn
Ioannis Pratikakis
Ioannis Pratikakis Democritus University of Thrace
Thomas Brox
Thomas Brox University of Freiburg
Fatih Porikli
Fatih Porikli Australian National University
Remco C. Veltkamp
Remco C. Veltkamp Utrecht University
Ryutarou Ohbuchi
Ryutarou Ohbuchi University of Yamanashi

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science often opens doors to numerous related fields and online learning opportunities. For students focused on affordability, several schools in the USA now offer the cheapest master in data science programs. These options balance quality with cost, making advanced study more accessible.

If you’re interested in expanding your technical skill set, consider pursuing an engineering path. Rankings for the online electrical engineering degree ranking highlight the top programs available for remote study. These degrees can complement a background in computer science and increase your career prospects.

Want to boost your resume quickly? You may want to check out easy certifications to get online that offer strong earning potential with minimal time investment. These certifications can be a fast track for career growth or specialization.

Finally, for those needing flexibility or an accelerated learning path, the quickest cheapest masters degree programs can make career advancement more attainable. These programs are designed for those who want to fast-track their education without breaking the bank.

Best Scientists Citing Guillaume Lavoué

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles