World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
6406
World Ranking
9280
National Ranking
3918

G.H. Jones publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G.H. Jones sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 44 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

G.H. Jones D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G.H. Jones sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

G.H. Jones is affiliated with Emory University in the United States. Their research contributions span various areas connected primarily to nuclear and high energy physics, as well as materials chemistry and biomedical engineering.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of topics related to fusion research and materials science. Notable papers in their record include:

  • Isotope removal experiment in JET-ILW in view of T-removal after the 2nd DT campaign at JET (2022), published in Physica Scripta
  • Remote wide angle view broad wavelength viewing system compatible with D-T operations in JET (2023), published in Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
  • JET CODAS - the final status (2024), published in Fusion Engineering and Design
  • 23rd August: 12th Sunday after Pentecost (2020), published in The Expository Times
  • 20th June: 4th Sunday after Pentecost (2021), published in The Expository Times

The publication venues where this scientist frequently appears include:

  • The Expository Times
  • Physica Scripta
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
  • Fusion Engineering and Design
  • University Library Heidelberg

G.H. Jones has collaborated often with several researchers, with frequent co-authors including:

  • A. Huber
  • S. Silburn
  • P. Carvalho
  • V. Huber
  • D. Kinna

Their main and subfields of study illustrate an interdisciplinary approach within engineering and physics domains. The subfields prominently featured are:

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Aerospace Engineering

The primary topics of G.H. Jones's research reflect a focus on magnetic confinement fusion and related technologies, specifically:

  • Magnetic confinement fusion research
  • Fusion materials and technologies
  • Superconducting Materials and Applications
  • Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
  • Nuclear reactor physics and engineering

Best Publications

  • Dopaminergic and serotonergic function following isolation rearing in rats: study of behavioural responses and postmortem and in vivo neurochemistry.

    G.H. Jones;T.D. Hernandez;D.A. Kendall;C.A. Marsden

  • Comparative effects of ibotenic acid- and quisqualic acid-induced lesions of the substantia innominata on attentional function in the rat: further implications for the role of the cholinergic neurons of the nucleus basalis in cognitive processes.

    T.W. Robbins;B.J. Everitt;H.M. Marston;J. Wilkinson

  • Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine.

    Hooks Ms;Jones Gh;Smith Ad;Neill Db

  • Behavioural, biochemical and histochemical effects of different neurotoxic amino acids injected into nucleus basalis magnocellularis of rats

    S B Dunnett;I Q Whishaw;G H Jones;S T Bunch

  • Dopamine-rich grafts ameliorate whole body motor asymmetry and sensory neglect but not independent limb use in rats with 6-hydroxydopamine lesions

    Stephen B. Dunnett;Ian Q. Whishaw;Derek C. Rogers;Graham H. Jones

  • Increased sensitivity to amphetamine and reward-related stimuli following social isolation in rats: possible disruption of dopamine-dependent mechanisms of the nucleus accumbens.

    G. H. Jones;C. A. Marsden;T. W. Robbins

  • Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization.

    M.S. Hooks;G.H. Jones;A.D. Smith;D.B. Neill

  • The effects of excitotoxic lesions of the substantia innominata, ventral and dorsal globus pallidus on the acquisition and retention of a conditional visual discrimination: implications for cholinergic hypotheses of learning and memory.

    B.J. Everitt;T.W. Robbins;J.L. Evenden;H.M. Marston

  • Behavioural rigidity and rule-learning deficits following isolation-rearing in the rat: neurochemical correlates.

    G.H. Jones;C.A. Marsden;T.W. Robbins

  • Comparative effects of quisqualic and ibotenic acid-induced lesions of the substantia innominata and globus pallidus on the acquisition of a conditional visual discrimination: differential effects on cholinergic mechanisms.

    T.W. Robbins;B.J. Everitt;C.N. Ryan;H.M. Marston

  • Effects of dopamine depletion from the caudate-putamen and nucleus accumbens septi on the acquisition and performance of a conditional discrimination task.

    T.W. Robbins;V. Giardini;G.H. Jones;P. Reading

  • Individual differences in amphetamine sensitization: dose-dependent effects.

    M.S. Hooks;G.H. Jones;D.B. Neill;J.B. Justice

  • Effects of unilateral dorsal and ventral striatal dopamine depletion on visual neglect in the rat: A neural and behavioural analysis

    M. Carli;G.H. Jones;T.W. Robbins

  • Behavioural and neurochemical effects of early social deprivation in the rat.

    T.W. Robbins;G.H. Jones;Lawrence Stephen Wilkinson

  • Graft-derived recovery from 6-OHDA lesions: specificity of ventral mesencephalic graft tissues.

    S. B. Dunnett;T. D. Hernandez;A. Summerfield;G. H. Jones

  • Distribution and some projections of cholinergic neurons in the brain of the common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus.

    Barry J. Everitt;Taina E. Sirkiä;Angela C. Roberts;Graham H. Jones

  • Sensitization and individual differences to IP amphetamine, cocaine, or caffeine following repeated intracranial amphetamine infusions

    M.S. Hooks;G.H. Jones;B.J. Liem;J.B. Justice

  • Differential effects of mesocortical, mesolimbic, and mesostriatal dopamine depletion on spontaneous, conditioned, and drug-induced locomotor activity

    G.H. Jones;T.W. Robbins

  • The effects of excitotoxic lesions of the basal forebrain on the acquisition, retention and serial reversal of visual discriminations in marmosets.

    A.C. Roberts;T.W. Robbins;B.J. Everitt;G.H. Jones

  • Effects of Nucleus Basalis Magnocellularis Lesions in Rats on Delayed Matching and Non-Matching to Position Tasks.

    Stephen B. Dunnett;Derek C. Rogers;Graham H. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
Barry J. Everitt
Barry J. Everitt University of Cambridge
Stephen B. Dunnett
Stephen B. Dunnett Cardiff University
Ian Q. Whishaw
Ian Q. Whishaw University of Lethbridge
Scott E. Hemby
Scott E. Hemby High Point University
Charles A. Marsden
Charles A. Marsden University of Nottingham
Angela C. Roberts
Angela C. Roberts University of Cambridge
Timothy J Schallert
Timothy J Schallert The University of Texas at Austin
Ole Isacson
Ole Isacson Harvard University
Barbara J. Sahakian
Barbara J. Sahakian University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing G.H. Jones

Recently Published Articles